Validation and application of a standardized quantitative PCR assay for the assessment of antimicrobial resistance genes in surface water

1. Franklin, A. M. et al. A one health approach for monitoring antimicrobial resistance: developing a National freshwater pilot effort. Front. Water 6 (2024).

2. Larsson, D. G. J. & Flach, C-F. Antibiotic resistance in the environment. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 257–269 (2022).

   Google Scholar 

3. Li, L-G., Huang, Q., Yin, X. & Zhang, T. Source tracking of antibiotic resistance genes in the environment — Challenges, progress, and prospects. Water Res. 185, 116127 (2020).

   Google Scholar 

4. Liguori, K. et al. Antimicrobial resistance monitoring of water environments: A framework for standardized methods and quality control. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 9149–9160 (2022).

   Google Scholar 

5. Milligan, E. G. et al. A systematic review of Culture-Based methods for monitoring Antibiotic-Resistant Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, and Pseudomonas as environmentally relevant pathogens in wastewater and surface water. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 10, 154–171 (2023).

   Google Scholar 

6. Nappier, S. P., Liguori, K., Ichida, A. M., Stewart, J. R. & Jones, K. R. Antibiotic resistance in recreational waters: state of the science. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 17 (2020).

7. Chen, Z. et al. Unraveling the influence of human fecal pollution on antibiotic resistance gene levels in different receiving water bodies using crassphage indicator gene. J. Hazard. Mater. 442, 130005 (2023).

   Google Scholar 

8. Drane, K., Sheehan, M., Whelan, A., Ariel, E. & Kinobe, R. The role of wastewater treatment plants in dissemination of antibiotic resistance: Source, Measurement, removal and risk assessment. Antibiotics 13, 668 (2024).

   Google Scholar 

9. Kim, J. J. et al. Persistence of antibiotic resistance from animal agricultural effluents to surface water revealed by genome-centric metagenomics. J. Hazard. Mater. 457, 131761 (2023).

   Google Scholar 

10. Wang, Z., Cai, M., Du, P. & Li, X. Wastewater surveillance for antibiotics and resistance genes in a river catchment: Spatiotemporal variations and the main drivers. Water Res. 251, 121090 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

11. Burch, T. R. et al. Microbial source tracking and land use associations for antibiotic resistance genes in private wells influenced by human and livestock fecal sources. J. Environ. Qual. 52, 270–286 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

12. Kocurek, B. et al. Metagenomic survey of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Maryland surface waters differentiated by high and low human impact. Microbiol. Resource Announcements. 13, e00477–e00423 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

13. Nolan, T. M. et al. Land use as a critical determinant of faecal and antimicrobial resistance gene pollution in riverine systems. Sci. Total Environ. 871, 162052 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

14. Gupta, S., Graham, D. W., Sreekrishnan, T. R. & Ahammad, S. Z. Heavy metal and antibiotic resistance in four Indian and UK rivers with different levels and types of water pollution. Sci. Total Environ. 857, 159059 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

15. Liu, S., Wang, P., Wang, X. & Chen, J. Ecological insights into the elevational biogeography of antibiotic resistance genes in a pristine river: metagenomic analysis along the Yarlung Tsangpo river on the Tibetan plateau. Environ. Pollut. 286, 117101 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

16. Reichert, G. et al. Determination of antibiotic resistance genes in a WWTP-impacted river in surface water, sediment, and biofilm: influence of seasonality and water quality. Sci. Total Environ. 768, 144526 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

17. Vadde, K. K., McCarthy, A. J., Rong, R. & Sekar, R. Quantification of microbial source tracking and pathogenic bacterial markers in water and sediments of Tiaoxi river (Taihu watershed). Front. Microbiol. 10 (2019).

18. Abramova, A., Berendonk, T. U. & Bengtsson-Palme, J. A global baseline for qPCR-determined antimicrobial resistance gene prevalence across environments. Environ. Int. 178, 108084 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

19. D’Costa, V. M. et al. Antibiotic resistance is ancient. Nature 477, 457–461 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

20. Rothrock, M. J. Jr et al. How should we be determining background and baseline antibiotic resistance levels in agroecosystem research? J. Environ. Qual. 45, 420–431 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

21. Baron, J. S. et al. Marmots do not drink coffee: human urine contributions to the nitrogen budget of a popular National park destination. Ecosphere 14, e4504 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

22. Clow, D. W. et al. Effects of stock use and backpackers on water quality in wilderness in sequoia and kings Canyon National Parks, USA. Environ. Manage. 52, 1400–1414 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

