Experimental study on the influence of PDA-modified PDMS on the biological behavior of mouse fibroblasts

Posted on
experimental-study-on-the-influence-of-pda-modified-pdms-on-the-biological-behavior-of-mouse-fibroblasts
Experimental study on the influence of PDA-modified PDMS on the biological behavior of mouse fibroblasts

References

  1. Li, K. et al. Intrinsically hydrophobic magnesium oxychloride cement foam for thermal insulation material. Constr. Build. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.123129 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tangyou Sun, Y. et al. Wafer-scale high anti-reflective nano/micro hybrid interface structures via aluminum grain dependent self-organization. Mater. Design. 194 (prepublish), 108960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108960 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chung, C. K. et al. Water-assisted CO2 laser ablated glass and modified thermal bonding for capillary-driven bio-fluidic application. Biomed. Microdevices. 12, 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-009-9365-x (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lai, C. C. & Chung, C. K. Hydrophilicity and optic property of polyethylene glycol coating on polydimethylsiloxane for fast prototyping and its application to backlight microfluidic chip. Surf. Coat. Technol. 389, 125606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125606 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, Y. & Zhang, X. Microfluidics-Based plasmonic biosensing system based on patterned plasmonic nanostructure arrays. Micromachines 12 (7), 826. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12070826 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, Z. & Lee, J. B. Biocompatibility of SU-8 and its biomedical device applications. Micromachines 12 (7), 794. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12070794 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Srivatsan, K. & Natasha, U. Cell adhesion on polyelectrolyte multilayer coated polydimethylsiloxane surfaces with varying topographies. Tissue Eng. 13 (8), 2105–2117 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhai, Y., Gong, Y. & Du, J. Surface modification of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and its application in cell Culture. Shandong Chem. Ind. 48 (01), 56–57. https://doi.org/10.19319/j.cnki.issn.1008-021x.2019.01.020 (2019). [in Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aerts, S. et al. Plasma-treated PDMS-membranes in solvent resistant nanofiltration: Characterization and study of transport mechanism,275, Issues 1–2, 2006. J. Membr. Sci. 275, 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.09.021 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dhananjay Bodas & Chantal Khan-Malek. Hydrophilization and hydrophobic recovery of PDMS by oxygen plasma and chemical treatment—An SEM investigation. Sens. Actuators: B Chem. 123 (1), 368–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2006.08.037 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dhananjay Bodas & Chantal Khan-Malek. Formation of more stable hydrophilic surfaces of PDMS by plasma and chemical treatments. Microelectron. Eng. 83 (4–9), 1277–1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2006.01.195 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Oláh, A. et al. Hydrophobic recovery of UV/ozone treated poly(dimethylsiloxane): adhesion studies by contact mechanics and mechanism of surface modification. Appl. Surf. Sci. 239, 410–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.06.005 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Berdichevsky, Y. et al. UV/ozone modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic channels. Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 97, 402–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2003.09.022 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Seo, J. et al. Effects on wettability by surfactant accumulation/depletion in bulk polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 119(1), 192–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2005.12.019 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, H., Scherer, N. F. & Messersmith, P. B. Single-molecule mechanics of mussel adhesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 103 (35), 12999–13003. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605552103 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Waite, J. H. & Tanzer, M. L. Polyphenolic substance of mytilus edulis: novel adhesive containing L-Dopa and hydroxyproline. Sci. (New York N Y). 212 (4498), 1038–1040. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.212.4498.1038 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Waite, J. H. & Qin, X. Polyphosphoprotein from the adhesive pads of mytilus Edulis. Biochemistry 40 (9), 2887–2893. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi002718x (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lee, H. et al. Mussel-Inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional Coatings. Science 318(5849), 426–430 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yu, F. et al. Experimental and theoretical analysis of polymerization reaction process on the polydopamine membranes and its corrosion protection properties for 304 Stainless Steel. J. Mol. Struct. 982(1–3), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2010.08.021 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li, B. et al. Ultrathin and stable active layer of dense composite membrane enabled by poly(dopamine). Langmuir: ACS J. Surf. Colloids. 25 (13), 7368–7374. https://doi.org/10.1021/la900262p (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Andrzej, G. et al. Electron beam treatment of high NOx concentration off-gases. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 81(8), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2011.12.012 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Huacun Huang, D., Ye, B., Huang, Z. & Wei,. Vanadium supported on viscose-based activated carbon fibers modified by oxygen plasma for the SCR of NO, Catalysis Today, 139, Issues 1–2, 2008. Catalysis Today 139(1–2), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2008.08.028 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou, J. et al. Interfacial assembly of mussel-inspired au@ag@ polydopamine core-shell nanoparticles for recyclable nanocatalysts. Adv. Mater. (Deerfield Beach Fla). 26 (5), 701–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201303032 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tian, Y., Cao, Y., Wang, Y., Yang, W. & Feng, J. Realizing ultrahigh modulus and high strength of macroscopic graphene oxide papers through crosslinking of mussel-inspired polymers. Adv. Mater. (Deerfield Beach Fla). 25 (21), 2980–2983. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201300118 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mei, S. et al. Enhanced catalytic activity of Gold@Polydopamine nanoreactors with Multi-compartment structure under NIR irradiation. Nano-micro Lett. 11 (1), 83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-019-0314-9 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li, C. Y., Wang, W. C., Xu, F. J., Zhang, L. Q. & Yang, W. T. Preparation of pH-sensitive membranes via dopamine-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization. J. Membr. Sci. 367(1–2), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.09.057 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ieong, W. & Chih-Ming, H. Surface molecular property modifications for poly(dimethylsiloxane)(PDMS)based microfluidic devices. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 7 (3), 291–306 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hong, S. et al. Attenuation of the in vivo toxicity of biomaterials by polydopamine surface modification. Nanomed. (London England). 6 (5), 793–801. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.11.76 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, P. et al. Facile fabrication of superhydrophilic surface on poly(dimethylsiloxane) substrate via a single-step polydopamine coating. RSC Adv. 8 (42), 23642–23648 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lina Chen, C. & Zheng, Y. Z. Functional polymer surfaces for controlling cell behaviors. Mater. Today. 21 (Issue 1), 38–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.002 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ueda, E. & Levkin, P. A. Emerging applications of Superhydrophilic-Superhydrophobic micropatterns. Adv. Mater. 25, 1234–1247. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201204120 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Szukalska, M. et al. How do particle size, dosage, and exposure duration influence oxidative stress parameters and the in vivo toxicological profile of polydopamine nanoparticles?. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 242, 614–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2025.10.265 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pollard, D. T. & Borisy, G. G. Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin Filaments. Cell 113 (4), 549–549 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stephan, B. et al. Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing. Wound Repair Regener. 16(5), 585–601 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Andrea, I., McClatchey, Alpha, S. & Yap,. Contact inhibition (of proliferation) redux. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24(5), 685–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2012.06.009 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rizzino, A., Kazakoff, P., Ruff, E., Kuszynski, C. & Nebelsick, J. Regulatory effects of cell density on the binding of transforming growth factor beta, epidermal growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, and fibroblast growth factor. Cancer Res. 48 (15), 4266–4271 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tomasek, J. et al. Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 3, 349–363. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm809 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Filipa, N. R. G. Author correction: the bright side of fibroblasts: molecular signature and regenerative cues in major organs. NPJ Regenerative Med. 8 (1), 42–42 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Han, G. et al. Preventive and therapeutic effects of Smad7 on radiation-induced oral mucositis. Nat. Med. 19 (4), 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3118 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shawn, M. et al. COL1A1 oligodeoxynucleotides decoy: Biochemical and morphologic effects in an acute wound repair model. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 89(3), 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexmp.2010.07.003 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cao, W. & Feng, Y. LncRNA XIST promotes extracellular matrix synthesis, proliferation and migration by targeting miR-29b-3p/COL1A1 in human skin fibroblasts after thermal injury. Biol. Res. 52, 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-019-0260-5 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gansevoort, M. et al. Next-Generation biomaterials for wound healing: development and evaluation of collagen scaffolds functionalized with a Heparan sulfate mimic and fibroblast growth factor 2. J. Funct. Biomaterials. 16 (2), 51–51 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Related Posts