Bacteria as living biosensors for DNA

1. Bahadır, E. B. & Sezgintürk, M. K. Applications of commercial biosensors in clinical, food, environmental, and biothreat/biowarfare analyses. Anal. Biochem. 478, 107–120 (2015).

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Clark, L. C. Jr & Lyons, C. Electrode systems for continuous monitoring in cardiovascular surgery. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 102, 29–45 (1962).

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Azimi, S., Farahani, A., Docoslis, A. & Vahdatifar, S. Developing an integrated microfluidic and miniaturized electrochemical biosensor for point of care determination of glucose in human plasma samples. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 413, 1441–1452 (2021).

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Zeng, N. & Xiang, J. Detection of KRAS G12D point mutation level by anchor-like DNA electrochemical biosensor. Talanta 198, 111–117 (2019).

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Lim, J. Y. & Lee, S. S. Sensitive detection of microRNA using QCM biosensors: sandwich hybridization and signal amplification by TiO₂ nanoparticles. Anal. Methods 12, 5103–5109 (2020).

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Geng, H. et al. Noble metal nanoparticle biosensors: from fundamental studies toward point-of-care diagnostics. Acc. Chem. Res. 55, 593–604 (2022).

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Bhardwaj, T., Ramana, L. N. & Sharma, T. K. Current advancements and future road map to develop ASSURED microfluidic biosensors for infectious and non-infectious diseases. Biosensors 12, 357 (2022).

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Justino, C. I., Duarte, A. C. & Rocha-Santos, T. A. Recent progress in biosensors for environmental monitoring: a review. Sensors 17, 2918 (2017).

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. McConnell, E. M., Nguyen, J. & Li, Y. Aptamer-based biosensors for environmental monitoring. Front. Chem. 8, 434 (2020).

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Li, J., Jiang, J., Su, Y., Liang, Y. & Zhang, C. A novel cloth-based supersandwich electrochemical aptasensor for direct, sensitive detection of pathogens. Anal. Chim. Acta 1188, 339176 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Lv, M. et al. Engineering nanomaterials-based biosensors for food safety detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 106, 122–128 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Lee, I., Probst, D., Klonoff, D. & Sode, K. Continuous glucose monitoring systems-Current status and future perspectives of the flagship technologies in biosensor research. Biosens. Bioelectron. 181, 113054 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Alharthi, S. D., Bijukumar, D., Prasad, S., Khan, A. M. & Mathew, M. T. Evolution in biosensors for cancers biomarkers detection: a review. J. Bio- Tribo-Corros. 7, 42 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Sassolas, A., Prieto-Simón, B. & Marty, J.-L. Biosensors for pesticide detection: new trends. Am. J. Anal. Chem. 3, 210–232 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Zhang, W., Asiri, A. M., Liu, D., Du, D. & Lin, Y. Nanomaterial-based biosensors for environmental and biological monitoring of organophosphorus pesticides and nerve agents. Trends Anal. Chem. 54, 1–10 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Jain, S. et al. Development of an antibody functionalized carbon nanotube biosensor for foodborne bacterial pathogens. J. Biosens. Bioelectron. 11, 002 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

17. Li, Y., Liu, X. & Lin, Z. Recent developments and applications of surface plasmon resonance biosensors for the detection of mycotoxins in foodstuffs. Food Chem. 132, 1549–1554 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. d’Oelsnitz, S., Love, J. D., Diaz, D. J. & Ellington, A. D. GroovDB: a database of ligand-inducible transcription factors. ACS Synth. Biol. 11, 3534–3537 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Liu, J. & Lu, Y. A colorimetric lead biosensor using DNAzyme-directed assembly of gold nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 6642–6643 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. Jiang, P. & Guo, Z. Fluorescent detection of zinc in biological systems: recent development on the design of chemosensors and biosensors. Coord. Chem. Rev. 248, 205–229 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. McNerney, M. P. et al. Point-of-care biomarker quantification enabled by sample-specific calibration. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax4473 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Hui, C., Guo, Y., Liu, L. & Yi, J. Recent advances in bacterial biosensing and bioremediation of cadmium pollution: a mini-review. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38, 9 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Jo, H. et al. Electrochemical aptasensor of cardiac troponin I for the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Anal. Chem. 87, 9869–9875 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Bezerra, G. et al. Electrochemical aptasensor for the detection of HER2 in human serum to assist in the diagnosis of early stage breast cancer. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 411, 6667–6676 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Javier, D. J., Nitin, N., Levy, M., Ellington, A. & Richards-Kortum, R. Aptamer-targeted gold nanoparticles as molecular-specific contrast agents for reflectance imaging. Bioconjugate Chem. 19, 1309–1312 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Valero, J. et al. A serum-stable RNA aptamer specific for SARS-CoV-2 neutralizes viral entry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2112942118 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Tombelli, S., Minunni, M., Luzi, E. & Mascini, M. Aptamer-based biosensors for the detection of HIV-1 Tat protein. Bioelectrochemistry 67, 135–141 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Yu, X., Chen, F., Wang, R. & Li, Y. Whole-bacterium SELEX of DNA aptamers for rapid detection of E. coli O157:H7 using a QCM sensor. J. Biotechnol. 266, 39–49 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Duan, N. et al. Selection and characterization of aptamers against Salmonella typhimurium using whole-bacterium systemic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX). J. Agric. Food Chem. 61, 3229–3234 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Gupta, N., Renugopalakrishnan, V., Liepmann, D., Paulmurugan, R. & Malhotra, B. D. Cell-based biosensors: recent trends, challenges and future perspectives. Biosens. Bioelectron. 141, 111435 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. Riglar, D. T. & Silver, P. A. Engineering bacteria for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 214–225 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. Inda, M. E. & Lu, T. K. Microbes as biosensors. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 74, 337–359 (2020). This review discusses considerations and capabilities for using bacteria as biosensors.