23. Forrester, H., Clow, D., Roche, J., Heyvaert, A. & Battaglin, W. Effects of backpacker Use, pack stock trail Use, and pack stock grazing on Water-Quality Indicators, including Nutrients, E. coli, Hormones, and Pharmaceuticals, in Yosemite National park. USA Environ. Manage. 60, 526–543 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

24. Goodwin, K., Loso, M. G. & Braun, M. Glacial transport of human waste and survival of fecal bacteria on Mt. McKinley’s Kahiltna Glacier, Denali National Park, Alaska. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 44, 432–445 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

25. Griffin, D. W., Gray, M. A., Lyles, M. B. & Northup, D. E. The transport of nonindigenous microorganisms into caves by human visitation: A case study at Carlsbad caverns National park. Geomicrobiol J. 31, 175–185 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

26. Moldovan, O. T. et al. Management of water bodies in show caves – A microbial approach. Tour. Manag. 78, 104037 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

27. Scott, L. C. et al. Use of microbial fecal indicator monitoring and fecal source tracking as a park management tool in Rocky mountain National park. Environ. Challenges. 8, 100583 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

28. Ahlstrom, C. A., Scott, L. C., Woksepp, H., Bonnedahl, J. & Ramey, A. M. Environmental antimicrobial resistance gene detection from wild bird habitats using two methods: A commercially available culture-independent qPCR assay and culture of indicator bacteria followed by whole-genome sequencing. J. Global Antimicrob. Resist. 33, 186–193 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

29. Rochegüe, T. et al. An inventory of 44 qPCR assays using hydrolysis probes operating with a unique amplification condition for the detection and quantification of antibiotic resistance genes. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 100, 115328 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

30. Ng, L. K., Martin, I., Alfa, M. & Mulvey, M. Multiplex PCR for the detection of Tetracycline resistant genes. Mol. Cell Probes. 15, 209–215 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

31. Poirel, L., Walsh, T. R., Cuvillier, V. & Nordmann, P. Multiplex PCR for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 70, 119–123 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

32. Tolosi, R. et al. Rapid detection and quantification of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance genes (mcr‐1 to mcr‐5) by real‐time PCR in bacterial and environmental samples. J. Appl. Microbiol. 129, 1523–1529 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

33. Hozalski Raymond, M., Zhao, X., Kim, T. & LaPara Timothy, M. On-site filtration of large sample volumes improves the detection of opportunistic pathogens in drinking water distribution systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 90, e01658–e01623 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

34. Kahler, A. M. et al. Evaluation of an Ultrafiltration-Based procedure for simultaneous recovery of diverse microbes in source waters. Water 7, 1202–1216 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

35. Korajkic, A., Kelleher, J., Shanks, O. C., Herrmann, M. P. & McMinn, B. R. Effectiveness of two wastewater disinfection strategies for the removal of fecal indicator bacteria, bacteriophage, and enteric viral pathogens concentrated using dead-end Hollow fiber ultrafiltration (D-HFUF). Sci. Total Environ. 831, 154861 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

36. Kraft, A. L. et al. A comparison of methods to detect low levels of Salmonella enterica in surface waters to support antimicrobial resistance surveillance efforts performed in multiple laboratories. Sci. Total Environ. 905, 167189 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

37. Li, X., Harwood Valerie, J., Nayak, B. & Weidhaas Jennifer, L. Ultrafiltration and microarray for detection of microbial source tracking marker and pathogen genes in riverine and marine systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 1625–1635 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

38. Liu, P. et al. Hollow-fiber ultrafiltration for simultaneous recovery of viruses, bacteria and parasites from reclaimed water. J. Microbiol. Methods. 88, 155–161 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

39. Liu, P. et al. Development of Moore swab and ultrafiltration concentration and detection methods for Salmonella typhi and Salmonella paratyphi A in wastewater and application in Kolkata, India and Dhaka, Bangladesh. Front. Microbiol. 12 (2021).

40. Pascual-Benito, M. et al. Assessment of dead-end ultrafiltration for the detection and quantification of microbial indicators and pathogens in the drinking water treatment processes. Int. J. Hyg. Environ Health. 230, 113628 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

41. Robla, J. et al. Determination of the efficiency of filtration of cultures from microalgae and bacteria using Hollow fiber filters. Environ. Science: Water Res. Technol. 7, 1230–1239 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

42. Smith Carmela, M. & Hill Vincent, R. Dead-End Hollow-Fiber ultrafiltration for recovery of diverse microbes from water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 5284–5289 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

43. Polaczyk, A. L. et al. Ultrafiltration-based techniques for rapid and simultaneous concentration of multiple microbe classes from 100-L tap water samples. J. Microbiol. Methods. 73, 92–99 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

