The sequential use of IVF disposable devices doesn’t cause cumulative toxicity unless a defective device compromises the entire procedure

1. Consensus Group, C. There is only one thing that is truly important in an IVF laboratory: everything’ Cairo consensus guidelines on IVF culture conditions. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 40, 33–60 (2020).

   Google Scholar 

2. Sciorio, R. & Rinaudo, P. Culture conditions in the IVF laboratory: state of the ART and possible new directions. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 40, 2591–2607 (2023).

   Google Scholar 

3. McDonald, G. R. et al. Bioactive contaminants leach from disposable laboratory plasticware. Science 322, 917 (2008).

   Google Scholar 

4. Nijs, M. et al. Reprotoxicity of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer disposables and products: a 4-year survey. Fertil. Steril. 92, 527–535 (2009).

   Google Scholar 

5. Olivieri, A. et al. On the disruption of biochemical and biological assays by chemicals leaching from disposable laboratory plasticware. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 90, 697–703 (2012).

   Google Scholar 

6. Gatimel, N. et al. Bisphenol A in culture media and plastic consumables used for ART. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 31, 1436–1444 (2016).

   Google Scholar 

7. Chu, Y. et al. Variable VOCs in plastic culture flasks and their potential impact on cell volatile biomarkers. Anal. Bioanal Chem. 412, 5397–5408 (2020).

   Google Scholar 

8. Delaroche, L., Besnard, L., Cassuto, N. G., Bristeau, S. & Togola, A. Assessment of bisphenol accumulation from disposable devices used sequentially in IVF routine procedures. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 50, 104431 (2024).

   Google Scholar 

9. Cohen, J., Gilligan, A., Esposito, W., Schimmel, T. & Dale, B. Ambient air and its potential effects on conception in vitro. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 12, 1742–1749 (1997).

   Google Scholar 

10. Mortimer, D. et al. Cairo consensus on the IVF laboratory environment and air quality: report of an expert meeting. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 36, 658–674 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

11. Vardhan, P. V., Shukla, L. & I. FT-IR investigations on effect of high doses of gamma radiation-induced damage to polystyrene and mechanism of formation of radiolysis products. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 57, 301–310 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

12. Regulation (eu) & 745 of the european parliament and of the council – of 5. / April 2017 – on medical devices, amending directive 2001/ 83/ EC, regulation (EC) 178/ 2002 and regulation (EC) 1223/ 2009 and repealing Council directives 90/ 385/ EEC and 93/ 42/ EEC. (2017).

13. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine & Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Revised guidelines for human embryology and andrology laboratories. Fertil. Steril. 90, S45–59 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

14. ESHRE Guideline Group on Good Practice in IVF Labs et al. Revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories (2015). Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 31, 685–686 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

15. Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) and the Society for Reproductive Biologists and Technologists (SRBT). Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org. Comprehensive guidance for human embryology, andrology, and endocrinology laboratories: management and operations: a committee opinion. Fertil. Steril. 117, 1183–1202 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

16. Ackerman, S. B., Stokes, G. L., Swanson, R. J., Taylor, S. P. & Fenwick, L. Toxicity testing for human in vitro fertilization programs. J. Vitro Fertil. Embryo Transf. IVF. 2, 132–137 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

17. Critchlow, J. D. et al. Quality control in an in-vitro fertilization laboratory: use of human sperm survival studies. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 4, 545–549 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

18. Claassens, O. E., Wehr, J. B. & Harrison, K. L. Optimizing sensitivity of the human sperm motility assay for embryo toxicity testing. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 15, 1586–1591 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

19. Delaroche, L., Besnard, L., Ouary, V., Bazin, F. & Cassuto, G. Disposables used cumulatively in routine IVF procedures could display toxicity. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. deae028 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae028 (2024).

20. Mestres, E. et al. O-212 A need to standardize: the use and posterior recall of toxic consumables could be avoided with the appropriate testing protocols. Hum. Reprod. 39, deae108.245 (2024).

21. Delaroche, L. et al. Embryotoxicity testing of IVF disposables: how do manufacturers test? Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 35, 283–292 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

22. Mouse Embryo Assay for Assisted Reproduction Technology Devices. – Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff.

