Coupled osteogenesis and angiogenesis on 3D-printed highly porous PCL/magnesium/laponite nanocomposite scaffold

Reference:s

Bharat Charbe, N. et al. Biomedical applications of three-dimensional bioprinted craniofacial tissue engineering. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 8, e10333 (2023).

Google Scholar
Pandit, A. & Williams, D. F. Challenges with the development of biomaterials for sustainable tissue engineering. Biomater. Sustain. Tissue Eng. 7, 127 (2019).

Google Scholar
Zandi, N. et al. Biomimetic proteoglycan nanoparticles for growth factor immobilization and delivery. Biomater. Sci. 8, 1127–1136 (2020).

Google Scholar
Janmohammadi, M. et al. Cellulose-based composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and localized drug delivery. Bioact. Mater. 20, 137–163 (2023).

Google Scholar
Wasyłeczko, M., Sikorska, W. & Chwojnowski, A. Review of synthetic and hybrid scaffolds in cartilage tissue engineering. Membranes 10, 1–28 (2020).

Google Scholar
Roque, R., Barbosa, G. F. & Guastaldi, A. C. Design and 3D bioprinting of interconnected porous scaffolds for bone regeneration. An additive manufacturing approach. J. Manuf. Process. 64, 655–663 (2021).

Google Scholar
Wang, F. et al. Fabrication and Characterization of PCL/HA Filament as a 3D printing material using thermal extrusion technology for bone tissue engineering. Polymers 14, 699 (2022).

Google Scholar
Song, X. et al. Biomimetic 3D Printing of Hierarchical and interconnected porous hydroxyapatite structures with high mechanical strength for bone cell culture. Adv. Eng. Mater. 21, 1800678 (2019).

Google Scholar
Shahrubudin, N., Lee, T. C. & Ramlan, R. An overview on 3D printing technology: Technological, materials, and applications. Proc. Manuf. 35, 1286–1296 (2019).

Google Scholar
Arora, A., Pathak, A., Juneja, A., Shakkarwal, P. & Kumar, R. Design & analysis of progressive die using solidworks. Mater. Today Proc. 51, 956–960 (2022).

Google Scholar
Kim, J. J. & Cho, D. W. Advanced strategies in 3D bioprinting for vascular tissue engineering and disease modelling using smart bioinks. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 19, e2395470 (2024).

Google Scholar
Vyas, C. et al. 3D printing of silk microparticle reinforced polycaprolactone scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 118, 111433 (2021).

Google Scholar
Roseti, L. et al. Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: State of the art and new perspectives. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 78, 1246–1262 (2017).

Google Scholar
Mirshafiei, M., Rashedi, H., Yazdian, F., Rahdar, A. & Baino, F. Advancements in tissue and organ 3D bioprinting: Current techniques, applications, and future perspectives. Mater. Des. 240, 112853 (2024).

Google Scholar
Dong, L. et al. Facile extrusion 3D printing of gelatine methacrylate/Laponite nanocomposite hydrogel with high concentration nanoclay for bone tissue regeneration. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 188, 72–81 (2021).

Google Scholar
Owida, H. A. et al. Recent applications of electrospun nanofibrous scaffold in tissue engineering. Appl. Bionics Biomech. 2022, 1953861 (2022).

Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Liu, C., Song, T., Cao, Z. & Wang, T. 3D printed polycaprolactone/β-tricalcium phosphate/carbon nanotube composite—Physical properties and biocompatibility. Heliyon 10, e26071 (2024).

Google Scholar
Wong, H. M. et al. Engineered polycaprolactone–magnesium hybrid biodegradable porous scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 24, 561–567 (2014).

Google Scholar
Murugan, S. & Parcha, S. R. Fabrication techniques involved in developing the composite scaffolds PCL/HA nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 32, 93 (2021).

Google Scholar
Satchanska, G., Davidova, S. & Petrov, P. D. Natural and synthetic polymers for biomedical and environmental applications. Polymers 16, 1159 (2024).

Google Scholar
Choi, S. et al. Biochemical activity of magnesium ions on human osteoblast migration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 531, 588–594 (2020).

