A multi-way SMILES-based hypergraph inference network for metabolic model reconstruction

Posted on
a-multi-way-smiles-based-hypergraph-inference-network-for-metabolic-model-reconstruction
A multi-way SMILES-based hypergraph inference network for metabolic model reconstruction

References

  1. Thiele, I., Price, N. D., Vo, T. D. & Palsson, B. Ø Candidate metabolic network states in human mitochondria: Impact of diabetes, ischemia, and diet. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 11683–11695 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thiele, I., Jamshidi, N., Fleming, R. M. & Palsson, B. Ø Genome-scale reconstruction of Escherichia coli’s transcriptional and translational machinery: a knowledge base, its mathematical formulation, and its functional characterization. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000312 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, S. Y. & Kim, H. U. Systems strategies for developing industrial microbial strains. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1061–1072 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gu, C., Kim, G. B., Kim, W. J., Kim, H. U. & Lee, S. Y. Current status and applications of genome-scale metabolic models. Genome Biol. 20, 121 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lieven, C. et al. Memote for standardized genome-scale metabolic model testing. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 272–276 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Simeonidis, E. & Price, N. D. Genome-scale modeling for metabolic engineering. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 42, 327–338 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, B., Kim, W. J., Kim, D. I. & Lee, S. Y. Applications of genome-scale metabolic network model in metabolic engineering. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 42, 339–348 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Raškevičius, V. et al. Genome scale metabolic models as tools for drug design and personalized medicine. PloS One 13, e0190636 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robinson, J. L. & Nielsen, J. Anticancer drug discovery through genome-scale metabolic modeling. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 4, 1–8 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  10. King, Z. A. et al. Bigg models: a platform for integrating, standardizing and sharing genome-scale models. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D515–D522 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nielsen, J. & Keasling, J. D. Engineering cellular metabolism. Cell 164, 1185–1197 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, C., Liao, C. & Liu, Y.-Y. Teasing out missing reactions in genome-scale metabolic networks through hypergraph learning. Nat. Commun. 14, 2375 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, X. et al. A generalizable framework for unlocking missing reactions in genome-scale metabolic networks using deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.13259 (2024).

  14. Pan, S. & Reed, J. L. Advances in gap-filling genome-scale metabolic models and model-driven experiments lead to novel metabolic discoveries. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 51, 103–108 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Benedict, M. N., Mundy, M. B., Henry, C. S., Chia, N. & Price, N. D. Likelihood-based gene annotations for gap filling and quality assessment in genome-scale metabolic models. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003882 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Karp, P. D., Weaver, D. & Latendresse, M. How accurate is automated gap filling of metabolic models? BMC Syst. Biol. 12, 73 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Orth, J. D. & Palsson, B. Ø Systematizing the generation of missing metabolic knowledge. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 107, 403–412 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schroeder, W. L. & Saha, R. Optfill: a tool for infeasible cycle-free gapfilling of stoichiometric metabolic models. IScience 23, 100783 (2020).

  19. Prigent, S. et al. Meneco, a topology-based gap-filling tool applicable to degraded genome-wide metabolic networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005276 (2017).

  20. Satish Kumar, V., Dasika, M. S. & Maranas, C. D. Optimization based automated curation of metabolic reconstructions. BMC Bioinforma. 8, 212 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Henry, C. S. et al. High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 977–982 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Almeida, A. et al. A new genomic blueprint of the human gut microbiota. Nature 568, 499–504 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Machado, D., Andrejev, S., Tramontano, M. & Patil, K. R. Fast automated reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic models for microbial species and communities. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 7542–7553 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chen, C. & Liu, Y.-Y. A survey on hyperlink prediction. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 35, 15034–15050 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Feng, Y., You, H., Zhang, Z., Ji, R. & Gao, Y. Hypergraph neural networks. Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell. 33, 3558–3565 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bai, S., Zhang, F. & Torr, P. H. Hypergraph convolution and hypergraph attention. Pattern Recognit. 110, 107637 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chen, C., Surana, A., Bloch, A. M. & Rajapakse, I. Controllability of hypergraphs. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 8, 1646–1657 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chen, C. & Rajapakse, I. Tensor entropy for uniform hypergraphs. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 7, 2889–2900 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Berge, C. Hypergraphs: Combinatorics of Finite Sets Vol. 45 (Elsevier, 1984).

  30. Zhou, D., Huang, J. & Schölkopf, B. Learning with hypergraphs: clustering, classification, and embedding. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst. 19, 1601–1608 (2006).

  31. Gao, Y. et al. Hypergraph learning: methods and practices. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 44, 2548–2566 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang, M., Cui, Z., Jiang, S. & Chen, Y. Beyond link prediction: Predicting hyperlinks in adjacency space. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence Vol. 32, (2018).

  33. Sharma, G., Patil, P. & Murty, M. N. C3mm: clique-closure based hyperlink prediction. IJCAI 20, 3364–3370 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yadati, N. et al. Nhp: Neural hypergraph link prediction. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, 1705–1714 (2020).

  35. Chithrananda, S., Grand, G. & Ramsundar, B. Chemberta: large-scale self-supervised pretraining for molecular property prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.09885 (2020).

  36. Schwaller, P. et al. Mapping the space of chemical reactions using attention-based neural networks. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3, 144–152 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst. 30, 6000–6010 (2017).

  38. Magnúsdóttir, S. et al. Generation of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions for 773 members of the human gut microbiota. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 81–89 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Oyetunde, T., Zhang, M., Chen, Y., Tang, Y. & Lo, C. Boostgapfill: improving the fidelity of metabolic network reconstructions through integrated constraint and pattern-based methods. Bioinformatics 33, 608–611 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bernstein, D. B., Sulheim, S., Almaas, E. & Segrè, D. Addressing uncertainty in genome-scale metabolic model reconstruction and analysis. Genome Biol. 22, 64 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lü, W. et al. The formate channel foca exports the products of mixed-acid fermentation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 13254–13259 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  42. van ’t Hof, M. et al. High-quality genome-scale metabolic network reconstruction of probiotic bacterium Escherichia coli nissle 1917. BMC Bioinforma. 23, 566 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bu, X. et al. Engineering endogenous ABC transporter with improving ATP supply and membrane flexibility enhances the secretion of β-carotene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Biofuels 13, 168 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Danchin, A. Zinc, an unexpected integrator of metabolism? Microb. Biotechnol. 13, 895–898 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hastings, J. et al. The CHEBI reference database and ontology for biologically relevant chemistry: enhancements for 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D456–D463 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G. & Dean, J. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781 (2013).

  47. Gao, Y., Feng, Y., Ji, S. & Ji, R. Hgnn+: general hypergraph neural networks. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 45, 3181–3199 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jiang, J., Wei, Y., Feng, Y., Cao, J. & Gao, Y. Dynamic hypergraph neural networks. In IJCAI 2635–2641 (2019).

  49. Kim, S. et al. A survey on hypergraph neural networks: an in-depth and step-by-step guide. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 6534–6544 (2024).

  50. Yi, J. & Park, J. Hypergraph convolutional recurrent neural network. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 3366–3376 (2020).

  51. Chen, Y. & Zhao, Y. cyixiao/mushin: mushin (2026). Zenodo. Version v1.0. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18427362 (2026).

Download references