Collias, D. & Beisel, C. L. CRISPR technologies and the search for the PAM-free nuclease. Nat. Commun. 12, 555 (2021).
Karvelis, T. et al. Rapid characterization of CRISPR–Cas9 protospacer adjacent motif sequence elements. Genome Biol. 16, 253 (2015).
Gasiunas, G. et al. A catalogue of biochemically diverse CRISPR–Cas9 orthologs. Nat. Commun. 11, 5512 (2020).
Yan, W. X. et al. Functionally diverse type V CRISPR–Cas systems. Science 363, 88–91 (2019).
Anzalone, A. V., Koblan, L. W. & Liu, D. R. Genome editing with CRISPR–Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 824–844 (2020).
Christie, K. A. et al. Towards personalised allele-specific CRISPR gene editing to treat autosomal dominant disorders. Sci. Rep. 7, 16174 (2017).
Nishimasu, H. et al. Engineered CRISPR–Cas9 nuclease with expanded targeting space. Science 361, 1259–1262 (2018).
Walton, R. T., Christie, K. A., Whittaker, M. N. & Kleinstiver, B. P. Unconstrained genome targeting with near-PAMless engineered CRISPR–Cas9 variants. Science 368, 290–296 (2020).
Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Engineered CRISPR–Cas12a variants with increased activities and improved targeting ranges for gene, epigenetic and base editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 276–282 (2019).
Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Broadening the targeting range of Staphylococcus aureus CRISPR–Cas9 by modifying PAM recognition. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1293–1298 (2015).
Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Engineered CRISPR–Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature 523, 481–485 (2015).
Hu, J. H. et al. Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity. Nature 556, 57–63 (2018).
Huang, T. P. et al. High-throughput continuous evolution of compact Cas9 variants targeting single-nucleotide-pyrimidine PAMs. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 96–107 (2023).
Miller, S. M. et al. Continuous evolution of SpCas9 variants compatible with non-G PAMs. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 471–481 (2020).
Nijkamp, E., Ruffolo, J. A., Weinstein, E. N., Naik, N. & Madani, A. ProGen2: exploring the boundaries of protein language models. Cell Syst. 14, 968–978 (2023).
Lin, Z. et al. Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model. Science 379, 1123–1130 (2023).
Ruffolo, J. A. et al. Design of highly functional genome editors by modelling CRISPR–Cas sequences. Nature 645, 518–525 (2025).
Meeske, A. J. & Marraffini, L. A. RNA guide complementarity prevents self-targeting in type VI CRISPR Systems. Mol. Cell 71, 791–801 (2018).
Marraffini, L. A. & Sontheimer, E. J. CRISPR interference: RNA-directed adaptive immunity in bacteria and archaea. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 181–190 (2010).
Camargo, A. P. et al. IMG/VR v4: an expanded database of uncultivated virus genomes within a framework of extensive functional, taxonomic, and ecological metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D733–D743 (2023).
Camargo, A. P. et al. IMG/PR: a database of plasmids from genomes and metagenomes with rich annotations and metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D164–D173 (2024).
Ciciani, M. et al. Automated identification of sequence-tailored Cas9 proteins using massive metagenomic data. Nat. Commun. 13, 6474 (2022).
Adler, B. A. et al. CasPEDIA Database: a functional classification system for class 2 CRISPR–Cas enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D590–D596 (2024).
Gleditzsch, D. et al. PAM identification by CRISPR–Cas effector complexes: diversified mechanisms and structures. RNA Biol. 16, 504–517 (2019).
Anders, C., Niewoehner, O., Duerst, A. & Jinek, M. Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nature 513, 569–573 (2014).
Ruffolo, J. A. et al. Adapting protein language models for structure-conditioned design. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.03.606485 (2024).
Wei, J. et al. Closely related type II-C Cas9 orthologs recognize diverse PAMs. eLife 11, e77825 (2022).
Wimmer, F., Mougiakos, I., Englert, F. & Beisel, C. L. Rapid cell-free characterization of multi-subunit CRISPR effectors and transposons. Mol. Cell 82, 1210–1224 (2022).
Sun, W. et al. Structures of Neisseria meningitidis Cas9 complexes in catalytically poised and anti-CRISPR-inhibited states. Mol. Cell 76, 938–952 (2019).
Huang, X. et al. Decoding CRISPR-Cas PAM recognition with UniDesign. Brief. Bioinform. 24, bbad133 (2023).
Hirano, S., Nishimasu, H., Ishitani, R. & Nureki, O. Structural basis for the altered PAM specificities of engineered CRISPR–Cas9. Mol. Cell 61, 886–894 (2016).
Anders, C., Bargsten, K. & Jinek, M. Structural plasticity of PAM recognition by engineered variants of the RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Mol. Cell 61, 895–902 (2016).
Schmidheini, L. et al. Continuous directed evolution of a compact CjCas9 variant with broad PAM compatibility. Nat. Chem. Biol. 20, 333–343 (2024).
Amrani, N. et al. NmeCas9 is an intrinsically high-fidelity genome-editing platform. Genome Biol. 19, 1–25 (2018).
Tsui, T. K. M., Hand, T. H., Duboy, E. C. & Li, H. The impact of DNA topology and guide length on target selection by a cytosine-specific Cas9. ACS Synth. Biol. 6, 1103–1113 (2017).