Google Scholar
He, L. Y., Zhang, X. M., Liu, B., Tian, Y. & Ma, W. H. Effect of magnesium ion on human osteoblast activity. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 49, e5257 (2016).

Google Scholar
Liu, L., Luo, P., Wen, P. & Xu, P. The role of magnesium in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Front Endocrinol 15, 1406248 (2024).

Google Scholar
Rondanelli, M. et al. An update on magnesium and bone health. Biometals 34, 715–736 (2021).

Google Scholar
Tamjid, E. Polymer-based nanocomposites for tissue engineering: Surface to bulk structural design. Integrated Syst. Data Driven Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53652-6_14 (2024).

Google Scholar
Zhao, D. et al. Current status on clinical applications of magnesium-based orthopaedic implants: A review from clinical translational perspective. Biomaterials 112, 287–302 (2017).

Google Scholar
Bonithon, R. et al. Multi-scale mechanical and morphological characterisation of sintered porous magnesium-based scaffolds for bone regeneration in critical-sized defects. Acta Biomater. 127, 338–352 (2021).

Google Scholar
Guo, W. et al. Magnesium hydroxide as a versatile nanofiller for 3D-printed PLA bone scaffolds. Polymers 16, 198 (2024).

Google Scholar
Brokesh, A. M. & Gaharwar, A. K. Inorganic biomaterials for regenerative medicine. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 5319–5344 (2020).

Google Scholar
Ong, W. K., Chakraborty, S. & Sugii, S. Adipose tissue: Understanding the heterogeneity of stem cells for regenerative medicine. Biomolecules 11, 918 (2021).

Google Scholar
Abdal-hay, A. et al. A review of protein adsorption and bioactivity characteristics of poly ε-caprolactone scaffolds in regenerative medicine. Eur. Polym. J. 162, 110892 (2022).

Google Scholar
Das, S. S. et al. Laponite-based Nanomaterials for biomedical applications: A review. Curr Pharm Des 25, 424–443 (2019).

Google Scholar
Tomás, H., Alves, C. S. & Rodrigues, J. Laponite®: A key nanoplatform for biomedical applications?. Nanomedicine 14, 2407–2420 (2018).

Google Scholar
Saygili, E. et al. Bilayered laponite/alginate-poly(acrylamide) composite hydrogel for osteochondral injuries enhances macrophage polarization: An in vivo study. Biomater. Adv. 134, 112721 (2022).

Google Scholar
Rodrigo, M. J. et al. Laponite for biomedical applications: An ophthalmological perspective. Mater. Today Bio 24, 100935 (2023).

Google Scholar
Ruzicka, B. & Zaccarelli, E. A fresh look at the Laponite phase diagram. Soft Matter 7, 1268–1286 (2011).

Google Scholar
Choi, D. et al. Structured nanofilms comprising Laponite® and bone extracellular matrix for osteogenic differentiation of skeletal progenitor cells. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 118, 111440 (2021).

Google Scholar
Ma, Z. et al. 3D bioprinting of proangiogenic constructs with induced immunomodulatory microenvironments through a dual cross-linking procedure using laponite incorporated bioink. Compos. B Eng. 229, 109399 (2022).

Google Scholar
Wu, M. et al. Silk-based hybrid microfibrous mats as guided bone regeneration membranes. J. Mater. Chem. B 9, 2025–2032 (2021).

Google Scholar
Kiaee, G. et al. Laponite-based nanomaterials for drug delivery. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 11, 2102054 (2022).

Google Scholar
Atrian, M., Kharaziha, M., Emadi, R. & Alihosseini, F. Silk-Laponite® fibrous membranes for bone tissue engineering. Appl. Clay Sci. 174, 90–99 (2019).

Google Scholar
Roozbahani, M. & Kharaziha, M. Dexamethasone loaded Laponite®/porous calcium phosphate cement for treatment of bone defects. Biomed. Mater. 14, 055008 (2019).

Google Scholar
Atrian, M., Kharaziha, M., Javidan, H., Alihosseini, F. & Emadi, R. Zwitterionic keratin coating on silk-Laponite fibrous membranes for guided bone regeneration. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 16, 1019–1031 (2022).

