Air volume not spray concentration determines in vivo efficacy of volatile organic compounds against Plasmopara viticola

Posted on
air-volume-not-spray-concentration-determines-in-vivo-efficacy-of-volatile-organic-compounds-against-plasmopara-viticola
Air volume not spray concentration determines in vivo efficacy of volatile organic compounds against Plasmopara viticola

References

  1. Marchand, P. A. Evolution of plant protection active substances in Europe: the disappearance of chemicals in favour of biocontrol agents. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 30, 1–17 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sparks, T. C., Sparks, J. M. & Duke, S. O. Natural product-based crop protection compoundsorigins and future prospects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 71, 2259–2269 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lahlali, R. et al. Biological control of plant pathogens: A global perspective. Microorganisms 10 (2022).

  4. Pandit, M. A. et al. Major biological control strategies for plant pathogens. Pathogens (Basel Switzerland) 11 (2022).

  5. Ameye, M. et al. Priming of wheat with the green leaf volatile Z-3-hexenyl acetate enhances defense against Fusarium graminearum but boosts deoxynivalenol production. Plant Physiol. 167, 1671–1684 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Groenhagen, U. et al. Production of bioactive volatiles by different Burkholderia ambifaria strains. J. Chem. Ecol. 39, 892–906 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kai, M., Effmert, U., Berg, G. & Piechulla, B. Volatiles of bacterial antagonists inhibit mycelial growth of the plant pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Arch. Microbiol. 187, 351–360 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tenorio-Salgado, S., Tinoco, R., Vazquez-Duhalt, R., Caballero-Mellado, J. & Perez-Rueda, E. Identification of volatile compounds produced by the bacterium Burkholderia tropica that inhibit the growth of fungal pathogens. Bioengineered 4, 236–243 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Razo-Belman, R. & Ozuna, C. Volatile organic compounds: A review of their current applications as pest biocontrol and disease management. Horticulturae 9, 441 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brilli, F., Loreto, F. & Baccelli, I. Exploiting plant volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in agriculture to improve sustainable defense strategies and productivity of crops. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 264 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rowan, D. D. Volatile metabolites. Metabolites 1, 41–63 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Audrain, B., Farag, M. A., Ryu, C. M. & Ghigo, J. M. Role of bacterial volatile compounds in bacterial biology. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 39, 222–233 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Korpi, A., Järnberg, J. & Pasanen, A. L. Microbial volatile organic compounds. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 39, 139–193 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vivaldo, G., Masi, E., Taiti, C., Caldarelli, G. & Mancuso, S. The network of plants volatile organic compounds. Sci. Rep. 7, 11050 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Midzi, J. et al. Stress-induced volatile emissions and signalling in inter-plant communication. Plants (Basel Switzerland) 11 (2022).

