Native alleles at lhcb6 shape photosynthetic efficiency and early growth in maize

1. McCouch, S. et al. Feeding the future. Nature 499, 23–24 (2013).

   Google Scholar 

2. Swarup, S. et al. Genetic diversity is indispensable for plant breeding to improve crops. Crop Sci. 61, 839–852 (2021).

   Google Scholar 

3. Mir, C. et al. Out of America: tracing the genetic footprints of the global diffusion of maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 126, 2671–2682 (2013).

   Google Scholar 

4. Gouesnard, B. et al. Genotyping-by-sequencing highlights original diversity patterns within a European collection of 1191 maize flint lines, as compared to the maize USDA genebank. Theor. Appl. Genet. 130, 2165–2189 (2017).

   Google Scholar 

5. Reif, J. C. et al. Trends in genetic diversity among European maize cultivars and their parental components during the past 50 years. Theor. Appl. Genet. 111, 838–845 (2005).

   Google Scholar 

6. Hartfield, M. & Otto, S. P. Recombination and hitchhiking of deleterious alleles. Evolution 65, 2421–2434 (2011).

   Google Scholar 

7. Lobell, D. B. & Tebaldi, C. Getting caught with our plants down: the risks of a global crop yield slowdown from climate trends in the next two decades. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 074003 (2014).

   Google Scholar 

8. Sharwood, R. E. et al. Mining for allelic gold: finding genetic variation in photosynthetic traits in crops and wild relatives. J. Exp. Bot. 73, 3085–3108 (2022).

   Google Scholar 

9. Theeuwen, T. P., Logie, L. L., Harbinson, J. & Aarts, M. G. Genetics as a key to improving crop photosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 73, 3122–3137 (2022).

   Google Scholar 

10. Khaipho-Burch, M. et al. Genetic modification can improve crop yields—but stop overselling it. Nature 621, 470–473 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

11. Hölker, A. C. et al. European maize landraces made accessible for plant breeding and genome-based studies. Theor. Appl. Genet. 132, 3333–3345 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

12. Mayer, M. et al. Discovery of beneficial haplotypes for complex traits in maize landraces. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–10 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

13. Liang, Y., Liu, H. J., Yan, J. & Tian, F. Natural variation in crops: realized understanding, continuing promise. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 72, 357–385 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

14. Hallauer, A. R. & Sears, J. Integrating exotic germplasm into corn belt maize breeding programs 1. Crop Sci. 12, 203–206 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

15. Strigens, A., Schipprack, W., Reif, J. C. & Melchinger, A. E. Unlocking the genetic diversity of maize landraces with doubled haploids opens new avenues for breeding. PloS One. 8, e57234 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

16. Sood, S., Flint-Garcia, S., Willcox, M. C. & Holland, J. B. Mining natural variation for maize improvement: selection on phenotypes and genes. Genomics of plant genetic resources: Managing, sequencing and mining genetic resources. 1, 615–649 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

17. Böhm, J., Schipprack, W., Utz, H. F. & Melchinger, A. E. Tapping the genetic diversity of landraces in allogamous crops with doubled haploid lines: a case study from European flint maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 130, 861–873 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

18. Urzinger, S. et al. Embracing native diversity to enhance the maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II in maize. Plant Physiol. 197, kiae670 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

19. Murchie, E. H. & Lawson, T. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: a guide to good practice and understanding some new applications. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 3983–3998 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

20. Ferguson, J. N. et al. A deficient CP24 allele defines variation for dynamic non-photochemical quenching and photosystem II efficiency in maize. Plant. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koaf063 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

21. Lainé, C. M., AbdElgawad, H. & Beemster, G. T. A meta-analysis reveals differential sensitivity of cold stress responses in the maize leaf. Plant. Cell. Environ. 46, 2432–2449 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

22. Burnett, A. C. & Kromdijk, J. Can we improve the chilling tolerance of maize photosynthesis through breeding? J. Exp. Bot. 73, 3138–3156 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

23. Long, S. P., Marshall-Colon, A. & Zhu, X. G. Meeting the global food demand of the future by engineering crop photosynthesis and yield potential. Cell 161, 56–66 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

24. Leister, D. Enhancing the light reactions of photosynthesis: Strategies, controversies, and perspectives. Mol. Plant. 16, 4–22 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

25. Fracheboud, Y., Ribaut, J. M., Vargas, M., Messmer, R. & Stamp, P. Identification of quantitative trait loci for cold-tolerance of photosynthesis in maize (Zea mays L). J. Exp. Bot. 53, 1967–1977 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

26. Fracheboud, Y., Jompuk, C., Ribaut, J., Stamp, P. & Leipner, J. Genetic analysis of cold-tolerance of photosynthesis in maize. Plant Mol. Biol. 56, 241–253 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

27. Hund, A. et al. QTL controlling root and shoot traits of maize seedlings under cold stress. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109, 618–629 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

