Integrative transcriptome and genome resequencing reveals conserved flowering regulators and allelic variants in early- and late-flowering linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) accessions

1. Cockram, J. et al. Control of flowering time in temperate cereals: genes, domestication, and sustainable productivity. J. Exp. Bot. 58 (6), 1231–1244 (2007).

   Google Scholar 

2. Roux, F., Touzet, P., Cuguen, J. & Le-Corre, V. How to be early flowering: an evolutionary perspective. Trends Plant. Sci. 11 (8), 375–381 (2006).

   Google Scholar 

3. Yadav, B. et al. Integrated omics approaches for flax improvement under abiotic and biotic stress: current status and future prospects. Front. Plant. Sci. 13, 931275. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.931275 (2022).

   Google Scholar 

4. Kaur, V. et al. Diversity of Linum genetic resources in global genebanks: from agro-morphological characterisation to novel genomic technologies – a review. Front. Nutr. 10, 1165580. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1165580 (2023).

   Google Scholar 

5. Mouradov, A., Cremer, F. & Coupland, G. Control of flowering time: interacting pathways as a basis for diversity. Plant. Cell. 2002, S111–S130. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.001362 (2002).

6. Domantovich, A. V., Koshkin, V. A., Brutch, N. B. & Matvienko, I. I. Investigation of photoperiod sensitivity of Linum usitatissimum L. lines and effect of short-day conditions on their economically valuable traits. Russ Agric. Sci. 38, 173–177. https://doi.org/10.3103/s1068367412030056 (2012).

   Google Scholar 

7. Miller, P. R., McDonald, C. L., Derksen, D. A. & Waddington, J. The adaptation of seven broadleaf crops to the dry semiarid prairie. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 81, 29–43. https://doi.org/10.4141/p00-028 (2001).

   Google Scholar 

8. Hall, L. M., Booker, H., Siloto, M. P. R., Jhala, A. J. & Weselake, R. J. Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Ind. Oil Crops 2016, 157–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-893997-98-1.00006-3 (2016).

9. Sun, J., Young, L. W., House, M. A., Daba, K. & Booker, H. M. Photoperiod sensitivity of Canadian flax cultivars and 5-azacytidine treated early flowering derivative lines. BMC Plant. Biol. 19, 177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1763-5 (2019).

   Google Scholar 

10. Singh, T. & Satapathy, B. S. Intensification of pulses and oilseeds intensification of pulses and oilseeds in rice fallows. Indian Farm. 69 (10), 31–34 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

11. House, M. A., Young, L. W., Robinson, S. J. & Booker, H. M. Transcriptomic analysis of early flowering signals in ‘Royal’ flax. Plants 11, 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070860 (2022).

12. Craufurd, P. Q. & Wheeler, T. R. Climate change and the flowering time of annual crops. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 2529–2539 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

13. Soto-Cerda, B. J., Aravena, G. & Cloutier, S. Genetic dissection of flowering time in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) through single- and multi-locus genome-wide association studies. Mol. Genet. Genomics. 296 (4), 877–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-021-01785-y (2021).

    Google Scholar 

14. Andrés, F. & Coupland, G. The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13 (9), 627–639 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

15. Jack, T. Molecular and genetic mechanisms of floral control. Plant. Cell. 16 (suppl_1), S1–S17 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

16. Krizek, B. A. & Fletcher, J. C. Molecular mechanisms of flower development: an armchair guide. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6 (9), 688–698 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

17. Fornara, F., de Montaigu, A. & Coupland, G. SnapShot: control of flowering in Arabidopsis. Cell 141 (3), 550–550 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

18. Zhang, D. P. Abscisic Acid, Metabolism, Transport and Signaling 1st edn (Springer, 2014).

19. Chowdhury, Z. et al. Dehydroabietinal promotes flowering time and plant defense in Arabidopsis via the autonomous pathway genes FLOWERING LOCUS D, FVE, and RELATIVE OF EARLY FLOWERING 6. J. Exp. Bot. 71 (16), 4903–4913 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