Google Scholar
Stealey, S. T., Gaharwar, A. K. & Zustiak, S. P. Laponite-based nanocomposite hydrogels for drug delivery applications. Pharmaceuticals 16, 821 (2023).

Google Scholar
Yuan, L. et al. Nano-laponite encapsulated coaxial fiber scaffold promotes endochondral osteogenesis. Regen. Biomater. 11, (2024).
Furtado, A. S. A. et al. 3D-printed PCL-based scaffolds with high nanosized synthetic smectic clay content: fabrication, mechanical properties, and biological evaluation for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Nanomed. 20, 53–69 (2025).

Google Scholar
Chen, B. et al. Enhancement of critical-sized bone defect regeneration by magnesium oxide-reinforced 3D scaffold with improved osteogenic and angiogenic properties. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 135, 186–198 (2023).

Google Scholar
Tamjid, E. Three-dimensional polycaprolactone-bioactive glass composite scaffolds: Effect of particle size and volume fraction on mechanical properties and in vitro cellular behavior. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 67, 1005–1015 (2018).

Google Scholar
Dong, Q. et al. 3D-printed Mg-incorporated PCL-based scaffolds: A promising approach for bone healing. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 129, 112372 (2021).

Google Scholar
Lu, P. J. et al. Methodology for sample preparation and size measurement of commercial ZnO nanoparticles. J. Food Drug Anal. 26, 628–636 (2018).

Google Scholar
D638-ASTM Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics https://doi.org/10.1520/D0638-14 (2014).
Tamjid, E., Bohlouli, M., Mohammadi, S., Alipour, H. & Nikkhah, M. Sustainable drug release from highly porous and architecturally engineered composite scaffolds prepared by 3D printing. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 108, 1426–1438 (2020).

Google Scholar
Sallum, G. C. B. et al. Enhanced bone matrix formation through a dense lamellar scaffold of chitosan, collagen type I, and hyaluronic acid. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 8, 100549 (2024).

Google Scholar
Hou, Y. et al. Effects of titanium nanoparticles on adhesion, migration, proliferation, and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Int. J. Nanomed. 8, 3619 (2013).

Google Scholar
Wang, L. et al. 3D printed magnesium silicate/β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds promote coupled osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 12, (2025).
Agarwal, T., Maiti, T. K. & Ghosh, S. K. Decellularized caprine liver-derived biomimetic and pro-angiogenic scaffolds for liver tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 98, 939–948 (2019).

Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. C., Coen, B., Wheatley, A. M. & McCullagh, K. J. A. Microvascular Experimentation in the Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane as a Model for Screening Angiogenic Agents including from Gene-Modified Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 452 (2021).

Google Scholar
Todan, L. et al. Comparative study of MgO Nanopowders prepared by different chemical methods. Gels 9, 624 (2023).

Google Scholar
Battaglia, G. et al. Analysis of particles size distributions in Mg(OH)2 precipitation from highly concentrated MgCl2 solutions. Powder Technol. 398, 117106 (2022).

Google Scholar
Kafili, G., Tamjid, E., Niknejad, H. & Simchi, A. Development of injectable hydrogels based on human amniotic membrane and polyethyleneglycol-modified nanosilicates for tissue engineering applications. Eur. Polym. J. 179, 111566 (2022).

Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Physical adsorption of OH− causes anomalous charging at oxide–water interfaces. Chem. Commun. 60, 9113–9116 (2024).

Google Scholar
Kim, B. S., Yang, S. S. & Kim, C. S. Incorporation of BMP-2 nanoparticles on the surface of a 3D-printed hydroxyapatite scaffold using an ε-polycaprolactone polymer emulsion coating method for bone tissue engineering. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 170, 421–429 (2018).

Google Scholar
Nel, A. E. et al. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat. Mater. 8, 543–557 (2009).

Google Scholar
Orafa, Z., Bakhshi, H., Arab-Ahmadi, S. & Irani, S. Laponite/amoxicillin-functionalized PLA nanofibrous as osteoinductive and antibacterial scaffolds. Sci. Rep. 12, 1–12 (2022).

