Auto-crosslinking sporesilk fibers promote endospore and Cry toxin clustering

Posted on
auto-crosslinking-sporesilk-fibers-promote-endospore-and-cry-toxin-clustering
Auto-crosslinking sporesilk fibers promote endospore and Cry toxin clustering

References

  1. Aronson, A. I., Beckman, W. & Dunn, P. Bacillus thuringiensis and related insect pathogens. Microbiol. Rev. 50, 1–24 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Musso, D., Ko, A. I. & Baud, D. Zika virus infection—after the pandemic. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 1444–1457 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jansen, C. C. & Beebe, N. W. The dengue vector Aedes aegypti: what comes next. Microbes Infect. 12, 272–279 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Phillips, M. A. et al. Malaria. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 3, 17050 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. McClintock, J. T., Schaffer, C. R. & Sjoblad, R. D. A comparative review of the mammalian toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis-based pesticides. Pestic. Sci. 45, 95–105 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Koch, M. S. et al. The food and environmental safety of Bt crops. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 283 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schnepf, E. et al. Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62, 775–806 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bravo, A., Gill, S. S. & Soberon, M. Mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry and Cyt toxins and their potential for insect control. Toxicon 49, 423–435 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Federici, B. A., Lüthy, P. & Ibarra, J. E. in Bacterial Control of Mosquitoes & Black Flies: Biochemistry, Genetics & Applications of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus (eds de Barjac, H. & Donald J. Sutherland, D. J.) 16–44 (Springer, 1990).

  10. Charles, J. F. & de Barjac, H. Electron microscope study of “Bacillus thuringiensis” var. “Israelensis” sporulation and crystal biogenesis (author’s transl). Ann. Microbiol. (Paris) 133, 425–442 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Arbour, C. A. et al. Defining early steps in Bacillus subtilis biofilm biosynthesis. mBio 14, e0094823 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rudd, S. R. et al. The parasporal body of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis: a unique phage capsid-associated prokaryotic insecticidal organelle. Biology 12, 1421 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, X. Python-based Helix Indexer: a graphical user interface program for finding symmetry of helical assembly through Fourier-Bessel indexing of electron microscopic data. Protein Sci. 31, 107–117 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pradhan, B. et al. Endospore Appendages: a novel pilus superfamily from the endospores of pathogenic Bacilli. EMBO J. 40, e106887 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sleutel, M. et al. Helical ultrastructure of the L-ENA spore aggregation factor of a Bacillus paranthracis foodborne outbreak strain. Nat. Commun. 15, 7514 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ben-Dov, E. et al. Refined, circular restriction map of the Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis plasmid carrying the mosquito larvicidal genes. Plasmid 42, 186–191 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Berry, C. et al. Complete sequence and organization of pBtoxis, the toxin-coding plasmid of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 5082–5095 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mistry, J. et al. Pfam: The protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D412–D419 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kang, H. J. & Baker, E. N. Intramolecular isopeptide bonds: protein crosslinks built for stress? Trends Biochem. Sci. 36, 229–237 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kang, H. J., Coulibaly, F., Clow, F., Proft, T. & Baker, E. N. Stabilizing isopeptide bonds revealed in gram-positive bacterial pilus structure. Science 318, 1625–1628 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lukaszczyk, M., Pradhan, B. & Remaut, H. The biosynthesis and structures of bacterial pili. Subcell. Biochem. 92, 369–413 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Griffin, M., Casadio, R. & Bergamini, C. M. Transglutaminases: nature’s biological glues. Biochem. J. 368, 377–396 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sierro, N., Makita, Y., de Hoon, M. & Nakai, K. DBTBS: a database of transcriptional regulation in Bacillus subtilis containing upstream intergenic conservation information. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D93–D96 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Estada, U. & Ferre, J. Binding of insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis to the midgut brush border of the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and selection for resistance to one of the crystal proteins. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 3840–3846 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Huessy, B., Bumann, D. & Ebert, D. Ectopical expression of bacterial collagen-like protein supports its role as adhesin in host–parasite coevolution. R. Soc. Open Sci. 11, 231441 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kalfon, A., Charles, J. F., Bourgouin, C. & de Barjac, H. Sporulation of Bacillus sphaericus 2297: an electron microscope study of crystal-like inclusion biogenesis and toxicity to mosquito larvae. J. Gen. Microbiol. 130, 893–900 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu, Y. et al. Gene clusters located on two large plasmids determine spore crystal association (SCA) in Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. finitimus strain YBT-020. PLoS ONE 6, e27164 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Duneau, D., Luijckx, P., Ben-Ami, F., Laforsch, C. & Ebert, D. Resolving the infection process reveals striking differences in the contribution of environment, genetics and phylogeny to host–parasite interactions. BMC Biol. 9, 11 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Henriques, A. O. & Moran, C. P. Jr. Structure, assembly, and function of the spore surface layers. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 61, 555–588 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Terry, C. et al. Molecular tiling on the surface of a bacterial spore—the exosporium of the Bacillus anthracis/cereus/thuringiensis group. Mol. Microbiol. 104, 539–552 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jamali, K. et al. Automated model building and protein identification in cryo-EM maps. Nature 628, 450–457 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 75, 861–877 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Williams, C. J. et al. MolProbity: more and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci. 27, 293–315 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Altenbuchner, J. Editing of the Bacillus subtilis genome by the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 5421–5427 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Park, J., Bae, S. & Kim, J. S. Cas-Designer: a web-based tool for choice of CRISPR-Cas9 target sites. Bioinformatics 31, 4014–4016 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Eddy, S. R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002195 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Johnson, M. et al. NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, W5–W9 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mirdita, M. et al. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Methods 19, 679–682 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, W78–W82 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ramnath, V. et al. A community-curated, global atlas of Bacillus cereus sensu lato genomes for epidemiological surveillance. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.20.572685 (2023).

  43. Gilchrist, C. L. M., Booth, T. J., van Wersch, B., van Grieken, L., Medema, M.H. & Chooi, Y.-H. cblaster: a remote search tool for rapid identification and visualisation of homologous gene clusters. Bioinform Adv. 1, vbab016 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jones, P. et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30, 1236–1240 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references