    Article  Google Scholar 

33. Chiang, A. J. & Hasty, J. Design of synthetic bacterial biosensors. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 76, 102380 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

34. Pham, H. L., Ling, H. & Chang, M. W. Design and fabrication of field-deployable microbial biosensing devices. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 76, 102731 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

35. Armstrong, A. & Isalan, M. Engineering bacterial theranostics: from logic gates to in vivo applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 12, 1437301 (2024). This review describes recent advances in bacterial theranostics.

    Article  Google Scholar 

36. Richard, H. T. & Foster, J. W. Acid resistance in Escherichia coli. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 52, 167–186 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

37. Winkler, J. D., Garcia, C., Olson, M., Callaway, E. & Kao, K. C. Evolved osmotolerant Escherichia coli mutants frequently exhibit defective N-acetylglucosamine catabolism and point mutations in cell shape-regulating protein MreB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 3729–3740 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. Chien, T. et al. Enhancing the tropism of bacteria via genetically programmed biosensors. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 6, 94–104 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

39. Jiao, C. et al. RNA recording in single bacterial cells using reprogrammed tracrRNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1107–1116 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

40. Schmidt, F., Cherepkova, M. Y. & Platt, R. J. Transcriptional recording by CRISPR spacer acquisition from RNA. Nature 562, 380–385 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

41. Parker, M. L., Rubien, J., McCormick, D. & Li, G.-W. Molecular time capsules enable transcriptomic recording in living cells. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.12.562053 (2023).

42. Schmidt, F. et al. Noninvasive assessment of gut function using transcriptional recording sentinel cells. Science 376, eabm6038 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

43. Shen, H. et al. Engineered microbial systems for advanced drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 187, 114364 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

44. Alexandrov, L. B. et al. The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer. Nature 578, 94–101 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

45. Zhang, J. Y., Bender, A. T., Boyle, D. S., Drain, P. K. & Posner, J. D. Current state of commercial point-of-care nucleic acid tests for infectious diseases. Analyst 146, 2449–2462 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

46. Kumar, K. R., Cowley, M. J. & Davis, R. L. Next-generation sequencing and emerging technologies. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 50, 1026–1038 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

47. Valentin, T. et al. Prospective evaluation of three rapid molecular tests for seasonal influenza in patients presenting at an emergency unit. J. Clin. Virol. 111, 29–32 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

48. Leber, A. L. et al. Multicenter evaluation of BioFire FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel for detection of bacteria, viruses, and yeast in cerebrospinal fluid specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 54, 2251–2261 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

49. Land, K. J., Boeras, D. I., Chen, X.-S., Ramsay, A. R. & Peeling, R. W. Reassured diagnostics to inform disease control strategies, strengthen health systems and improve patient outcomes. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 46–54 (2019). This perspective lays out the REASSURED criteria for ideal point-of-care diagnostic tests.

    Article  Google Scholar 

50. Makarova, K. S. et al. An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR–Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 722–736 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

51. Kaminski, M. M., Abudayyeh, O. O., Gootenberg, J. S., Zhang, F. & Collins, J. J. CRISPR-based diagnostics. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 643–656 (2021). This review examines in vitro CRISPR–Cas-based diagnostic devices.