Google Scholar
Li, Q. et al. Thermodynamics and kinetics of hydriding and dehydriding reactions in Mg-based hydrogen storage materials. J. Magnesium Alloys 9, 1922–1941 (2021).

Google Scholar
Arab-Ahmadi, S., Irani, S., Bakhshi, H., Atyabi, F. & Ghalandari, B. Immobilization of carboxymethyl chitosan/laponite on polycaprolactone nanofibers as osteoinductive bone scaffolds. Polym. Adv. Technol. 32, 755–765 (2021).

Google Scholar
Perumal, G., Sivakumar, P. M., Nandkumar, A. M. & Doble, M. Synthesis of magnesium phosphate nanoflakes and its PCL composite electrospun nanofiber scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 109, 110527 (2020).

Google Scholar
Olivera, N. et al. Effect of LAPONITE® addition on the mechanical, barrier and surface properties of novel biodegradable kafirin nanocomposite films. J. Food Eng. 245, 24–32 (2019).

Google Scholar
Miao, S. et al. A 3D bioprinted nano-laponite hydrogel construct promotes osteogenesis by activating PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Mater. Today Bio. 16, 100342 (2022).

Google Scholar
Lipovka, A. et al. Time-stable wetting effect of plasma-treated biodegradable scaffolds functionalized with graphene oxide. Surf. Coat. Technol. 388, 125560 (2020).

Google Scholar
Jiang, J., Liu, W., Xiong, Z., Hu, Y. & Xiao, J. Effects of biomimetic hydroxyapatite coatings on osteoimmunomodulation. Biomater. Adv. 134, 112640 (2022).

Google Scholar
Agyapong, P. O. et al. Synthesis of magnesium oxide from waste magnesium-rich Cucurbita pepo (pumpkin) seeds. Sustain. Environ. 9, 2258473 (2023).

Google Scholar
Lee, D. J. et al. Effect of pore size in bone regeneration using polydopamine-laced hydroxyapatite collagen calcium silicate scaffolds fabricated by 3D mold printing technology. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 22, 127 (2019).

Google Scholar
Morariu, S., Brunchi, C. E., Honciuc, M. & Iftime, M. M. Development of hybrid materials based on chitosan, poly(Ethylene Glycol) and laponite® RD: Effect of clay concentration. Polymers 15, 841 (2023).

Google Scholar
Woo, H. J., Majid, S. R. & Arof, A. K. Effect of ethylene carbonate on proton conducting polymer electrolyte based on poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL). Solid State Ion. 252, 102–108 (2013).

Google Scholar
Fulati, A., Uto, K. & Ebara, M. Influences of crystallinity and crosslinking density on the shape recovery force in poly(ε-Caprolactone)-based shape-memory polymer blends. Polymers 14, 4740 (2022).

Google Scholar
Kalva, S. N., Ali, F., Velasquez, C. A. & Koç, M. 3D-Printable PLA/Mg Composite Filaments for Potential Bone Tissue Engineering Applications. Polymers. 15, (2023).
Mahdavinia, G. R., Rahmani, Z., Mosallanezhad, A., Karami, S. & Shahriari, M. Effect of magnetic laponite RD on swelling and dye adsorption behaviors of κ-carrageenan-based nanocomposite hydrogels. Desalin. Water Treat. 57, 20582–20596 (2016).

Google Scholar
Xiong, Z., Fu, F. & Li, X. Experimental investigation on laponite as ultra-high-temperature viscosifier of water-based drilling fluids. SN Appl. Sci. 1, 1–8 (2019).

Google Scholar
Tabesh, E., Kharaziha, M., Mahmoudi, M., Shahnam, E. & Rozbahani, M. Biological and corrosion evaluation of Laponite®: Poly(caprolactone) nanocomposite coating for biomedical applications. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp 583, 123945 (2019).

Google Scholar
Adhikari, U. et al. Embedding magnesium metallic particles in polycaprolactone nanofiber mesh improves applicability for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater. 98, 215–234 (2019).