44. Gallardo, V. J., Morris, B. J. & Rhodes, E. R. The use of Hollow fiber Dialysis filters operated in axial flow mode for recovery of microorganisms in large volume water samples with high loadings of particulate matter. J. Microbiol. Methods. 160, 143–153 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

45. Mull, B. & Hill, V. R. Recovery of diverse microbes in high turbidity surface water samples using dead-end ultrafiltration. J. Microbiol. Methods. 91, 429–433 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

46. Nadkarni, M. A., Martin, F. E., Jacques, N. A. & Hunter, N. Determination of bacterial load by real-time PCR using a broad-range (universal) probe and primers set. Microbiology 148, 257–266 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

47. Sayers, E. W. et al. Database resources of the National center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D20–d6 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

48. Alcock, B. P. et al. CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D690–d9 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

49. Zankari, E. et al. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 67, 2640–2644 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

50. SAS Institute. 9.4. Cary (SAS Institute Inc., 2013).

51. Service, N. P. National Park Service Visitor Use Statistics (National Park Service, Department of the Interior, 2024). https://irma.nps.gov

52. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 14.0 (2024).

53. Klindworth, A. et al. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e1–e (2012).

    Google Scholar 

54. Illumina. 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation. Preparing 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene Amplicons for the Illumina MiSeq System (2016).

55. Wood, D. E., Lu, J. & Langmead, B. Improved metagenomic analysis with kraken 2. Genome Biol. 20, 257 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

56. Pruitt, K. D., Tatusova, T., Brown, G. R. & Maglott, D. R. NCBI reference sequences (RefSeq): current status, new features and genome annotation policy. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D130–D135 (2012). Epub 20111124.

    Google Scholar 

57. kraken-biom. Enabling interoperative format conversion for Kraken results 1.2 (2016).

58. Andersen, K. S., Kirkegaard, R. H., Karst, S. M. & Albertsen, M. ampvis2: an R package to analyse and visualise 16S rRNA amplicon data. BioRxiv :299537 (2018).

59. R Core Team. R:A language and environment for statistical computing. 4.2.0: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ (2022).

60. Juul, S. et al. Validation and advantages of using novel RT-qPCR melting curve analysis assays for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Sci. Rep. 12, 13069 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

61. Scott, L. C. et al. Data for validation and application of standardized quantitative PCR assay for the assessment of antimicrobial resistance genes in surface water: U.S. Geological Survey data release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P14G9MJW (2025).

62. Bridle, H., Jacobsson, K. & Schultz, A. C. Chapter 4 – Sample processing. In: (ed Bridle, H.) Waterborne Pathogens (Second Edition): Academic; 63–109. (2021).

    Google Scholar 

63. Forés, E. et al. Evaluation of a virus concentration method based on ultrafiltration and wet foam elution for studying viruses from large-volume water samples. Sci. Total Environ. 829, 154431 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

64. USEPA. 1060 Collection and Preservation of Samples. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (American Public Health Association, 2017).

65. Amarasiri, M., Sano, D. & Suzuki, S. Understanding human health risks caused by antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARG) in water environments: current knowledge and questions to be answered. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 2016–2059 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

66. Goh, S. G. et al. Assessing the additional health burden of antibiotic resistant Enterobacteriaceae in surface waters through an integrated QMRA and DALY approach. J. Hazard. Mater. 458, 132058 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

67. Chettri, U., Nongkhlaw, M. & Joshi, S. R. Molecular evidence for occurrence of heavy metal and antibiotic resistance genes among predominant metal tolerant Pseudomonas sp. and Serratia sp. Prevalent in the Teesta river. Curr. Microbiol. 80, 226 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

68. Wang, P., Wu, D., You, X., Li, W. & Xie, B. Distribution of antibiotics, metals and antibiotic resistance genes during landfilling process in major municipal solid waste landfills. Environ. Pollut. 255, 113222 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

69. Blanco-Picazo, P. et al. Antibiotic resistance genes in phage particles from Antarctic and mediterranean seawater ecosystems. Microorganisms 8, 1293 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

70. Jang, J. et al. Abundance and diversity of antibiotic resistance genes and bacterial communities in the Western Pacific and Southern oceans. Sci. Total Environ. 822, 153360 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

71. Lu, J., Wu, J., Zhang, C., Wang, J. & He, X. Occurrence and possible sources of antibiotic resistance genes in seawater of the South China sea. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 18, 108 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

72. Scott, L. C. et al. Assessing visitor use impact on antibiotic resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes in soil and water environments of Rocky mountain National park. Sci. Total Environ. 785, 147122 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

73. Bengtsson-Palme, J., Kristiansson, E. & Larsson, D. G. J. Environmental factors influencing the development and spread of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 42 (2018).

Download references