    Article  Google Scholar 

52. Singh, S. et al. Crispr-Cas based biosensing: a fast-expanding molecular diagnostic tool. Microchem. J. 200, 110421 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

53. Gasiunas, G., Barrangou, R., Horvath, P. & Siksnys, V. Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2579–E2586 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

54. Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

55. Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas Systems. Science 339, 819–823 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

56. Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823–826 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

57. Gootenberg, J. S. et al. Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2. Science 356, 438–442 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

58. Chen, J. S. et al. CRISPR-Cas12a target binding unleashes indiscriminate single-stranded DNase activity. Science 360, 436–439 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

59. Hadi, R., Poddar, A., Sonnaila, S., Bhavaraju, V. S. M. & Agrawal, S. Advancing CRISPR-based solutions for COVID-19 diagnosis and therapeutics. Cells 13, 1794 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

60. Joung, J. et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 with SHERLOCK one-pot testing. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 1492–1494 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

61. Broughton, J. P. et al. CRISPR–Cas12-based detection of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 870–874 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

62. Cooper, R. M. et al. Engineered bacteria detect tumor DNA. Science 381, 682–686 (2023). This article reports A. baylyi as DNA biosensor using a deletion-of-repressor approach, showing that it can detect donor DNA cassettes spontaneously released from tumour cells in the mouse colon.

    Article  Google Scholar 

63. Cheng, Y.-Y. et al. Programming bacteria for multiplexed DNA detection. Nat. Commun. 14, 2001 (2023). This article reports on B. subtilis as DNA biosensor using both a deletion-of-repressor and deletion-of-toxin approach, demonstrating that it can detect target bacteria spiked into unpurified cecal contents.

    Article  Google Scholar 

64. Nou, X. A. & Voigt, C. A. Sentinel cells programmed to respond to environmental DNA including human sequences. Nat. Chem. 20, 211–220 (2024). This article reports B. subtilis as DNA biosensor using a deletion-of-terminator approach, showing that it can detect multiple targets using an AND gate.

    Article  Google Scholar 

65. Tellechea-Luzardo, J., Stiebritz, M. T. & Carbonell, P. Transcription factor-based biosensors for screening and dynamic regulation. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11, 1118702 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

66. Vaaben, T. H., Vazquez-Uribe, R. & Sommer, M. O. A. Characterization of eight bacterial biosensors for microbial diagnostic and therapeutic applications. ACS Synth. Biol. 11, 4184–4192 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

67. Charbonneau, M. R., Isabella, V. M., Li, N. & Kurtz, C. B. Developing a new class of engineered live bacterial therapeutics to treat human diseases. Nat. Commun. 11, 1738 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

68. Hahn, J. et al. Bacterial therapies at the interface of synthetic biology and nanomedicine. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2, 120–135 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

69. Graham, G. et al. Genome-scale transcriptional dynamics and environmental biosensing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 3301–3306 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

70. Courbet, A., Endy, D., Renard, E., Molina, F. & Bonnet, J. Detection of pathological biomarkers in human clinical samples via amplifying genetic switches and logic gates. Sci. Transl. Med. 7, 289ra83 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

71. Amrofell, M. B., Rottinghaus, A. G. & Moon, T. S. Engineering microbial diagnostics and therapeutics with smart control. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 66, 11–17 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

72. Wang, B., Kitney, R. I., Joly, N. & Buck, M. Engineering modular and orthogonal genetic logic gates for robust digital-like synthetic biology. Nat. Commun. 2, 508 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

73. Kitada, T., DiAndreth, B., Teague, B. & Weiss, R. Programming gene and engineered-cell therapies with synthetic biology. Science 359, eaad1067 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

74. Bulter, T. et al. Design of artificial cell-cell communication using gene and metabolic networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 101, 2299–2304 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

75. Wan, X. et al. Cascaded amplifying circuits enable ultrasensitive cellular sensors for toxic metals. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 540–548 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

76. Stricker, J. et al. A fast, robust and tunable synthetic gene oscillator. Nature 456, 516–519 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

77. Becskei, A., Séraphin, B. & Serrano, L. Positive feedback in eukaryotic gene networks: cell differentiation by graded to binary response conversion. EMBO J. 20, 2528–2535 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

78. Müller, M. et al. Designed cell consortia as fragrance-programmable analog-to-digital converters. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 309–316 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

79. Kotula, J. W. et al. Programmable bacteria detect and record an environmental signal in the mammalian gut. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 111, 4838–4843 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

80. Riglar, D. T. et al. Engineered bacteria can function in the mammalian gut long-term as live diagnostics of inflammation. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 653–658 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