Google Scholar
Lee, H. et al. A strategy for enhancing bioactivity and osseointegration with antibacterial effect by incorporating magnesium in polylactic acid based biodegradable orthopedic implant. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 254, 127797 (2024).

Google Scholar
Kovács, K. et al. Anisotropy, Anatomical region, and additional variables influence Young’s modulus of bone: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JBMR Plus 7, (2023).
Sattary, M., Kefayat, A., Bigham, A. & Rafienia, M. Polycaprolactone/Gelatin/Hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffold seeded with Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth to enhance bone repair: in vitro and in vivo studies. Mater. Technol. 37, 302–315 (2022).

Google Scholar
Tao, L. et al. In vitro and in vivo studies of a gelatin/carboxymethyl chitosan/LAPONITE® composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. RSC Adv. 7, 54100–54110 (2017).

Google Scholar
Brunchi, C. E. & Morariu, S. Laponite®—from dispersion to gel—structure, properties, and applications. Molecules 29, 2823 (2024).

Google Scholar
Ji, J. et al. Preparation and characterization of bioactive and degradable composites containing ordered mesoporous calcium-magnesium silicate and poly(l-lactide). Appl. Surf. Sci. 317, 1090–1099 (2014).

Google Scholar
Sharma, C., Dinda, A. K., Potdar, P. D., Chou, C. F. & Mishra, N. C. Fabrication and characterization of novel nano-biocomposite scaffold of chitosan–gelatin–alginate–hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 64, 416–427 (2016).

Google Scholar
Tipa, C. et al. Clay-based nanocomposite hydrogels for biomedical applications: A review. Nanomaterials 12, 3308 (2022).

Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Hu, J., Yu, J. & Chen, D. Preparation and characterization of nano-Laponite/PLGA composite scaffolds for urethra tissue engineering. Mol. Biotechnol. 62, 192–199 (2020).

Google Scholar
Tamjid, E., Marzooghi, S., Najafi, P. & Behmanesh, M. Three-dimensional gradient porous polymeric composites for osteochondral regeneration. J. Polym. 29, 1–7 (2022).

Google Scholar
Panahi, Z., Tamjid, E. & Rezaei, M. Surface modification of biodegradable AZ91 magnesium alloy by electrospun polymer nanocomposite: Evaluation of in vitro degradation and cytocompatibility. Surf. Coat. Technol. 386, 125461 (2020).

Google Scholar
Long, J. et al. Multifunctional magnesium incorporated scaffolds by 3D-Printing for comprehensive postsurgical management of osteosarcoma. Biomaterials 275, 120950 (2021).

Google Scholar
Wu, J., Cheng, X., Wu, J., Chen, J. & Pei, X. The development of magnesium-based biomaterials in bone tissue engineering: A review. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 112, e35326 (2024).

Google Scholar
Zhao, X. et al. 3D-printed Mg-1Ca/polycaprolactone composite scaffolds with promoted bone regeneration. J. Magnes. Alloys 12, 966–979 (2024).

Google Scholar
Ma, Y., Yi, S. & Wang, M. Biomimetic mineralization for carbon capture and sequestration. Carbon Capture Sci. Technol. 13, 100257 (2024).

Google Scholar
Zreiqat, H. et al. Mechanisms of magnesium-stimulated adhesion of osteoblastic cells to commonly used orthopaedic implants. J. Biomed. Mater. Res 62, 175–184 (2002).

Google Scholar
Rostami, F., Tamjid, E. & Behmanesh, M. Drug-eluting PCL/graphene oxide nanocomposite scaffolds for enhanced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 115, 111102 (2020).

Google Scholar
Kalaiselvan, E. et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell-laden nanocomposite scaffolds enhance bone regeneration in rabbit critical-size segmental bone defect model. J. Funct. Biomater. 15, (2024).
Liu, W. et al. Magnesium promotes bone formation and angiogenesis by enhancing MC3T3-E1 secretion of PDGF-BB. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 528, 664–670 (2020).

Google Scholar
Hung, C. C., Chaya, A., Liu, K., Verdelis, K. & Sfeir, C. The role of magnesium ions in bone regeneration involves the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. Acta Biomater. 98, 246–255 (2019).