20. Lee, H. et al. The AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 MADS domain protein integrates floral inductive pathways in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 14 (18), 2366–2376 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

21. Turck, F., Fornara, F. & Coupland, G. Regulation and identity of florigen: FLOWERING LOCUS T moves center stage. Annu. Rev. Plant. Biol. 59, 573–594. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092755 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

22. Bernier, G., Havelange, A., Houssa, C., Petitjean, A. & Lejeune, P. Physiological signals that induce flowering. Plant. Cell. 5 (10), 1147 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

23. Corbesier, L., Lejeune, P. & Bernier, G. The role of carbohydrates in the induction of flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana: comparison between the wild type and a starchless mutant. Planta 206, 131–137 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

24. Tognetti, J. A., Pontis, H. G. & Martínez-Noël, G. M. Sucrose signaling in plants: a world yet to be explored. Plant Signal. Behav. 8(3), e23316 (2013).

25. Muradoglu, F., Balta, F. & Battal, P. Endogenous hormone levels in bearing and non-bearing shoots of walnut (Juglans regia L.) and their mutual relationships. Acta Physiol. Plant. 32, 53–57 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

26. Potchanasin, P., Sringarm, K., Sruamsiri, P. & Bangerth, K. F. Floral induction (FI) in longan (Dimocarpus longan, Lour.) trees: part I. Low temperature and potassium chlorate effects on FI and hormonal changes exerted in terminal buds and sub-apical tissue. Sci. Hort. 122 (2), 288–294 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

27. Clarke, A. E., Dennis, E. & Mol, J. Forefronts of flowering. Plant. Cell. 4 (8), 867 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

28. Lavee, S. Biology and Physiology of Olive. World Olive Encyclopedia (International Olive Council, 1998).

29. Okada, K., Ueda, J., Komaki, M. K., Bell, C. J. & Shimura, Y. Requirement of the auxin polar transport system in early stages of Arabidopsis floral bud formation. Plant. Cell. 3 (7), 677–684 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

30. He, J., Xin, P., Ma, X., Chu, J. & Wang, G. Gibberellin metabolism in flowering plants: an update and perspectives. Front. Plant. Sci. 11, 532. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00532 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

31. Sirohi, J. S. & Wasnik, K. G. Photosensitivity at varietal level in linseed. Indian J. Plant. Physiol. 21, 127–132 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

32. Saroha, A. et al. Agro-morphological variability and genetic diversity in linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) germplasm accessions with emphasis on flowering and maturity time. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 69, 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-021-01231-3 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

33. Soto-Cerda, B. J. et al. Genomic regions underlying agronomic traits in linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) as revealed by association mapping. J. Integr. Plant. Biol. 56, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12118 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

34. Singh, N., Agarwal, N. & Yadav, H. K. Genome-wide SNP-based diversity analysis and association mapping in linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.). Euphytica 215, 139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-019-2462-x (2019).

    Google Scholar 

35. You, F. M. & Cloutier, S. Mapping quantitative trait loci onto chromosome-scale pseudomolecules in flax. MPs 3, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps3020028 (2020).

36. Saroha, A. et al. Identification of QTNs associated with flowering time, maturity, and plant height traits in Linum usitatissimum L. using genome-wide association study. Front. Genet. 13, 811924. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.811924 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

37. Schewe, L. C., Sawhney, V. K. & Davis, A. R. Ontogeny of floral organs in flax (Linum usitatissimum; Linaceae). Am. J. Bot. 98 (7), 1077–1085. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000431 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

38. Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30 (15), 2114–2120 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

39. Kim, D., Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods. 12 (4), 357–360 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

40. Pertea, M., Kim, D., Pertea, G. M., Leek, J. T. & Salzberg, S. L. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat. Protoc. 11 (9), 1650–1667 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

41. Pertea, M. et al. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 33 (3), 290–295 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

42. Patro, R., Duggal, G., Love, M. I., Irizarry, R. A. & Kingsford, C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods. 14 (4), 417–419 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

43. Soneson, C., Love, M. I. & Robinson, M. D. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. F1000Research 2015, 4. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7563.1 (2015).

44. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 1–21 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

45. Conesa, A. et al. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21 (18), 3674–3676 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

46. Yu, G., Wang, L. G., Han, Y. & He, Q. Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. Omics: J. Integr. biology. 16 (5), 284–287 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

47. Wu, T. et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. The innovation, 2, 3 (2021).

48. Schwacke, R. et al. MapMan4: a refined protein classification and annotation framework applicable to multi-omics data analysis. Mol. Plant. 12 (6), 879–892 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

49. Thimm, O. et al. MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J. 37 (6), 914–939 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

50. Andrews, S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data (2010). http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc.

51. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods. 9 (4), 357–359 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

52. Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 10 (2), giab008 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

53. You, F. M. et al. Chromosome-scale pseudomolecules refined by optical, physical and genetic maps in flax. Plant. J. 95, 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13944 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

54. Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30 (4), 772–780 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

55. Waterhouse, A. et al. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 46 (W1), W296–W303 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

56. Ko, J., Park, H., Heo, L. & Seok, C. GalaxyWEB server for protein structure prediction and refinement. Nucleic Acids Res. 40 (W1), W294–W297 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

57. Abraham, M. J. et al. GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1, 19–25 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

58. Kaur, V. et al. Multi-environment phenotyping of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) germplasm for morphological and seed quality traits to assemble a core collection. Ind. Crops Prod. 206, 117657 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

59. Kaur, V. et al. Leveraging genetic resource diversity and identification of trait-enriched superior genotypes for accelerated improvement in linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.). Sci. Rep. 14 (1), 20266 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

60. Zhang, J. et al. Consensus genetic linkage map construction and QTL mapping for plant height-related traits in linseed flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). BMC Plant. Biol. 18, 160. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1366-6 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

61. Lauri, P. É. & Normand, F. Are leaves only involved in flowering? Bridging the gap between structural botany and functional morphology. Tree Physiol. 37 (9), 1137–1139 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

62. Yoo, S. C. et al. Phloem long-distance delivery of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) to the apex. Plant J. 75 (3), 456–468 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

63. Chen, Q. et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the R2R3-MYB transcription factor family revealed their potential roles in the flowering process in Longan (Dimocarpus longan). Front. Plant. Sci. 13, 820439. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.820439 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

64. Fouché, J. G. & Coumans, M. P. Relationship between peroxidase activity and flower localization along Vanilla planifolia vines. Biol. Plant. 37, 515–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908830 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

65. Minerdi, D., Savoi, S. & Sabbatini, P. Role of cytochrome P450 enzyme in plant microorganisms’ communication: a focus on grapevine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24 (5), 4695 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

66. Subbaraya, U., Rajendran, S., Simeon, S., Suthanthiram, B. & Somasundram, S. M. Unravelling the regulatory network of transcription factors in parthenocarpy. Sci. Hort. 261, 108920 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

67. Guilfoyle, T. J. & Hagen, G. Auxin response factors. Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol. 10 (5), 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2007.08.014 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

68. Iñigo, S., Giraldez, A. N., Chory, J. & Cerdán, P. D. Proteasome-mediated turnover of Arabidopsis MED25 is coupled to the activation of FLOWERING LOCUS T transcription. Plant Physiol. 160 (3), 1662–1673. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.205500 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

69. Su, Y. et al. Phosphorylation of histone H2A at serine 95: a plant-specific mark involved in flowering time regulation and H2A. Z deposition. Plant. Cell. 29 (9), 2197–2213. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.17.00266 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

70. Li, Q. et al. Highly conserved evolution of aquaporin PIPs and TIPs confers their crucial contribution to flowering process in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 761713doi. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.761713 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

71. Li, W., Wang, H. & Yu, D. Arabidopsis WRKY transcription factors WRKY12 and WRKY13 oppositely regulate flowering under short-day conditions. Mol. Plant. 9 (11), 1492–1503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2016.08.003 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

72. Long, X. et al. The histone variant H3. 3 is required for plant growth and fertility in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25 (5), 2549. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25052549 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

73. Xingzhun, Z. H. U. & Wang, H. Revisiting the role and mechanism of ELF3 in circadian clock modulation. Gene 2024, 148378 (2024).