81. Naydich, A. D. et al. Synthetic gene circuits enable systems-level biosensor trigger discovery at the host-microbe interface. mSystems 4, e00125–19 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

82. Nakamura, M. et al. Anti-CRISPR-mediated control of gene editing and synthetic circuits in eukaryotic cells. Nat. Commun. 10, 194 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

83. Xie, M. & Fussenegger, M. Designing cell function: assembly of synthetic gene circuits for cell biology applications. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 507–525 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

84. Bradley, R. W., Buck, M. & Wang, B. Tools and principles for microbial gene circuit engineering. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 862–888 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

85. Munkler, L. P. et al. Genetic heterogeneity of engineered Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 strains during scale-up simulation. Metab. Eng. 85, 159–166 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

86. Phaneuf, P. V. et al. Escherichia coli data-driven strain design using aggregated adaptive Laboratory evolution mutational data. ACS Synth. Biol. 10, 3379–3395 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

87. Meyer, A. J., Segall-Shapiro, T. H., Glassey, E., Zhang, J. & Voigt, C. A. Escherichia coli “marionette” strains with 12 highly optimized small-molecule sensors. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 196–204 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

88. Sandberg, T. E., Salazar, M. J., Weng, L. L., Palsson, B. O. & Feist, A. M. The emergence of adaptive laboratory evolution as an efficient tool for biological discovery and industrial biotechnology. Metab. Eng. 56, 1–16 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

89. Miller, C. A., Ho, J. M. & Bennett, M. R. Strategies for improving small-molecule biosensors in bacteria. Biosensors 12, 64 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

90. Li, S. et al. Directed evolution of TetR for constructing sensitive and broad-spectrum tetracycline antibiotics whole-cell biosensor. J. Hazard. Mater. 460, 132311 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

91. Chang, H.-J. et al. Programmable receptors enable bacterial biosensors to detect pathological biomarkers in clinical samples. Nat. Commun. 12, 5216 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

92. Chiang, A. J. et al. Evolved microbial diversity enables combinatoric biosensing in complex environments. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.24.645055 (2025).

93. Danino, T. et al. Programmable probiotics for detection of cancer in urine. Sci. Transl. Med. 7, 289ra84 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

94. Gurbatri, C. R., Arpaia, N. & Danino, T. Engineering bacteria as interactive cancer therapies. Science 378, 858–864 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

95. Li, S. et al. Oral delivery of bacteria: basic principles and biomedical applications. J. Control. Release 327, 801–833 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

96. Drees, J. J., Mertensotto, M. J., Augustin, L. B., Schottel, J. L. & Saltzman, D. A. Vasculature disruption enhances bacterial targeting of autochthonous tumors. J. Cancer 6, 843–848 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

97. Din, M. O. et al. Synchronized cycles of bacterial lysis for in vivo delivery. Nature 536, 81–85 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

98. Chien, T., Doshi, A. & Danino, T. Advances in bacterial cancer therapies using synthetic biology. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 5, 1–8 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

99. Gurbatri, C. R. et al. Engineering tumor-colonizing E. coli Nissle 1917 for detection and treatment of colorectal neoplasia. Nat. Commun. 15, 646 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

100. Mimee, M. et al. An ingestible bacterial-electronic system to monitor gastrointestinal health. Science 360, 915–918 (2018).

     Article  Google Scholar 

101. Daeffler, K. N.-M. et al. Engineering bacterial thiosulfate and tetrathionate sensors for detecting gut inflammation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 13, 923 (2017).

     Article  Google Scholar 

102. Zou, Z.-P., Du, Y., Fang, T.-T., Zhou, Y. & Ye, B.-C. Biomarker-responsive engineered probiotic diagnoses, records, and ameliorates inflammatory bowel disease in mice. Cell Host Microbe 31, 199–212.e5 (2023).

     Article  Google Scholar 

103. Leventhal, D. S. et al. Immunotherapy with engineered bacteria by targeting the sting pathway for anti-tumor immunity. Nat. Commun. 11, 2739 (2020).

     Article  Google Scholar 

104. Mao, N., Cubillos-Ruiz, A., Cameron, D. E. & Collins, J. J. Probiotic strains detect and suppress cholera in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaao2586 (2018).

     Article  Google Scholar 

105. Renella, G. & Giagnoni, L. Light dazzles from the black box: whole-cell biosensors are ready to inform on fundamental soil biological processes. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 3, 8 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

106. Moraskie, M. et al. Microbial whole-cell biosensors: current applications, challenges, and future perspectives. Biosens. Bioelectron. 191, 113359 (2021).