  16. Dudareva, N., Klempien, A., Muhlemann, J. K. & Kaplan, I. Biosynthesis, function and metabolic engineering of plant volatile organic compounds. New Phytol. 198, 16–32 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guo, Y. et al. Trichoderma species differ in their volatile profiles and in antagonism toward ectomycorrhiza Laccaria bicolor. Front. Microbiol. 10, 891 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, F., Yang, X., Ran, W. & Shen, Q. Fusarium oxysporum induces the production of proteins and volatile organic compounds by Trichoderma harzianum T-E5. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 359, 116–123 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heil, M. & Bueno, J. C. S. Within-plant signaling by volatiles leads to induction. PNAS 104, 5467–5472 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hammerbacher, A., Coutinho, T. A. & Gershenzon, J. Roles of plant volatiles in defence against microbial pathogens and microbial exploitation of volatiles. Plant. Cell. Environ. 42, 2827–2843 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lazazzara, V. et al. Biogenic volatile organic compounds in the grapevine response to pathogens, beneficial microorganisms, resistance inducers, and abiotic factors. J. Exp. Bot. 73, 529–554 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Camacho-Coronel, X., Molina-Torres, J. & Heil, M. Sequestration of exogenous volatiles by plant cuticular waxes as a mechanism of passive associational resistance: A proof of concept. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 121 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Neri, F., Mari, M., Brigati, S. & Bertolini, P. Fungicidal activity of plant volatile compounds for controlling Monilinia laxa in stone fruit. Plant Dis. 91, 30–35 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Quintana-Rodriguez, E. et al. Plant volatiles cause direct, induced and associational resistance in common bean to the fungal pathogen Colletotrichum lindemuthianum. J. Ecol. 103, 250–260 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zou, X., Wei, Y., Zhu, J., Sun, J. & Shao, X. Volatile organic compounds of Scheffersomyces spartinae W9 have antifungal effect against Botrytis cinerea on strawberry fruit. Foods (Basel Switzerland). 12, 3619 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brambilla, A. et al. Immunity-associated volatile emissions of β-ionone and nonanal propagate defence responses in neighbouring barley plants. J. Exp. Bot. 73, 615–630 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Deshpande, S., Purkar, V. & Mitra, S. β-Cyclocitral, a master regulator of multiple stress-responsive genes in Solanum lycopersicum L. plants. Plants (Basel Switzerland). 10, 2465 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Frank, L. et al. Isoprene and β-caryophyllene confer plant resistance via different plant internal signalling pathways. Plant. Cell. Environ. 44, 1151–1164 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Riedlmeier, M. et al. Monoterpenes support systemic acquired resistance within and between plants. Plant. Cell. 29, 1440–1459 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rosenkranz, M., Chen, Y., Zhu, P. & Vlot, A. C. Volatile terpenes – mediators of plant-to-plant communication. Plant J. 108, 617–631 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Taniguchi, S., Takeda, A., Kiryu, M. & Gomi, K. Jasmonic acid-induced β-cyclocitral confers resistance to bacterial blight and negatively affects abscisic acid biosynthesis in rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 1704 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vlot, A. C. et al. Systemic propagation of immunity in plants. New Phytol. 229, 1234–1250 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Avesani, S., Lazazzara, V., Robatscher, P., Oberhuber, M. & Perazzolli, M. Volatile linalool activates grapevine resistance against downy mildew with changes in the leaf metabolome. Curr. Plant. Biology. 35–36, 100298 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Huang, M. et al. The major volatile organic compound emitted from Arabidopsis thaliana flowers, the sesquiterpene (E)-β-caryophyllene, is a defense against a bacterial pathogen. New Phytol. 193, 997–1008 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gessler, C., Pertot, I. & Perazzolli, M. Plasmopara viticola: a review of knowledge on downy mildew of grapevine and effective disease management. Phytopathologia Mediterranea. 50, 3–44 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Koledenkova, K. et al. Plasmopara viticola the causal agent of downy mildew of grapevine: from its taxonomy to disease management. Front. Microbiol. 13, 889472 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fontaine, M. C. et al. Genetic signature of a range expansion and leap-frog event after the recent invasion of Europe by the grapevine downy mildew pathogen Plasmopara viticola. Mol. Ecol. 22, 2771–2786 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Millardet, A. & Gayon, L. U. Traitement du mildiou par le mélange de sulphate de cuivre et chaux. J. Agric. Pratique. 49, 707–710 (1885).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fröbel, S. & Zyprian, E. Colonization of different grapevine tissues by Plasmopara viticola-A histological study. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 951 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Steimetz, E. et al. Influence of leaf age on induced resistance in grapevine against Plasmopara viticola. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 79, 89–96 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rumbolz, J. et al. Sporulation of Plasmopara viticola: Differentiation and light regulation. Plant Biol. 4, 413–422 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Peng, J. et al. Advances in understanding grapevine downy mildew: From pathogen infection to disease management. Mol. Plant Pathol. 25, e13401 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Clippinger, J. I. et al. Traditional and emerging approaches for disease management of Plasmopara viticola, causal agent of downy mildew of grape. Agriculture 14, 406 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Manghi, M. C. et al. The use of phosphonates in agriculture. Chemical, biological properties and legislative issues. Chemosphere 283, 131187 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Barmettler, E. et al. Double the trouble: High levels of both synthetic pesticides and copper in vineyard soils. Environ. Pollut. 375, 126356 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  46. La Torre, A., Righi, L., Iovino, V. & Battaglia, V. Evaluation of copper alternative products to control grape downy mildew in organic farming. J. Plant. Pathol. 101, 1005–1012 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Massi, F., Torriani, S. F. F., Borghi, L. & Toffolatti, S. L. Fungicide resistance evolution and detection in plant pathogens: Plasmopara viticola as a case study. Microorganisms 9, 119 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sharma, N. et al. Prevalence of mutations associated with QoIs, QiIs, QioSIs, and CAA fungicide resistance within Plasmopara viticola in North America and a tool to detect CAA-resistant isolates. Phytopathology 115, 495–506 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Cherrad, S. et al. New insights from short and long reads sequencing to explore cytochrome b variants in Plasmopara viticola populations collected from vineyards and related to resistance to complex III inhibitors. PloS One. 18, e0268385 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ghule, M. R., Sawant, I. S., Sawant, S. D. & Saha, S. Resistance of Plasmopara viticola to multiple fungicides in vineyards of Maharashtra, India. JEB 41, 1026–1033 (2020).