Luscombe, N. M., Laskowski, R. A. & Thornton, J. M. Amino acid-base interactions: a three-dimensional analysis of protein–DNA interactions at an atomic level. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 2860–2874 (2001).
Walton, R. T., Hsu, J. Y., Joung, J. K. & Kleinstiver, B. P. Scalable characterization of the PAM requirements of CRISPR–Cas enzymes using HT-PAMDA. Nat. Protoc. 16, 1511–1547 (2021).
Grathwohl, W., Swersky, K., Hashemi, M., Duvenaud, D. & Maddison, C. Oops I took a gradient: scalable sampling for discrete distributions. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning (eds Meila, M. & Zhang, T.) (PMLR, 2021).
Li, W. & Godzik, A. CD-HIT: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22, 1658–1659 (2006).
Buchfink, B., Xie, C. & Huson, D. H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 12, 59–60 (2015).
van Dongen, S. Graph clustering via a discrete uncoupling process. SIAM J. Matrix. Anal. Appl. 30, 121–141 (2008).
Deorowicz, S., Debudaj-Grabysz, A. & Gudyś, A. FAMSA: fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment of huge protein families. Sci. Rep. 6, 33964 (2016).
Eddy, S. R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002195 (2011).
Steinegger, M. & Söding, J. MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 1026–1028 (2017).
Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2—approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490 (2010).
Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W293–W296 (2021).
Liu, Z. et al. Versatile and efficient genome editing with Neisseria cinerea Cas9. Commun. Biol. 5, 1–7 (2022).
Hand, T. H., Das, A. & Li, H. Directed evolution studies of a thermophilic type II-C Cas9. Methods Enzymol. 616, 265–288 (2019).
Hirano, H. et al. Structure and engineering of Francisella novicida Cas9. Cell 164, 950–961 (2016).
Cui, Z. et al. FrCas9 is a CRISPR/Cas9 system with high editing efficiency and fidelity. Nat. Commun. 13, 1425 (2022).
Kim, E. et al. In vivo genome editing with a small Cas9 orthologue derived from Campylobacter jejuni. Nat. Commun. 8, 14500 (2017).
Hirano, S. et al. Structural basis for the promiscuous PAM recognition by Corynebacterium diphtheriae Cas9. Nat. Commun. 10, 1968 (2019).
Zetsche, B. et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR–Cas system. Cell 163, 759–771 (2015).
Zetsche, B., Abudayyeh, O. O., Gootenberg, J. S., Scott, D. A. & Zhang, F. A survey of genome editing activity for 16 Cas12a orthologs. Keio J. Med. 69, 59–65 (2020).
Strecker, J. et al. Engineering of CRISPR–Cas12b for human genome editing. Nat. Commun. 10, 212 (2019).
Harrington, L. B. et al. A scoutRNA is required for some type V CRISPR–Cas systems. Mol. Cell 79, 416–424 (2020).
Burstein, D. et al. New CRISPR–Cas systems from uncultivated microbes. Nature 542, 237–241 (2017).
Karvelis, T. et al. PAM recognition by miniature CRISPR–Cas12f nucleases triggers programmable double-stranded DNA target cleavage. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 5016 (2020).
Wang, Y. et al. A highly specific CRISPR-Cas12j nuclease enables allele-specific genome editing. Sci. Adv. 9, eabo6405 (2023).
Strecker, J. et al. RNA-guided DNA insertion with CRISPR-associated transposases. Science 365, 48–53 (2019).
Urbaitis, T. et al. A new family of CRISPR-type V nucleases with C-rich PAM recognition. EMBO Rep. 23, e55481 (2022).
Wu, W. Y. et al. The miniature CRISPR–Cas12m effector binds DNA to block transcription. Mol. Cell 82, 4487–4502 (2022).
Al-Shayeb, B. et al. Diverse virus-encoded CRISPR–Cas systems include streamlined genome editors. Cell 185, 4574–4586 (2022).
Zhang, Y. et al. Catalytic-state structure and engineering of Streptococcus thermophilus Cas9. Nat. Catal. 3, 813–823 (2020).
Tran, M. H. et al. A more efficient CRISPR–Cas12a variant derived from MA2020. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 24, 40–53 (2021).
Gao, L. et al. Engineered Cpf1 variants with altered PAM specificities. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 789–792 (2017).
Russel, J., Pinilla-Redondo, R., Mayo-Mun˜oz, D., Shah, S. A. & Sørensen, S. J. CRISPRCasTyper: automated identification, annotation, and classification of CRISPR–Cas loci. CRISPR J. 3, 462–469 (2020).
Chen, Z. & Zhao, H. A highly sensitive selection method for directed evolution of homing endonucleases. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, e154 (2005).
Rohland, N. & Reich, D. Cost-effective, high-throughput DNA sequencing libraries for multiplexed target capture. Genome Res. 22, 939–946 (2012).
Gooden, A. A., Evans, C. N., Sheets, T. P., Clapp, M. E. & Chari, R. dbGuide: a database of functionally validated guide RNAs for genome editing in human and mouse cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D871–D876 (2020).
Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890 (2018).
Clement, K. et al. CRISPResso2 provides accurate and rapid genome editing sequence analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 224–226 (2019).