74. Hodaei, A. & Werbrouck, S. P. Unlocking nature’s clock: CRISPR technology in flowering time engineering. Plants 12 (23), 4020. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12234020 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

75. Wang, X., Wang, Q., Nguyen, P. & Lin, C. Cryptochrome-mediated light responses in plants. In The Enzymes, vol. 35 167–189 (Academic Press, 2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801922-1.00007-5.

76. Blázquez, M. A., Ahn, J. H. & Weigel, D. A thermosensory pathway controlling flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Genet. 33 (2), 168–171 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

77. Park, M. J., Kwon, Y. J., Gil, K. E. & Park, C. M. LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL regulates photoperiodic flowering via the circadian clock in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 16, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0810-8 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

78. Serrano-Bueno, G., Sánchez de Medina Hernández, V. & Valverde, F. Photoperiodic signaling and senescence, an ancient solution to a modern problem? Front. Plant. Sci. 12, 634393. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.634393 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

79. Martignago, D., Siemiatkowska, B., Lombardi, A. & Conti, L. Abscisic acid and flowering regulation: many targets, different placec. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 9700. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249700 (2020).

80. Wang, H. et al. The DELLA-CONSTANS transcription factor cascade integrates gibberellic acid and photoperiod signaling to regulate flowering. Plant. Physiol. 172, 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.16.00891 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

81. Lai, A. G. et al. CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1 regulates ROS homeostasis and oxidative stress responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109 (42), 17129–17134 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

82. García-Quirós, E., Alché, J. D. D., Karpinska, B. & Foyer, C. H. Glutathione redox state plays a key role in flower development and pollen vigour. J. Exp. Bot. 71 (2), 730–741 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

83. Teng, Y., Liang, Y., Wang, M., Mai, H. & Ke, L. Nitrate Transporter 1.1 is involved in regulating flowering time via transcriptional regulation of FLOWERING LOCUS C in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci. 284, 30–36 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

84. Andrés, F. et al. The sugar transporter SWEET10 acts downstream of FLOWERING LOCUS T during floral transition of Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 20, 1–14 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

85. Manna, M., Rengasamy, B. & Sinha, A. K. Revisiting the role of MAPK signalling pathway in plants and its manipulation for crop improvement. Plant. Cell. Environ. 46 (8), 2277–2295 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

86. Zhang, B., Feng, M., Zhang, J. & Song, Z. Involvement of CONSTANS-like proteins in plant flowering and abiotic stress response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24 (23), 16585. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242316585 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

87. Chen, X. et al. SQUAMOSA promoter-binding protein-like transcription factors: star players for plant growth and development. J. Integr. Plant. Biol. 52 (11), 946–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00987.x (2010).

    Google Scholar 

88. Hugouvieux, V. et al. SEPALLATA-driven MADS transcription factor tetramerization is required for inner whorl floral organ development. Plant. Cell. 36 (9), 3435–3450. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koae151 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

89. Bernal-Gallardo, J. J., González-Aguilera, K. L. & de Folter, S. EXPANSIN15 is involved in flower and fruit development in Arabidopsis. Plant. Reprod. 37 (2), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00497-023-00493-4 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

90. Li, G. et al. Coordinated transcriptional regulation underlying the circadian clock in Arabidopsis. Nat. Cell. Biol. 13 (5), 616–622. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2219 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

91. Martín, M. L. et al. A mitochondrial alkaline/neutral invertase isoform (A/N-InvC) functions in developmental energy-demanding processes in Arabidopsis. Planta 237, 813–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-012-1794-8 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

