Immunotolerant Oligomer scaffolds promote regenerative remodeling and improved muscle structure and function after volumetric muscle loss

immunotolerant-oligomer-scaffolds-promote-regenerative-remodeling-and-improved-muscle-structure-and-function-after-volumetric-muscle-loss
Immunotolerant Oligomer scaffolds promote regenerative remodeling and improved muscle structure and function after volumetric muscle loss

References

  1. Chi, D. et al. Free functional muscle transfer for lower extremity reconstruction. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 86, 288–299 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, Q. et al. Harnessing the synergy of perfusable muscle flap matrix and adipose-derived stem cells for prevascularization and macrophage polarization to reconstruct volumetric muscle loss. Bioact. Mater. 22, 588–614 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao, G. et al. Local muscle or myocutaneous flap transfer for emergent repair of Gustilo IIIB open tibiofibular fractures. Sci. Rep. 14, 25609 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Griepp, D. W. et al. Outcomes of gracilis free-flap muscle transfers and non-free-flap procedures for restoration of elbow flexion: A systematic review. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 75, 2625–2636 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Langridge, B., Griffin, M. & Butler, P. E. Regenerative medicine for skeletal muscle loss: A review of current tissue engineering approaches. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 32, 15 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gahlawat, S. et al. Tissue engineered 3D constructs for volumetric muscle loss. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 52, 2325–2347 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Greising, S. M., Corona, B. T., McGann, C., Frankum, J. K. & Warren, G. L. Therapeutic approaches for volumetric muscle loss injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Tissue Eng. Part B, Rev. 25, 510–525 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rose, L. F. et al. The convergence of regenerative medicine and rehabilitation: Federal perspectives. NPJ Regen. Med. 3, 19 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, C. & Gao, Y. The role of transmembrane proteins on force transmission in skeletal muscle. J. Biomech. 47, 3232–3236 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mukund, K. & Subramaniam, S. Skeletal muscle: A review of molecular structure and function, in health and disease. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 12, e1462 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sousa-Victor, P., García-Prat, L. & Muñoz-Cánoves, P. Control of satellite cell function in muscle regeneration and its disruption in ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 204–226 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaczmarek, A. et al. The role of satellite cells in skeletal muscle regeneration—The effect of exercise and age. Biology (Basel) 10, 1056 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Giannone, A. A. et al. Deconstruction of cellular dynamics after treatment of volumetric muscle loss injury with extracellular matrix. NPJ Regen. Med. 10, 45 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carnes, M. E. & Pins, G. D. Skeletal muscle tissue engineering: Biomaterials-based strategies for the treatment of volumetric muscle loss. Bioengineering (Basel) 7, 85 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smoak, M. M. & Mikos, A. G. Advances in biomaterials for skeletal muscle engineering and obstacles still to overcome. Mater. Today Bio. 7, 100069 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schiltz, L., Grivetti, E., Tanner, G. I. & Qazi, T. H. Recent advances in implantable biomaterials for the treatment of volumetric muscle loss. Cells Tissues Organs. 213, 486–502 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, Z., Liang, W., Ao, R. & An, Y. Adipose decellularized matrix: A promising skeletal muscle tissue engineering material for volume muscle loss. Biomater. Res. 29, 0174 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Urciuolo, A. et al. Decellularised skeletal muscles allow functional muscle regeneration by promoting host cell migration. Sci. Rep. 8, 8398 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yu, W. et al. Bioactive nanofiber-hydrogel composite regulates regenerative microenvironment for skeletal muscle regeneration after volumetric muscle loss. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 13, e2304087 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pollot, B. E., Rathbone, C. R., Wenke, J. C. & Guda, T. Natural polymeric hydrogel evaluation for skeletal muscle tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 106, 672–679 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kim, J. H. et al. 3D bioprinted human skeletal muscle constructs for muscle function restoration. Sci. Rep. 8, 12307 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Das, S. et al. Pre-innervated tissue-engineered muscle promotes a pro-regenerative microenvironment following volumetric muscle loss. Commun. Biol. 3, 330 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Quarta, M. et al. Bioengineered constructs combined with exercise enhance stem cell-mediated treatment of volumetric muscle loss. Nat. Commun. 8, 15613 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  24. McKellar, D. W. et al. Large-scale integration of single-cell transcriptomic data captures transitional progenitor states in mouse skeletal muscle regeneration. Commun. Biol. 4, 1280 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ruta, A., Krishnan, K. & Elisseeff, J. H. Single-cell transcriptomics in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Nat. Reviews Bioeng. 2, 101–119 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Oprescu, S. N., Yue, F., Qiu, J., Brito, L. F. & Kuang, S. Temporal dynamics and heterogeneity of cell populations during skeletal muscle regeneration. iScience 23, 100993 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Castor-Macias, J. A. et al. Reprogramming of myeloid responses to volumetric muscle loss via engineered protein nanoparticles. ACS Nano 19, 30441–30454 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kreger, S. T. et al. Polymerization and matrix physical properties as important design considerations for soluble collagen formulations. Biopolymers 93, 690–707 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bailey, J. L. et al. Collagen oligomers modulate physical and biological properties of three-dimensional self-assembled matrices. Biopolymers 95, 77–93 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Blum, K. M. et al. Acellular and cellular high-density, collagen-fibril constructs with suprafibrillar organization. Biomater. Sci. 4, 711–723 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Novak, T. et al. Mechanisms and microenvironment investigation of cellularized high density gradient collagen matrices via densification. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 2617–2628 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Buno, K. P. et al. In vitro multitissue interface model supports rapid vasculogenesis and mechanistic study of vascularization across tissue compartments. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 21848–21860 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Whittington, C. F., Yoder, M. C. & Voytik-harbin, S. L. Collagen-polymer guidance of vessel network formation and stabilization by endothelial colony forming cells in vitro. Macromol. Biosci. 13, 1135–1149 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Brookes, S., Voytik-Harbin, S., Zhang, H. & Halum, S. Three-dimensional tissue-engineered skeletal muscle for laryngeal reconstruction. Laryngoscope 128, 603–609 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sohutskay, D. O., Buno, K. P., Tholpady, S. S., Nier, S. J. & Voytik-Harbin, S. L. Design and biofabrication of dermal regeneration scaffolds: Role of oligomeric collagen fibril density and architecture. Regen Med. 15, 1295–1312 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Shay, E. O. et al. Scaffold-forming collagen and motor-endplate expressing muscle cells for porcine laryngoplasty. Laryngoscope 134, 4988–4997 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Puls, T. J. et al. Regenerative tissue filler for breast conserving surgery and other soft tissue restoration and reconstruction needs. Sci. Rep. 11, 2711 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Brookes, S. et al. Laryngeal reconstruction using tissue-engineered implants in pigs: A pilot study. Laryngoscope 131, 2277–2284 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wesson, T. et al. Multi-layered implant approach for hemilaryngectomy reconstruction in a porcine model. Laryngoscope 135, 769–778 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wesson, T. et al. Tissue-engineered implant for hemilaryngectomy reconstruction with recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Laryngoscope 134, 4604–4613 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Morrison, R. A. et al. Engineered collagen polymeric materials create noninflammatory regenerative microenvironments that avoid classical foreign body responses. Biomater. Sci. 11, 3278–3296 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Voytik-Harbin, S. L., Novak, T. A., Blum, K. & Neu, C. P. Collagen compositions and methods of use. United States Patent US11478574B2 (2022).