     Article  Google Scholar 

107. Chen, S., Chen, X., Su, H., Guo, M. & Liu, H. Advances in synthetic-biology-based whole-cell biosensors: Principles, genetic modules, and applications in food safety. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 7989 (2023).

     Article  Google Scholar 

108. Liu, C. et al. Engineering whole-cell microbial biosensors: design principles and applications in monitoring and treatment of heavy metals and organic pollutants. Biotechnol. Adv. 60, 108019 (2022).

     Article  Google Scholar 

109. Muñoz-Martín, M. A., Mateo, P., Leganés, F. & Fernández-Piñas, F. A battery of bioreporters of nitrogen bioavailability in aquatic ecosystems based on cyanobacteria. Sci. Total. Environ. 475, 169–179 (2014).

     Article  Google Scholar 

110. Cardemil, C. V., Smulski, D. R., LaRossa, R. A. & Vollmer, A. C. Bioluminescent Escherichia coli strains for the quantitative detection of phosphate and ammonia in coastal and suburban watersheds. DNA Cell Biol. 29, 519–531 (2010).

     Article  Google Scholar 

111. Kang, Y. et al. Enhancing the copper-sensing capability of Escherichia coli-based whole-cell bioreporters by genetic engineering. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 102, 1513–1521 (2018).

     Article  Google Scholar 

112. Liu, P., Huang, Q. & Chen, W. Construction and application of a zinc-specific biosensor for assessing the immobilization and bioavailability of zinc in different soils. Environ. Pollut. 164, 66–72 (2012).

     Article  Google Scholar 

113. Jia, X., Zhao, T., Liu, Y., Bu, R. & Wu, K. Gene circuit engineering to improve the performance of a whole-cell lead biosensor. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 365, fny157 (2018).

     Article  Google Scholar 

114. Wang, B., Barahona, M. & Buck, M. A modular cell-based biosensor using engineered genetic logic circuits to detect and integrate multiple environmental signals. Biosens. Bioelectron. 40, 368–376 (2013).

     Article  Google Scholar 

115. Whangsuk, W., Thiengmag, S., Dubbs, J., Mongkolsuk, S. & Loprasert, S. Specific detection of the pesticide chlorpyrifos by a sensitive genetic-based whole cell biosensor. Anal. Biochem. 493, 11–13 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

116. Chong, H. & Ching, C. B. Development of colorimetric-based whole-cell biosensor for organophosphorus compounds by engineering transcription regulator DmpR. ACS Synth. Biol. 5, 1290–1298 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

117. Riangrungroj, P., Bever, C. S., Hammock, B. D. & Polizzi, K. M. A label-free optical whole-cell Escherichia coli biosensor for the detection of pyrethroid insecticide exposure. Sci. Rep. 9, 12466 (2019).

     Article  Google Scholar 

118. Tecon, R. et al. Development of a multistrain bacterial bioreporter platform for the monitoring of hydrocarbon contaminants in marine environments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 1049–1055 (2010).

     Article  Google Scholar 

119. Hernández-Śanchez, V., Molina, L., Ramos, J. L. & Segura, A. New family of biosensors for monitoring BTX in aquatic and edaphic environments. Microb. Biotechnol. 9, 858–867 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

120. Song, Y. et al. A whole-cell bioreporter approach for the genotoxicity assessment of bioavailability of toxic compounds in contaminated soil in China. Environ. Pollut. 195, 178–184 (2014).

     Article  Google Scholar 

121. Kutraite, I. & Malys, N. Development and application of whole-cell biosensors for the detection of gallic acid. ACS Synth. Biol. 12, 533–543 (2023).

     Article  Google Scholar 

122. Wu, W. et al. Genetically assembled fluorescent biosensor for in situ detection of bio-synthesized alkanes. Sci. Rep. 5, 10907 (2015).

     Article  Google Scholar 

123. Renda, B. A., Dasgupta, A., Leon, D. & Barrick, J. E. Genome instability mediates the loss of key traits by Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1 during laboratory evolution. J. Bacteriol. 197, 872–881 (2015).

     Article  Google Scholar 

124. Dubnau, D. & Blokesch, M. Mechanisms of DNA uptake by naturally competent bacteria. Annu. Rev. Genet. 53, 217–237 (2019). This review describes DNA uptake by naturally competent bacteria.

     Article  Google Scholar 

125. Cooper, R. M., Tsimring, L. & Hasty, J. Inter-species population dynamics enhance microbial horizontal gene transfer and spread of antibiotic resistance. eLife 6, e25950 (2017).

     Article  Google Scholar 

126. Ghahfarokhi, S. M. A. T. & Peña-Castillo, L. BacTermFinder: a comprehensive and general bacterial terminator finder using a CNN ensemble. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 7, lqaf016 (2025).