92. Wu, J. et al. Comprehensive effects of flowering locus T-mediated stem growth in tobacco. Front. Plant. Sci. 13, 922919. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.922919 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

93. Wigge, P. A. FT, a mobile developmental signal in plants. Curr. Biol. 21 (9), R373–R379 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

94. Mathieu, J., Yant, L. J., Mürdter, F., Küttner, F. & Schmid, M. Repression of Flowering by the miR172 Target SMZ. PLoS Biol. 7 (7), e1000148. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000148 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

95. Wigge, P. A. FT, a mobile developmental signal in plants. Curr. Biol. 21 (9), R374–R378 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

96. Bao, S., Hua, C., Shen, L. & Yu, H. New insights into gibberellin signaling in regulating flowering in Arabidopsis. J. Integr. Plant. Biol. 62 (1), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12892 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

97. Li, H. et al. The AP2/ERF transcription factor TOE4b regulates photoperiodic flowering and grain yield per plant in soybean. Plant Biotechnol. J. 21 (8), 1682–1694 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

98. Fornara, F. et al. Arabidopsis DOF transcription factors act redundantly to reduce CONSTANS expression and are essential for a photoperiodic flowering response. Dev. Cell. 17 (1), 75–86 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

99. Xu, J. & Dai, H. Brassica napus cycling dof Factor1 (BnCDF1) is involved in flowering time and freezing tolerance. Plant. Growth Regul. 80, 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-016-0168-9 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

100. Zhang, L. et al. Overexpression of Medicago MtCDFd1_1 causes delayed flowering in Medicago via repression of MtFTa1 but not MtCO-like genes. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 1148 (2019).

     Google Scholar 

101. Xu, F., Rong, X., Huang, X. & Cheng, S. Recent advances of flowering locus T gene in higher plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13 (3), 3773–3781. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13033773 (2012).

     Google Scholar 

102. Ortega, R. et al. Altered expression of an FT cluster underlies a major locus controlling domestication-related changes to chickpea Phenology and growth habit. Front. Plant. Sci. 10, 824. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00824 (2019).

     Google Scholar 

103. Schönrock, N. et al. Polycomb-group proteins repress the floral activator AGL19 in the FLC-independent vernalization pathway. Genes Dev. 20 (12), 1667–1678. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.377206 (2006).

     Google Scholar 

104. Kang, M. J., Jin, H. S., Noh, Y. S. & Noh, B. Repression of flowering under a noninductive photoperiod by the HDA9-AGL19-FT module in arabidopsis. New. Phytol. 206, 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13161 (2015).

     Google Scholar 

105. Dreni, L. & Kater, M. M. MADS reloaded: evolution of the AGAMOUS subfamily genes. New Phytol. 201 (3), 717–732 (2014).

     Google Scholar 

106. Huang, H. et al. iPTMnet: an integrated resource for protein post-translational modification network discovery. Nucleic Acids Res. 46 (D1), D542–D550. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1104 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

107. Li, C., Zhou, A. & Sang, T. Rice domestication by reducing shattering. Science 311, 1936–1939 (2006).

     Google Scholar 

108. Singh, P. & Sinha, A. K. A positive feedback loop governed by SUB1A1 interaction with Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase3 imparts submergence tolerance in rice. Plant. Cell. 28, 1127–1143 (2016).

     Google Scholar 

109. Wankhede, D. P., Aravind, J. & Mishra, S. P. Identification of genic SNPs from ESTs and effect of non-synonymous SNP on proteins in Pigeonpea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B: Biol. Sci. 89, 595–603 (2019).

110. Kumari, S. et al. Genome-wide identification and characterization of Trihelix gene family in Asian and African Vigna species. Agriculture 12 (12), 2172 (2022).

     Google Scholar 

111. Laddach, A., Ng, J. C. F., Chung, S. S. & Fraternali, F. Genetic variants and protein–protein interactions: a multidimensional network-centric view. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 50, 82–90 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

Download references