23. Wolff, H. S., Fredrickson, J. R., Walker, D. L. & Morbeck, D. E. Advances in quality control: mouse embryo morphokinetics are sensitive markers of in vitro stress. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 28, 1776–1782 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

24. Gilbert, R. S., Nunez, B., Sakurai, K., Fielder, T. & Ni, H. T. Genetic mouse embryo assay: improving performance and quality testing for assisted reproductive technology (ART) with a functional bioassay. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. RBE. 14, 13 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

25. Ainsworth, A. J., Fredrickson, J. R. & Morbeck, D. E. Improved detection of mineral oil toxicity using an extended mouse embryo assay. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 34, 391–397 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

26. Sladowski, D., Grabska-Liberek, I., Olkowska-Truchanowicz, J., Lipski, K. & Gut, G. An evaluation of sterilisation processes. Altern. Lab. Anim. ATLA. 36, 585–590 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

27. Pollet-Villard, X. & Levy, R. [Impact of air quality on practices and results in the IVF laboratory]. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. Senol. 46, 713–728 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

28. Yang, X. et al. Determination of volatile organic compounds level in incubators. Fertil. Steril. 106, e286–e287 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

29. Ikezuki, Y., Tsutsumi, O., Takai, Y., Kamei, Y. & Taketani, Y. Determination of bisphenol A concentrations in human biological fluids reveals significant early prenatal exposure. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 17, 2839–2841 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

30. Bonefeld-Jørgensen, E. C., Long, M., Hofmeister, M. V. & Vinggaard, A. M. Endocrine-disrupting potential of bisphenol A, bisphenol A dimethacrylate, 4-n-nonylphenol, and 4-n-octylphenol in vitro: new data and a brief review. Environ. Health Perspect. 115 (Suppl 1), 69–76 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

31. Desmarchais, A. et al. Bisphenol S impaired in vitro ovine early developmental oocyte competence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 1238 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

32. Richter, C. A., Taylor, J. A., Ruhlen, R. L., Welshons, W. V. & Vom Saal, F. S. Estradiol and bisphenol A stimulate androgen receptor and Estrogen receptor gene expression in fetal mouse prostate mesenchyme cells. Environ. Health Perspect. 115, 902–908 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

33. Ma, Y. et al. The adverse health effects of bisphenol A and related toxicity mechanisms. Environ. Res. 176, 108575 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

34. Nguyen, M., Sabry, R., Davis, O. S. & Favetta, L. A. Effects of BPA, BPS, and BPF on oxidative stress and antioxidant enzyme expression in bovine oocytes and spermatozoa. Genes 13, 142 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

35. Rochester, J. R. Bisphenol A and human health: a review of the literature. Reprod. Toxicol. Elmsford N. 42, 132–155 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

36. Mahalingaiah, S., Hauser, R., Patterson, D. G., Woudneh, M. & Racowsky, C. Bisphenol A is not detectable in media or selected contact materials used in IVF. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 25, 608–611 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

37. Togola, A. et al. Bisphenol S is present in culture media used for ART and cell culture. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 36, 1032–1042 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

38. Vandenberg, L. N. et al. Urinary, circulating, and tissue biomonitoring studies indicate widespread exposure to bisphenol A. Environ. Health Perspect. 118, 1055–1070 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

39. Chianese, R. et al. Bisphenol A in reproduction: epigenetic effects. Curr. Med. Chem. 25, 748–770 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

40. Saleh, A. C., Sabry, R., Mastromonaco, G. F. & Favetta, L. A. BPA and BPS affect the expression of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and its receptor during bovine oocyte maturation and early embryo development. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. RBE. 19, 119 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

41. Martínez-Casado, A. et al. O-209 Identifying toxicity trends: analysis of over 6700 Mouse Embryo Assays performed on 16 categories of IVF supplies. Hum. Reprod. 39, deae108.242 (2024).

42. Gualtieri, R. et al. In vitro culture of mammalian embryos: is there room for improvement? Cells 13, 996 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

43. Ménézo, Y. J. R. & Hérubel, F. Mouse and bovine models for human IVF. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 4, 170–175 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

44. Esfandiari, N. & Gubista, A. Mouse embryo assay for human in vitro fertilization quality control: a fresh look. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 37, 1123–1127 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

Download references