     Article  Google Scholar 

127. Larson, M. H. et al. CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2180–2196 (2013).

     Article  Google Scholar 

128. Cooper, R. M. & Hasty, J. CRISPR-Cas inhibits natural transformation through altruistic group defense and self-sacrifice. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.16.460680 (2021).

129. Li, S.-Y. et al. CRISPR-Cas12a-assisted nucleic acid detection. Cell Discov. 4, 20 (2018).

     Article  Google Scholar 

130. Li, L. et al. HOLMESv2: a CRISPR-Cas12b-assisted platform for nucleic acid detection and DNA methylation quantitation. ACS Synth. Biol. 8, 2228–2237 (2019).

     Article  Google Scholar 

131. Palmen, R., Buijsman, P. & Hellingwerf, K. J. Physiological regulation of competence induction for natural transformation in Acinetobacter calcoaceticus. Arch. Microbiol. 162, 344–351 (1994).

     Article  Google Scholar 

132. Suárez, G. A., Renda, B. A., Dasgupta, A. & Barrick, J. E. Reduced mutation rate and increased transformability of transposon-free Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1-ISx. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83, e01025-17 (2017).

     Article  Google Scholar 

133. Halvorsen, E. M., Williams, J. J., Bhimani, A. J., Billings, E. A. & Hergenrother, P. J. Txe, an endoribonuclease of the enterococcal Axe–Txe toxin–antitoxin system, cleaves mRNA and inhibits protein synthesis. Microbiology 157, 387–397 (2011).

     Article  Google Scholar 

134. Cooper, R. M. & Hasty, J. One-Day construction of multiplex arrays to harness natural CRISPR-CAS systems. ACS Synth. Biol. 9, 1129–1137 (2020).

     Article  Google Scholar 

135. Zhang, J. et al. The international cancer genome consortium data portal. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 367–369 (2019).

     Article  Google Scholar 

136. Lau, C.H., Huang, S. & Zhu, H. Amplification-free nucleic acids detection with next-generation CRISPR/dx systems. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 45, 859–866 (2025).

     Article  Google Scholar 

137. Grinstein, J. D. Sherlock biosciences acquires sense biodetection to commercialize disposable CRISPR-based diagnostics. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. News 5, 124–127 (2023).

     Google Scholar 

138. Zhou, W. et al. A CRISPR–Cas9-triggered strand displacement amplification method for ultrasensitive DNA detection. Nat. Commun. 9, 5012 (2018).

     Article  Google Scholar 

139. Zhang, Y. et al. Paired design of dCas9 as a systematic platform for the detection of featured nucleic acid sequences in pathogenic strains. ACS Synth. Biol. 6, 211–216 (2017).

     Article  Google Scholar 

140. Pardee, K. et al. Rapid, low-cost detection of Zika virus using programmable biomolecular components. Cell 165, 1255–1266 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

141. Yuan, C. et al. Universal and naked-eye gene detection platform based on the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas12a/13a system. Anal. Chem. 92, 4029–4037 (2020).

     Article  Google Scholar 

142. Gootenberg, J. S. et al. Multiplexed and portable nucleic acid detection platform with Cas13, Cas12a, and Csm6. Science 360, 439–444 (2018).

     Article  Google Scholar 

143. Teng, F. et al. CDetection: CRISPR-Cas12b-based DNA detection with sub-attomolar sensitivity and single-base specificity. Genome Biol. 20, 132 (2019).

     Article  Google Scholar 

144. Azhar, M. et al. Rapid and accurate nucleobase detection using FnCas9 and its application in COVID-19 diagnosis. Biosens. Bioelectron. 183, 113207 (2021).

     Article  Google Scholar 

145. Zhou, S. et al. Endonuclease-assisted PAM-free recombinase polymerase amplification coupling with CRISPR/Cas12a (E-PfRPA/Cas) for sensitive detection of DNA methylation. ACS Sens. 7, 3032–3040 (2022).

     Article  Google Scholar 

146. Karvelis, T. et al. PAM recognition by miniature CRISPR-Cas12f nucleases triggers programmable double-stranded DNA target cleavage. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 5016–5023 (2020).

     Article  Google Scholar 

147. Lee, Y. et al. Fabrication of ultrasensitive electrochemical biosensor for dengue fever viral RNA based on CRISPR/Cpf1 reaction. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 326, 128677 (2021).

