A hydro-topological strategy enables self-regulating biofilms for sustainable wastewater treatment

1. Sankara Narayan, A. et al. A portfolio approach to achieving universal sanitation. Nat. Water 2, 1044–1047 (2024).

   Google Scholar 

2. Xu, Z. et al. Assessing progress towards sustainable development over space and time. Nature 577, 74–78 (2020).

   Google Scholar 

3. Thacker, S. et al. Infrastructure for sustainable development. Nat. Sustain. 2, 324–331 (2019).

   Google Scholar 

4. Philip, L. Overlooking the critical nexus between water, sanitation, and health. Nat. Water 2, 1042–1043 (2024).

   Google Scholar 

5. Philipp, L., Bühler, K., Ulber, R. & Gescher, J. Beneficial applications of biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 22, 276–290 (2024).

   Google Scholar 

6. Alhajeri, N. S., Tawfik, A., Elsamadony, M. & Al-Fadhli, F. M. Moving bed biofilm reactor. Municipal Wastewater Treatment. 173–206 (Elsevier, 2025).

7. Leonhard, S. et al. Single-stage MBBR as post-treatment step for upgrading large WWTPs – experiences of one-year pilot plant operation. J. Water Process. Eng. 46, 102570 (2022).

   Google Scholar 

8. Raj, D. S. et al. Efficiency of various biofilm carriers and microbial interactions with substrate in moving bed-biofilm reactor for environmental wastewater treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 359, 127421 (2022).

   Google Scholar 

9. di Biase, A., Kowalski, M. S., Devlin, T. R. & Oleszkiewicz, J. A. Moving bed biofilm reactor technology in municipal wastewater treatment: a review. J. Environ. Manag. 247, 849–866 (2019).

   Google Scholar 

10. Sfetsas, T., Patsatzis, S. & Chioti, A. A review of 3D printing techniques for bio-carrier fabrication. J. Clean. Prod. 318, 128469 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

11. Proano-Pena, G., Carrano, A. L. & Blersch, D. M. Analysis of very-high surface area 3D-printed media in a moving bed biofilm reactor for wastewater treatment. PLoS One 15, 17 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

12. Bassin, J. P. et al. Effect of increasing organic loading rates on the performance of moving-bed biofilm reactors filled with different support media: Assessing the activity of suspended and attached biomass fractions. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 100, 131–141 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

13. Shi, W. et al. Porous polyurethane biocarriers could enhance system nitrification resilience under high organic loading by retaining key functional bacteria. Water Res 272, 122950 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

14. Ashkanani, A. et al. Bio-carrier and operating temperature effect on ammonia removal from secondary wastewater effluents using moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR). Sci. Total Environ. 693, 133425 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

15. Young, B. et al. Meso and micro-scale response of post carbon removal nitrifying MBBR biofilm across carrier type and loading. Water Res 91, 235–243 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

16. Nadell, C. D., Drescher, K. & Foster, K. R. Spatial structure, cooperation and competition in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 589 (2016).

17. Torresi, E. et al. Biofilm thickness influences biodiversity in nitrifying MBBRs—implications on micropollutant removal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 9279–9288 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

18. Torresi, E. et al. Diffusion and sorption of organic micropollutants in biofilms with varying thicknesses. Water Res. 123, 388–400 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

19. Sandeep, R. et al. Effect of biofilm thickness on the activity and community composition of phosphorus accumulating bacteria in a moving bed biofilm reactor. Water Res. 245, 120599 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

20. Suarez, C. et al. Thickness determines microbial community structure and function in nitrifying biofilms via deterministic assembly. Sci. Rep. 9, 5110 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

21. Forrest, D., Delatolla, R. & Kennedy, K. Carrier effects on tertiary nitrifying moving bed biofilm reactor: An examination of performance, biofilm and biologically produced solids. Environ. Technol. 37, 662–671 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

22. Stewart, P. S. Mini-review: convection around biofilms. Biofouling 28, 187–198 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

23. Hermansson, A., Jacobsson, S., de Jonge, N., Nielsen, J. L. & Morgan-Sagastume, F. Impact of the restraint of biofilm volume and thickness on the performance and microbial composition in anaerobic moving-bed biofilm reactors (AnMBBRs). J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 10, 107741 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

24. Abtahi, S. M. et al. Micropollutants removal in tertiary moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs): Contribution of the biofilm and suspended biomass. Sci. Total Environ. 643, 1464–1480 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

25. Piculell, M., Welander, P., Jonsson, K. & Welander, T. Evaluating the effect of biofilm thickness on nitrification in moving bed biofilm reactors. Environ. Technol. 37, 732–743 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

26. Hof, B., Westerweel, J., Schneider, T. M. & Eckhardt, B. Finite lifetime of turbulence in shear flows. Nature 443, 59–62 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

27. Wyss, H. M., Blair, D. L., Morris, J. F., Stone, H. A. & Weitz, D. A. Mechanism for clogging of microchannels. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 74, 61402 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

28. Barkley, D. et al. The rise of fully turbulent flow. Nature 526, 550–553 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

29. Li, X., Yuen, W., Morgenroth, E. & Raskin, L. Backwash intensity and frequency impact the microbial community structure and function in a fixed-bed biofilm reactor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 96, 815–827 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

30. Zheng, Z. et al. Enhanced denitrification and microbial mechanism in secondary effluent treatment using combined iron–carbon microelectrolysis and deep bed filters. ACS EST Water 5, 5648–5660 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