  51. Feng, X. & Baudoin, A. First report of carboxylic acid amide fungicide resistance in Plasmopara viticola (grapevine downy mildew) in North America. Plant. Health Progress. 19, 139 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gisi, U., Waldner, M., Kraus, N., Dubuis, P. H. & Sierotzki, H. Inheritance of resistance to carboxylic acid amide (CAA) fungicides in Plasmopara viticola. Plant. Pathol. 56, 199–208 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Commission, E. U. List of candidates for substitution (January 2015),Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2015/408 of 11 March 2015 on implementing Article 80(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament. (2015). Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32015R0408

  54. Commission, E. U. & Commission implementing regulation (EU). 2018/1981 of 13 December 2018 renewing the approval of the active substances copper compounds, as candidates for substitution, in accordance with regulation (EC) no 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the annex to commission implementing regulation (EU) No 540/2011, official journal of the European Union L317/16–317/18. (2018). Available at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/cy/eur/2018/1981

  55. Roda, R. et al. The effect of copper reduction on the control of downy mildew in Mediterranean grapevines. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 169, 529–542 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Tamm, L. et al. Use of copper-based fungicides in organic agriculture in twelve European countries. Agronomy 12, 673 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Chitarrini, G. et al. Identification of biomarkers for defense response to Plasmopara viticola in a resistant grape variety. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1524 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ricciardi, V. et al. From plant resistance response to the discovery of antimicrobial compounds: The role of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in grapevine downy mildew infection. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 160, 294–305 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Štambuk, P. et al. Croatian native grapevine varieties’ VOCs responses upon Plasmopara viticola inoculation. Plants (Basel Switzerland). 12, 404 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lazazzara, V. et al. Downy mildew symptoms on grapevines can be reduced by volatile organic compounds of resistant genotypes. Sci. Rep. 8, 1618 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Chitarrini, G. et al. Two-omics data revealed commonalities and differences between Rpv12- and Rpv3-mediated resistance in grapevine. Sci. Rep. 10, 12193 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Avesani, S. et al. Volatile 2-phenylethanol and β-cyclocitral trigger defense-related transcriptional and metabolic changes in grapevine leaves against downy mildew. Physiol. Plant. 177, e70412 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Valsesia, G. et al. Development of a high-throughput method for quantification of Plasmopara viticola DNA in grapevine leaves by means of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Phytopathology 95, 672–678 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 9, 676–682 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Busato, I. et al. A phytocomplex obtained from Salvia officinalis by cell culture technology effectively controls the grapevine downy mildew pathogen Plasmopara viticola. Plants (Basel Switzerland) 11 (2022).