  43. Mintz, E. L., Passipieri, J. A., Lovell, D. Y. & Christ, G. J. Applications of in vivo functional testing of the rat tibialis anterior for evaluating tissue engineered skeletal muscle repair. J. Vis. Exp. 7, e54487 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gerlinger-Romero, F. et al. Non-invasive assessment of dorsiflexor muscle function in mice. J. Vis. Exp. 143, e58696 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cable, D. M. et al. Robust decomposition of cell type mixtures in spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 517–526 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Larouche, J. A. et al. Neutrophil and natural killer cell imbalances prevent muscle stem cell-mediated regeneration following murine volumetric muscle loss. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 119, e2111445119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Valentin, J. E., Stewart-Akers, A. M., Gilbert, T. W. & Badylak, S. F. Macrophage participation in the degradation and remodeling of extracellular matrix scaffolds. Tissue Eng. Part A. 15, 1687–1694 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Dolan, C. P., Dearth, C. L., Corona, B. T. & Goldman, S. M. Retrospective characterization of a rat model of volumetric muscle loss. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 23, 814 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Garg, K., Corona, B. T. & Walters, T. J. Losartan administration reduces fibrosis but hinders functional recovery after volumetric muscle loss injury. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 117, 1120–1131 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Aguilar, C. A. et al. Multiscale analysis of a regenerative therapy for treatment of volumetric muscle loss injury. Cell. Death Discov. 4, 33 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ward, C. L., Ji, L. & Corona, B. T. An autologous muscle tissue expansion approach for the treatment of volumetric muscle loss. Biores. Open Access. 4, 198–208 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Goldman, S. M. & Corona, B. T. Co-delivery of micronized urinary bladder matrix damps regenerative capacity of minced muscle grafts in the treatment of volumetric muscle loss injuries. PLoS One 12, e0186593 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Goldman, S. M., Henderson, B. E. P., Walters, T. J. & Corona, B. T. Co-delivery of a laminin-111 supplemented hyaluronic acid based hydrogel with minced muscle graft in the treatment of volumetric muscle loss injury. PLoS One 13, e0191245 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Garg, K., Ward, C. L., Rathbone, C. R. & Corona, B. T. Transplantation of devitalized muscle scaffolds is insufficient for appreciable de novo muscle fiber regeneration after volumetric muscle loss injury. Cell Tissue Res. 358, 857–873 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Corona, B. T. et al. Autologous minced muscle grafts: A tissue engineering therapy for the volumetric loss of skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 305, C761-75 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Aurora, A., Roe, J. L., Corona, B. T. & Walters, T. J. An acellular biologic scaffold does not regenerate appreciable de novo muscle tissue in rat models of volumetric muscle loss injury. Biomaterials 67, 393–407 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ma, J., Sahoo, S., Baker, A. R. & Derwin, K. A. Investigating muscle regeneration with a dermis/small intestinal submucosa scaffold in a rat full-thickness abdominal wall defect model. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 103, 355–364 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Corona, B. T. & Greising, S. M. Challenges to acellular biological scaffold mediated skeletal muscle tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 104, 238–246 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Valentin, J. E., Turner, N. J., Gilbert, T. W. & Badylak, S. F. Functional skeletal muscle formation with a biologic scaffold. Biomaterials 31, 7475–7484 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sicari, B. M. et al. An acellular biologic scaffold promotes skeletal muscle formation in mice and humans with volumetric muscle loss. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 234ra58 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Mase, V. J. et al. Clinical application of an acellular biologic scaffold for surgical repair of a large, traumatic quadriceps femoris muscle defect. Orthopedics 33, 511 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Dziki, J. et al. An acellular biologic scaffold treatment for volumetric muscle loss: Results of a 13-patient cohort study. NPJ Regen. Med. 1, 16008 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Larouche, J. A., Wallace, E. C., Spence, B. D., Buras, E. & Aguilar, C. A. Spatiotemporal mapping of immune and stem cell dysregulation after volumetric muscle loss. JCI Insight 8, e162835 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Girardi, F. et al. TGFβ signaling curbs cell fusion and muscle regeneration. Nat. Commun. 12, 750 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Aurora, A., Garg, K., Corona, B. T. & Walters, T. J. Physical rehabilitation improves muscle function following volumetric muscle loss injury. BMC Sports Sci. Med. Rehabil. 6, 41 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Badylak, S. F. The extracellular matrix as a biologic scaffold material. Biomaterials 28, 3587–3593 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Badylak, S. F., Dziki, J. L., Sicari, B. M., Ambrosio, F. & Boninger, M. L. Mechanisms by which acellular biologic scaffolds promote functional skeletal muscle restoration. Biomaterials 103, 128–136 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Greising, S. M. et al. Unwavering pathobiology of volumetric muscle loss injury. Sci. Rep. 7, 13179 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Badylak, S. F. Decellularized allogeneic and xenogeneic tissue as a bioscaffold for regenerative medicine: Factors that influence the host response. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 42, 1517–1527 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Leng, Y. et al. Extracellular matrix deposition precedes muscle-tendon integration during murine forelimb morphogenesis. Commun. Biol. 8, 1202 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Chal, J. & Pourquié, O. Making muscle: Skeletal myogenesis in vivo and in vitro. Development 144, 2104–2122 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Buckingham, M. et al. The formation of skeletal muscle: From somite to limb. J. Anat. 202, 59–68 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Lin, W. et al. Distinct roles of nerve and muscle in postsynaptic differentiation of the neuromuscular synapse. Nature 410, 1057–1064 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Liu, W. & Chakkalakal, J. V. The composition, development, and regeneration of neuromuscular junctions. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 126, 99–124 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Mayeuf-Louchart, A. et al. Notch regulation of myogenic versus endothelial fates of cells that migrate from the somite to the limb. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, 8844–8849 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Pepe, G. J. & Albrecht, E. D. Microvascular skeletal-muscle crosstalk in health and disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 10425 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

Download references