31. Feng, F., Taylor-Edmonds, L., Andrews, S. A. & Andrews, R. C. Impact of backwash on biofiltration-related nitrogenous disinfection by-product formation. Water Res. 174, 115641 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

32. Dan, Q., Zhang, Q., Wang, T., Wang, H. & Peng, Y. Floc management enables integrated anammox and enhanced biological phosphorus removal for sustainable ultra-efficient nutrient removal. Nat. Water 3, 201–210 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

33. Zhu, L. et al. Pollutant removal performance and microbial responses of pure moving bed biofilm reactor to the successional sulfadiazine exposure. J. Water Process. Eng. 51, 103427 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

34. Shao, S., Li, T., Shen, W., Wu, X. & Pan, D. Simultaneous denitrification and phosphorus removal by moving bed biofilm reactor: Performance and microbial community based on different carbon sources. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 13, 117025 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

35. Li, Z., Chen, H., Zhang, J., Peng, M. & Han, W. Combined application analysis of MBBR and magnetic coagulation process in a full-scale project. J. Water Process. Eng. 49, 102955 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

36. Nayeri, D., Khamutian, S. & Shokoohizadeh, M. J. A review on the effect of biofilm thickness in moving bed bioreactor for the nitrogen compounds removal. Desalin. Water Treat. 323, 101385 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

37. Rumbaugh, K. P. & Sauer, K. Biofilm dispersion. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 571–586 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

38. Asally, M. et al. Localized cell death focuses mechanical forces during 3D patterning in a biofilm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 18891–18896 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

39. McDougald, D., Rice, S. A., Barraud, N., Steinberg, P. D. & Kjelleberg, S. Should we stay or should we go: mechanisms and ecological consequences for biofilm dispersal. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 39–50 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

40. Zhang, M. et al. Combined effects of carbon source and C/N ratio on the partial denitrification performance: Nitrite accumulation, denitrification kinetic and microbial transition. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 12, 113343 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

41. Hou, Z. et al. Response of nitrite accumulation to elevated C/NO– 3-N ratio during partial denitrification process: Insights of extracellular polymeric substance, microbial community and metabolic function. Bioresour. Technol. 384, 129269 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

42. Dicataldo, G., Desmond, P., Al-Maas, M. & Adham, S. Feasibility and application of membrane aerated biofilm reactors for industrial wastewater treatment. Water Res. 280, 123523 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

43. Cao, Y. & Daigger, G. T. Use of the MABR fingerprint soft sensor to control biofilm thickness and optimize hybrid membrane aerated biofilm reactor (MABR) performance. Water Res. X 29, 100432 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

44. Guo, M., Zheng, X., Zheng, S., Luo, X. & Wang, Z. High organic volumetric loading rates triggered heterotrophic nitrification in wastewater biological nutrient removal systems. Bioresour. Technol. 421, 132132 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

45. Castrillo, M., Díez-Montero, R., Esteban-García, A. L. & Tejero, I. Mass transfer enhancement and improved nitrification in MABR through specific membrane configuration. Water Res. 152, 1–11 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

46. Badeti, U. et al. Source separation of urine and treatment: Impact on energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and decentralised wastewater treatment process. Desalination 583, 117633 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

47. Zhou, H. et al. Successful operation of nitrifying granules at low pH in a continuous-flow reactor: Nitrification performance, granule stability, and microbial community. J. Environ. Manag. 366, 121793 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

48. Rahimi, S., Modin, O. & Mijakovic, I. Technologies for biological removal and recovery of nitrogen from wastewater. Biotechnol. Adv. 43, 107570 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

49. de Celis, M. et al. Community successional patterns and inter-kingdom interactions during granular biofilm development. Npj Biofilms Microbomes 10, 109 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

50. Zhao, Q. et al. Pilot-scale implementation of mainstream anammox for municipal wastewater treatment against cold temperature. Nat. Commun. 15, 10314 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

51. Chen, X. et al. Uncovering pathway and mechanism of simultaneous thiocyanate detoxicity and nitrate removal through anammox and denitrification. NPJ Clean. Water 7, 109 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

52. Sabba, F., Picioreanu, C., Pérez, J. & Nerenberg, R. Hydroxylamine diffusion can enhance N₂O emissions in nitrifying biofilms: a modeling study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 1486–1494 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

53. Roothans, N. et al. Long-term multi-meta-omics resolves the ecophysiological controls of seasonal N₂O emissions during wastewater treatment. Nat. Water 3, 590–604 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

54. Sabba, F., Terada, A., Wells, G., Smets, B. F. & Nerenberg, R. Nitrous oxide emissions from biofilm processes for wastewater treatment. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 102, 9815–9829 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

55. Seviour, T. et al. Extracellular polymeric substances of biofilms: suffering from an identity crisis. Water Res 151, 1–7 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

56. Cai, Y., Boltz, J. P. & Rittmann, B. E. Modeling the performance of an anaerobic moving bed biofilm reactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 122, 1130–1141 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

57. Clescerl, L. S., Greenberg, A. E. & Eaton, A. D. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 20th Edition (American Public Health Association, 2005).

58. Yu, Y., Lee, C., Kim, J. & Hwang, S. Group-specific primer and probe sets to detect methanogenic communities using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 89, 670–679 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

Download references