28. Jompuk, C., Fracheboud, Y., Stamp, P. & Leipner, J. Mapping of quantitative trait loci associated with chilling tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings grown under field conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 56, 1153–1163 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

29. Unterseer, S. et al. A powerful tool for genome analysis in maize: development and evaluation of the high density 600 k SNP genotyping array. BMC Genom. 15, 1–15 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

30. Schwacke, R. et al. MapMan4: A Refined Protein Classification and Annotation Framework Applicable to Multi-Omics Data Analysis. Mol. Plant. 12, 879–892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2019.01.003 (2019). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/

    Google Scholar 

31. Unterseer, S. et al. A comprehensive study of the genomic differentiation between temperate Dent and Flint maize. Genome Biol. 17, 1–14 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

32. Mayer, M. et al. Genetic diversity of European maize landraces: Dataset on the molecular and phenotypic variation of derived doubled-haploid populations. Data Brief. 42, 108164 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

33. Strasser, R. J., Tsimilli-Michael, M. & Srivastava, A. in Chlorophyll a fluorescence: a signature of photosynthesis 321–362 (Springer, 2004).

34. White, S. W., Zheng, J., Zhang, Y. M. & Rock, C. O. The structural biology of type II fatty acid biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74, 791–831 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

35. Kromdijk, J. et al. Improving photosynthesis and crop productivity by accelerating recovery from photoprotection. Science 354, 857–861 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

36. Ali, W. et al. Quantitative genetics of photosynthetic trait variation in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 76, 4141–4153. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraf198 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

37. Murchie, E. H. & Ruban, A. V. Dynamic non-photochemical quenching in plants: from molecular mechanism to productivity. Plant J. 101, 885–896 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

38. Ishikawa, N. et al. NDH-Mediated Cyclic Electron Flow Around Photosystem I is Crucial for C4 Photosynthesis. Plant Cell Physiol. 57, 2020–2028. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcw127 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

39. Ricci, W. A. et al. Widespread long-range cis-regulatory elements in the maize genome. Nat. Plants. 5, 1237–1249. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0547-0 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

40. Savadel, S. D. et al. The native cistrome and sequence motif families of the maize ear. PLoS Genet. 17, e1009689. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009689 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

41. Ballottari, M., Girardon, J., Dall’Osto, L. & Bassi, R. Evolution and functional properties of photosystem II light harvesting complexes in eukaryotes. Biochim. et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics. 1817, 143–157 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

42. Iwai, M., Patel-Tupper, D. & Niyogi, K. K. Structural diversity in eukaryotic photosynthetic light harvesting. Annual Rev. Plant. Biology 75, 119–152 (2024).

43. Su, X. et al. Structure and assembly mechanism of plant C2S2M2-type PSII-LHCII supercomplex. Science 357, 815–820 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

44. Kovacs, L. et al. Lack of the light-harvesting complex CP24 affects the structure and function of the grana membranes of higher plant chloroplasts. Plant. Cell. 18, 3106–3120 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

45. Ilíková, I. et al. Towards spruce-type photosystem II: consequences of the loss of light-harvesting proteins LHCB3 and LHCB6 in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 187, 2691–2715 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

46. Sahay, S., Grzybowski, M., Schnable, J. C. & Głowacka, K. Genetic control of photoprotection and photosystem II operating efficiency in plants. New Phytol. 239, 1068–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18980 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

47. Sahay, S. et al. Nonphotochemical quenching kinetics GWAS in sorghum identifies genes that may play conserved roles in maize and Arabidopsis thaliana photoprotection. Plant. J. 119, 3000–3014. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.16967 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

48. Caffarri, S., Frigerio, S., Olivieri, E., Righetti, P. G. & Bassi, R. Differential accumulation of Lhcb gene products in thylakoid membranes of Zea mays plants grown under contrasting light and temperature conditions. Proteomics 5, 758–768 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

49. Kargul, J. & Barber, J. Photosynthetic acclimation: Structural reorganisation of light harvesting antenna–role of redox-dependent phosphorylation of major and minor chlorophyll a/b binding proteins. FEBS J. 275, 1056–1068 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

50. Pan, X. et al. Structure of the maize photosystem I supercomplex with light-harvesting complexes I and II. Science 360, 1109–1113 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

51. Kromdijk, J. & Walter, J. Relaxing non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) to improve photosynthesis in crops (Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, 2023).