Google Scholar
Dawson, J. I. & Oreffo, R. O. C. Clay: New Opportunities for tissue regeneration and biomaterial design. Adv. Mater. 25, 4069–4086 (2013).

Google Scholar
Bhattarai, G., Shrestha, S. K., Rijal, S., Kook, S. H. & Lee, J. C. Supplemental Magnesium Gluconate Enhances Scaffold-Mediated New Bone Formation and Natural Bone Healing by Angiogenic- and Wnt Signal-Associated Osteogenic Activation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 113, (2025).
Ronca, D. et al. Bone tissue engineering: 3D PCL-based nanocomposite scaffolds with tailored properties. Proc. CIRP 49, 51–54 (2016).

Google Scholar
Miao, S. et al. Optimal proportion of Laponite in hydrogel for promoting bone regeneration via MAPK-Erk pathway. Mater. Des. 257, 114446 (2025).

Google Scholar
Wang, L., Ruan, M., Bu, Q. & Zhao, C. Signaling pathways driving MSC osteogenesis: Mechanisms, regulation, and translational applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 26, 1311 (2025).

Google Scholar
Tang, Y., Zhang, X., Ge, W. & Zhou, Y. Knockdown of LAP2α inhibits osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells by activating NF-κB. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 11, 1–13 (2020).

Google Scholar
Yamada, T. et al. β₂ adrenergic receptor activation suppresses bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-induced alkaline phosphatase expression in osteoblast-like MC3T3E1 cells. J. Cell Biochem. 116, 1144–1152 (2015).

Google Scholar
Caviglia, C. et al. In situ electrochemical analysis of alkaline phosphatase activity in 3D cell cultures. Electrochim. Acta 359, 136951 (2020).

Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Dynamic regulation of stem cell adhesion and differentiation on degradable piezoelectric poly (L-lactic acid) (PLLA) nanofibers. Biomed. Eng. Lett. 14, 775–784 (2024).

Google Scholar
Pomiès, P. et al. The cytoskeleton-associated PDZ-LIM protein, ALP, acts on serum response factor activity to regulate muscle differentiation. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 1723–1733 (2007).

Google Scholar
Coelho, C. C. et al. The antibacterial and angiogenic effect of magnesium oxide in a hydroxyapatite bone substitute. Sci. Rep. 10, 19098 (2020).

Google Scholar
Dong, J. et al. Extrusion-based 3D printed magnesium scaffolds with multifunctional MgF2 and MgF2–CaP coatings. Biomater. Sci. 9, 7159–7182 (2021).

Google Scholar
Hu, J., Shao, J., Huang, G., Zhang, J. & Pan, S. In vitro and in vivo applications of magnesium-enriched biomaterials for vascularized osteogenesis in bone tissue engineering: A review of literature. J. Funct. Biomater. 14, 326 (2023).

Google Scholar
Gao, P. et al. Biofunctional magnesium coated Ti6Al4V scaffold enhances osteogenesis and angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo for orthopedic application. Bioact. Mater. 5, 680–693 (2020).

Google Scholar
Page, D. J. et al. Injectable nanoclay gels for angiogenesis. Acta Biomater. 100, 378–387 (2019).

Google Scholar
Cao, B. et al. 3D bioprinted functional scaffold based on synergistic induction of iprf and laponite exerts efficient and personalised bone regeneration via MiRNA-mediated TGF-β/Smads signaling. Int. J. Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002312 (2025).

Google Scholar
Xu, X. et al. Nanosilicate-functionalized polycaprolactone orchestrates osteogenesis and osteoblast-induced multicellular interactions for potential endogenous vascularized bone regeneration. Macromol. Biosci. 22, 2100265 (2022).

Google Scholar
Byambaa, B. et al. Bioprinted osteogenic and vasculogenic patterns for engineering 3D bone tissue. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 6, 1700015 (2017).

Google Scholar
Chen, C., Huang, B., Liu, Y., Liu, F. & Lee, I. S. Functional engineering strategies of 3D printed implants for hard tissue replacement. Regen. Biomater. 10, rbac094 (2023).

Google Scholar

Download references