     Article  Google Scholar 

148. LeMieux, J. CRISPR comes of age—as a diagnostic: hailed for its gene editing power, Sherlock Bioscience’s COVID-19 diagnostic is the first CRISPR technology to gain FDA approval. Clinical OMICs 7, 10–12 (2020).

     Article  Google Scholar 

149. Guglielmi, G. First CRISPR test for the coronavirus approved in the United States. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01402-9 (2020).

150. Myhrvold, C. et al. Field-deployable viral diagnostics using CRISPR-Cas13. Science 360, 444–448 (2018).

     Article  Google Scholar 

151. Saiki, R. K. et al. Enzymatic amplification of β-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science 230, 1350–1354 (1985).

     Article  Google Scholar 

152. Wang, D.-G., Brewster, J. D., Paul, M. & Tomasula, P. M. Two methods for increased specificity and sensitivity in loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Molecules 20, 6048–6059 (2015).

     Article  Google Scholar 

153. Piepenburg, O., Williams, C. H., Stemple, D. L. & Armes, N. A. DNA detection using recombination proteins. PLoS Biol. 4, e204 (2006).

     Article  Google Scholar 

154. Godeux, A.-S. et al. Interbacterial transfer of carbapenem resistance and large antibiotic resistance islands by natural transformation in pathogenic Acinetobacter. mBio 13, e02631-21 (2022).

     Article  Google Scholar 

155. Nielsen, K. M., Smalla, K. & van Elsas, J. D. Natural transformation of Acinetobacter sp. strain BD413 with cell lysates of Acinetobacter sp., Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Burkholderia cepacia in soil microcosms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 206–212 (2000).

     Article  Google Scholar 

156. Zhang, X. et al. Stress-induced, highly efficient, donor cell-dependent cell-to-cell natural transformation in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 200, e002670-18 (2018).

     Article  Google Scholar 

157. Cowley, L. A. et al. Evolution via recombination: cell-to-cell contact facilitates larger recombination events in Streptococcus pneumoniae. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007410 (2018).

     Article  Google Scholar 

158. Siguenza, N. et al. Engineered bacterial therapeutics for detecting and treating CRC. Trends Cancer 10, 588–597 (2024).

     Article  Google Scholar 

159. Redenti, A. et al. Probiotic neoantigen delivery vectors for precision cancer immunotherapy. Nature 635, 453–461 (2024).

     Article  Google Scholar 

160. Guo, F. et al. Live attenuated bacterium limits cancer resistance to CAR-T therapy by remodeling the tumor microenvironment. J. Immunother. Cancer 10, e003760 (2022).

     Article  Google Scholar 

161. Abedi, M. H. et al. Ultrasound-controllable engineered bacteria for cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Commun. 13, 1585 (2022).

     Article  Google Scholar 

162. Hurt, R. C. et al. Genomically mined acoustic reporter genes for real-time in vivo monitoring of tumors and tumor-homing bacteria. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 919–931 (2023).

     Article  Google Scholar 

163. Ma, Y., Manna, A. & Moon, T. S. Advances in engineering genetic circuits for microbial biocontainment. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 36, 100483 (2023).

     Article  Google Scholar 

164. Low, K. B. et al. Lipid A mutant Salmonella with suppressed virulence and TNFα induction retain tumor-targeting in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 37–41 (1999).

     Article  Google Scholar 

165. Clairmont, C. et al. Biodistribution and genetic stability of the novel antitumor agent VNP20009, a genetically modified strain of Salmonella typhimuvium. J. Infect. Dis. 181, 1996–2002 (2000).

     Article  Google Scholar 

166. Pawelek, J. M., Low, K. B. & Bermudes, D. Bacteria as tumour-targeting vectors. Lancet Oncol. 4, 548–556 (2003).

     Article  Google Scholar 

167. Ecological fitness, genomic islands and bacterial pathogenicity. EMBO Rep. 2, 376–381 (2001)

168. Hacker, J., Hentschel, U. & Dobrindt, U. Prokaryotic chromosomes and disease. Science 301, 790–793 (2003).

     Article  Google Scholar 

169. Hoffman, R. M. Tumor-seeking Salmonella amino acid auxotrophs. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 22, 917–923 (2011).

     Article  Google Scholar 

170. Chan, C. T., Lee, J. W., Cameron, D. E., Bashor, C. J. & Collins, J. J. ‘Deadman’ and ‘Passcode’ microbial kill switches for bacterial containment. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 82–86 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

171. Cui, L. & Bikard, D. Consequences of Cas9 cleavage in the chromosome of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 4243–4251 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

172. Richter, F. et al. Engineering of temperature- and light-switchable Cas9 variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 10003–10014 (2013).