52. Ganeteg, U., Kulheim, C., Andersson, J. & Jansson, S. Is each light-harvesting complex protein important for plant fitness? Plant Physiol. 134, 502–509 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

53. De Bianchi, S., Dall’Osto, L., Tognon, G., Morosinotto, T. & Bassi, R. Minor antenna proteins CP24 and CP26 affect the interactions between photosystem II subunits and the electron transport rate in grana membranes of Arabidopsis. Plant. Cell. 20, 1012–1028 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

54. Cheng, C. Y. et al. Araport11: a complete reannotation of the Arabidopsis thaliana reference genome. Plant J. 89, 789–804 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

55. Pan, X. et al. Structural basis of LhcbM5-mediated state transitions in green algae. Nat. Plants. 7, 1119–1131 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

56. Dunahay, T. G., Schuster, G. & Staehelin, L. A. Phosphorylation of spinach chlorophyll-protein complexes CPII*, but not CP29, CP27, or CP24, is phosphorylated in vitro. FEBS Lett. 215, 25–30 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

57. Tanaka, R. & Tanaka, A. Chlorophyll cycle regulates the construction and destruction of the light-harvesting complexes. Biochim. et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics. 1807, 968–976 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

58. Havaux, M., Dall’Osto, L. & Bassi, R. Zeaxanthin has enhanced antioxidant capacity with respect to all other xanthophylls in Arabidopsis leaves and functions independent of binding to PSII antennae. Plant Physiol. 145, 1506–1520 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

59. Bossmann, B., Knoetzel, J. & Jansson, S. Screening of chlorina mutants of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) with antibodies against light-harvesting proteins of PS I and PS II: absence of specific antenna proteins. Photosynth. Res. 52, 127–136 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

60. Tanaka, R. et al. Overexpression of chlorophyllide a oxygenase (CAO) enlarges the antenna size of photosystem II in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 26, 365–373 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

61. Diepenbrock, C. H. et al. Novel loci underlie natural variation in vitamin E levels in maize grain. Plant. Cell. 29, 2374–2392 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

62. Havaux, M., Eymery, F., Porfirova, S., Rey, P. & Dörmann, P. Vitamin E protects against photoinhibition and photooxidative stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant. Cell. 17, 3451–3469 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

63. Chen, Y. E. et al. The roles of Arabidopsis proteins of Lhcb4, Lhcb5 and Lhcb6 in oxidative stress under natural light conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 130, 267–276 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

64. Sheng, X., Liu, X., Cao, P., Li, M. & Liu, Z. Structural roles of lipid molecules in the assembly of plant PSII– LHCII supercomplex. Biophys. Rep. 4, 189–203 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

65. Mayer, M. et al. Is there an optimum level of diversity in utilization of genetic resources? Theor. Appl. Genet. 130, 2283–2295 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

66. Röber, F., Gordillo, G. & Geiger, H. In vivo haploid induction in maize-performance of new inducers and significance of doubled haploid lines in hybrid breeding. Maydica 50, 275–283 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

67. Grubbs, F.E. Procedures for Detecting Outlying Observations in Samples. Technometrics 11, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1969.10490657 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

68. Ritchie, S. W., Hanway, J. J., Benson, G. O. & Herman, J. C. How a corn plant develops (Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Cooperative Extension Service, 2005).

69. Zhou, X. & Stephens, M. Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies. Nat. Genet. 44, 821–824 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

70. Hölker, A. C. et al. Theoretical and experimental assessment of genome-based prediction in landraces of allogamous crops. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119, e2121797119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

71. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Stat. Soc.: Ser. B (Methodol.). 57, 289–300 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

72. Hill, W. G. & Robertson, A. Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 38, 226–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01245622 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

73. Logemann, J., Schell, J. & Willmitzer, L. Improved method for the isolation of RNA from plant tissues. Anal. Biochem. 163, 16–20 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

74. Brajkovic, S. et al. Getting ready for large-scale proteomics in crop plants. Nutrients 15, 783 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

75. Hufford, M. B. et al. De novo assembly, annotation, and comparative analysis of 26 diverse maize genomes. Science 373, 655–662 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

76. Tyanova, S., Temu, T. & Cox, J. The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 11, 2301–2319 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

77. Cheng, H., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X., Zhang, H. & Li, H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat. Methods. 18, 170–175. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-01056-5 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

78. Tang, H. et al. ALLMAPS: robust scaffold ordering based on multiple maps. Genome Biol. 16, 1–15 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

79. Haberer, G. et al. European maize genomes highlight intraspecies variation in repeat and gene content. Nat. Genet. 52, 950–957 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

80. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

81. Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 10, 421. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

82. Kurtz, S. et al. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 5, R12. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

83. Sievers, F. & Higgins, D. G. Clustal Omega for making accurate alignments of many protein sequences. Protein Sci. 27, 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3290 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

84. Knapp, S. J., Stroup, W. W. & Ross, W. M. Exact Confidence Intervals for Heritability on a Progeny Mean Basis. Crop Sci. 25, cropsci19850011183X002500010046x. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1985.0011183X002500010046x (1985).

    Google Scholar 

85. Hallauer, A., Carena, M. & Filho, J. B. Means and Variances in Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding (eds Carena, M., Hallauer, R. & Filho, J.B.) 33–67 (Springer New York, 2010).

86. Kenward, M. G. & Roger, J. H. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53, 983–997 (1997).

87. Schön, C. C. et al. Quantitative trait locus mapping based on resampling in a vast maize testcross experiment and its relevance to quantitative genetics for complex traits. Genetics 167, 485–498. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.167.1.485 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

88. Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database at 20 years: 2025 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D543–D553. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae1011 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references