  66. Berk, P., Hocevar, M., Stajnko, D. & Belsak, A. Development of alternative plant protection product application techniques in orchards, based on measurement sensing systems: A review. Comput. Electron. Agric. 124, 273–288 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Shen, Q. et al. Alleviating effects of linalool fumigation on Botrytis cinerea infections in postharvest tomato fruits. Horticulturae 8, 1074 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Xu, Y. et al. Unveiling the mechanisms for the plant volatile organic compound linalool to control gray mold on strawberry fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem. 67, 9265–9276 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Li, X. et al. Revealing the mechanisms for linalool antifungal activity against Fusarium oxysporum and its efficient control of fusarium wilt in tomato plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 458 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Hua, S. S. T., Beck, J. J., Sarreal, S. B. L. & Gee, W. The major volatile compound 2-phenylethanol from the biocontrol yeast, Pichia anomala, inhibits growth and expression of aflatoxin biosynthetic genes of Aspergillus flavus. Mycotoxin Res. 30, 71–78 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Zou, X. et al. ROS stress and cell membrane disruption are the main antifungal mechanisms of 2-phenylethanol against Botrytis cinerea. J. Agric. Food Chem. 70, 14468–14479 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Sun, S., Tang, N., Han, K., Wang, Q. & Xu, Q. Effects of 2-phenylethanol on controlling the development of Fusarium graminearum in wheat. Microorganisms 11, 2954 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Etminani, F., Harighi, B. & Mozafari, A. A. Effect of volatile compounds produced by endophytic bacteria on virulence traits of grapevine crown gall pathogen, Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Sci. Rep. 12, 10510 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Martelanc, M., Vukajlović, T. R., Sternad Lemut, M., Žežlina, L. & Butinar, L. Identification of volatile organic compounds as natural antifungal agents against Botrytis cinerea in grape-based systems. Foods (Basel Switzerland). 15, 119 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Sidorova, D. E. et al. The effect of volatile organic compounds on different organisms: Agrobacteria, plants and insects. Microorganisms 10, 69 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  76. von Arx, M., Schmidt-Büsser, D. & Guerin, P. M. Plant volatiles enhance behavioral responses of grapevine moth males, Lobesia botrana to sex pheromone. J. Chem. Ecol. 38, 222–225 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Tasin, M. et al. Volatiles of grape inoculated with microorganisms: Modulation of grapevine moth oviposition and field attraction. Microb. Ecol. 76, 751–761 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Papanastasiou, S. A., Ioannou, C. S. & Papadopoulos, N. T. Oviposition-deterrent effect of linalool – a compound of citrus essential oils – on female Mediterranean fruit flies, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). Pest Manag. Sci. 76, 3066–3077 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Strobel, G. A. et al. Synergism among volatile organic compounds resulting in increased antibiosis in Oidium sp. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 283, 140–145 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Hu, L., Ye, M. & Erb, M. Integration of two herbivore-induced plant volatiles results in synergistic effects on plant defence and resistance. Plant. Cell. Environ. 42, 959–971 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Ikawa, M., Sasner, J. J. & Haney, J. F. Activity of cyanobacterial and algal odor compounds found in lake waters on green alga Chlorella pyrenoidosa growth. Hydrobiologia 443, 19–22 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Sun, Q., Zhou, M. & Zuo, Z. Toxic mechanism of eucalyptol and β-cyclocitral on Chlamydomonas reinhardtii by inducing programmed cell death. J. Hazard. Mater. 389, 121910 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Xie, X., Zhang, H. & Paré, P. W. Sustained growth promotion in Arabidopsis with long-term exposure to the beneficial soil bacterium Bacillus subtilis (GB03). Plant Signal. Behav. 4, 948–953 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Girón-Calva, P. S., Molina-Torres, J. & Heil, M. Volatile dose and exposure time impact perception in neighboring plants. J. Chem. Ecol. 38, 226–228 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Sharifi, R. & Ryu, C. M. Biogenic volatile compounds for plant disease diagnosis and health improvement. Plant. Pathol. J. 34, 459–469 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Heuskin, S. et al. A semiochemical slow-release formulation in a biological control approach to attract hoverflies. Journal Environ. Ecology 3 (2011).

  87. Bakry, A. M. et al. Microencapsulation of oils: A comprehensive review of benefits, techniques, and applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 15, 143–182 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Marques, H. M. C. A review on cyclodextrin encapsulation of essential oils and volatiles. Flavour. Fragr. J. 25, 313–326 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Song, G. C. & Ryu, C. M. Two volatile organic compounds trigger plant self-defense against a bacterial pathogen and a sucking insect in cucumber under open field conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 9803–9819 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Kong, H. G., Shin, T. S., Kim, T. H. & Ryu, C. M. Stereoisomers of the bacterial volatile compound 2,3-butanediol differently elicit systemic defense responses of pepper against multiple viruses in the field. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 90 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Wang, M. et al. Leveraging air-borne VOC-mediated plant defense priming to optimize integrated pest management. J. Pest Sci. 97, 1245–1257 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Deng, W. et al. Volatile organic compounds of hoary stock are responsible for suppressing downy mildew of grape in an intercropping system. Phytopathology Research 7 (2025).

  93. Cape, N. J. Effects of airborne volatile organic compounds on plants. Environ. Pollut. 122, 145–157 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

Download references