     Article  Google Scholar 

173. Foo, G. W. et al. Intein-based thermoregulated meganucleases for containment of genetic material. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, 2066–2077 (2024).

     Article  Google Scholar 

174. Rovner, A. J. et al. Recoded organisms engineered to depend on synthetic amino acids. Nature 518, 89–93 (2015).

     Article  Google Scholar 

175. Ma, N. J. & Isaacs, F. J. Genomic recoding broadly obstructs the propagation of horizontally transferred genetic elements. Cell Syst. 3, 199–207 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

176. Zürcher, J. F. et al. Refactored genetic codes enable bidirectional genetic isolation. Science 378, 516–523 (2022).

     Article  Google Scholar 

177. Nia, L. H. & Claesen, J. Engineered cancer targeting microbes and encapsulation devices for human gut microbiome applications. Biochemistry 61, 2841–2848 (2022).

     Article  Google Scholar 

178. Yamanaka, Y., Watanabe, H., Yamauchi, E., Miyake, Y. & Yamamoto, K. Measurement of the promoter activity in Escherichia coli by using a luciferase reporter. Bio-protocol 10, e3500 (2020).

     Article  Google Scholar 

179. Nordgård, L. et al. Lack of detectable DNA uptake by bacterial gut isolates grown in vitro and by Acinetobacter baylyi colonizing rodents in vivo. Environ. Biosafety Res. 6, 149–160 (2007).

     Article  Google Scholar 

180. Paz, E. D. la et al. A self-powered ingestible wireless biosensing system for real-time in situ monitoring of gastrointestinal tract metabolites. Nat. Commun. 13, 7405 (2022).

     Article  Google Scholar 

181. Recorbet, G., Picard, C., Normand, P. & Simonet, P. Kinetics of the persistence of chromosomal DNA from genetically engineered Escherichia coli introduced into soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59, 4289–4294 (1993).

     Article  Google Scholar 

182. Alarcon, C. M. et al. Application of DNA- and protein-based detection methods in agricultural biotechnology. J. Agric. Food Chem. 67, 1019–1028 (2019).

     Article  Google Scholar 

183. Martzy, R. et al. Challenges and perspectives in the application of isothermal DNA amplification methods for food and water analysis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 411, 1695–1702 (2019).

     Article  Google Scholar 

184. Pawlowski, J., Bonin, A., Boyer, F., Cordier, T. & Taberlet, P. Environmental DNA for biomonitoring. Mol. Ecol. 30, 2931–2936 (2021).

     Article  Google Scholar 

185. Gettings, K. B., Tillmar, A., Sturk-Andreaggi, K. & Marshall, C. Review of SNP assays for disaster victim identification: cost, time, and performance information for decision-makers. J. Forensic Sci. 69, 1546–1557 (2024).

     Article  Google Scholar 

186. Vasala, A., Hytönen, V. P. & Laitinen, O. H. Modern Tools for rapid diagnostics of antimicrobial resistance. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 10, 308 (2020).

     Article  Google Scholar 

187. Belkum, A. van et al. Developmental roadmap for antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 51–62 (2019).

     Article  Google Scholar 

188. Misra, S. K. in Next Generation Biomanufacturing Technologies (eds Rathinam, N. K. & Sani, R. K.) 141–154 (ACS Publications, 2019).

189. Süntar, I., Çetinkaya, S., Haydarŏglu, Ü. S. & Habtemariam, S. Bioproduction process of natural products and biopharmaceuticals: biotechnological aspects. Biotechnol. Adv. 50, 107768 (2021).

     Article  Google Scholar 

190. Tang, Q. et al. Current sampling methods for gut microbiota: a call for more precise devices. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 10, 151 (2020).

     Article  Google Scholar 

191. Levitan, O. et al. The gut microbiome–does stool represent right? Heliyon 9, e13602 (2023).

     Article  Google Scholar 

192. Opgenorth, P. et al. Lessons from two design-build-test-learn cycles of dodecanol production in Escherichia coli aided by machine learning. ACS Synth. Biol. 8, 1337–1351 (2019).

     Article  Google Scholar 

193. Carbonell, P. et al. An automated Design-Build-Test-Learn pipeline for enhanced microbial production of fine chemicals. Commun. Biol. 1, 66 (2018).

     Article  Google Scholar 

194. Miskovic, L. et al. A design–build–test cycle using modeling and experiments reveals interdependencies between upper glycolysis and xylose uptake in recombinant S. cerevisiae and improves predictive capabilities of large-scale kinetic models. Biotechnol. Biofuels 10, 166 (2017).

     Article  Google Scholar 

Download references