Metabolic engineering of doxorubicin biosynthesis through P450-redox partner optimization and structural analysis of DoxA

1. Hulst, M. B. et al. Anthracyclines: biosynthesis, engineering and clinical applications. Nat. Prod. Rep. 39, 814–841 (2021).

   Google Scholar 

2. Metsä-Ketelä, M., Niemi, J., Mäntsälä, P. & Schneider, G. Anthracycline biosynthesis: genes, enzymes and mechanisms. Top. Curr. Chem. 282, 101–140 (2008).

   Google Scholar 

3. Weiss, R. B. The anthracyclines: will we ever find a better doxorubicin?. Semin. oncol. 19, 670–686 (1992).

   Google Scholar 

4. van der Zanden, S. Y., Qiao, X. H. & Neefjes, J. New insights into the activities and toxicities of the old anticancer drug doxorubicin. FEBS J. 1, 18 (2020).

   Google Scholar 

5. Pang, B., de Jong, J., Qiao, X., Wessels, L. F. A. & Neefjes, J. Chemical profiling of the genome with anti-cancer drugs defines target specificities. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 472–480 (2015).

   Google Scholar 

6. Arcamone, F. et al. Adriamycin, 14-hydroxydaunomycin, a new antitumor antibiotic from S. peucetius var. caesius. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 11, 1101–1110 (1969).

   Google Scholar 

7. Grimm, A., Madduri, K., Ali, A. & Hutchinson, C. R. Characterization of the Streptomyces peucetius ATCC 29050 genes encoding doxorubicin polyketide synthase. Gene 151, 1–10 (1994).

   Google Scholar 

8. Lomovskaya, N. et al. Doxorubicin overproduction in Streptomyces peucetius: cloning and characterization of the dnrU ketoreductase and dnrV genes and the doxA cytochrome P-450 hydroxylase gene. J. Bacteriol. 181, 305–318 (1999).

   Google Scholar 

9. Dickens, M. L., Priestley, N. D. & Strohl, W. R. In vivo and in vitro bioconversion of ε-rhodomycinone glycoside to doxorubicin: Functions of DauP, DauK, and DoxA. J. Bacteriol. 179, 2641–2650 (1997).

   Google Scholar 

10. Walczak, R. J., Dickens, M. L., Priestley, N. D. & Strohl, W. R. Purification, properties, and characterization of recombinant Streptomyces sp. strain C5 DoxA, a cytochrome P-450 catalyzing multiple steps in doxorubicin biosynthesis. J. Bacteriol. 181, 298–304 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

11. Wei, Y., Ang, E. L. & Zhao, H. Recent developments in the application of P450-based biocatalysts. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 43, 1–7 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

12. Meunier, B., de Visser, S. P. & Shaik, S. Mechanism of oxidation reactions catalyzed by cytochrome P450 enzymes. Chem. Rev. 104, 3947–3980 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

13. Li, S., Du, L. & Bernhardt, R. Redox Partners: Function Modulators of Bacterial P450 Enzymes. Trends Microbiol 28, 445–454 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

14. Rimal, H., Lee, S. W., Lee, J. H. & Oh, T. J. Understanding of real alternative redox partner of Streptomyces peucetius DoxA: Prediction and validation using in silico and in vitro analyses. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 585, 64–74 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

15. Yang, L. et al. Functional expression and purification of DoxA, a key cytochrome P450 from Streptomyces peucetius ATCC 27952. PeerJ 10, e14373 (2022).

16. Dekleva, M. L. & Strohl, W. R. Glucose-stimulated acidogenesis by Streptomyces peucetius. Can. J. Microbiol. 33, 1129–1132 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

17. Tang, L., Grimm, A., Zhang, Y. & Hutchinson, C. R. Purification and characterization of the DNA-binding protein DnrI, a transcriptional factor of daunorubicin biosynthesis in Streptomyces peucetius. Mol. Microbiol. 22, 801–813 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

18. Yuan, T., Yin, C., Zhu, C., Zhu, B. & Hu, Y. Improvement of antibiotic productivity by knock-out of dauW in Streptomyces coeruleobidus. Microbiol. Res. 166, 539–547 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

19. Diana, R.-M. et al. Dissecting the role of the two Streptomyces peucetius var. caesius glucokinases in the sensitivity to carbon catabolite repression. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 48, kuab047 (2021).

20. Bai, Y., Chen, T., Happe, T., Lu, Y. & Sawyer, A. Iron–sulphur cluster biogenesis via the SUF pathway. Metallomics 10, 1038–1052 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

21. Cheng, Y. et al. SufR, a [4Fe-4S] Cluster-containing transcription factor, represses the sufRBDCSU operon in Streptomyces avermitilis iron-sulfur cluster assembly. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 86, e01523 (2020).

22. Cook, A. M. & Denger, K. Metabolism of taurine in microorganisms. in Taurine 6 3–13 (Springer US).

23. Fisher, J., Abdella, B. R. J. & McLane, K. E. Anthracycline antibiotic reduction by spinach ferredoxin-NADP+ reductase and ferredoxin. Biochemistry 24, 3562–3571 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

24. Senda, M. et al. Molecular mechanism of the redox-dependent interaction between NADH-dependent ferredoxin reductase and Rieske-type [2Fe-2S] ferredoxin. J. Mol. Biol. 373, 382–400 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

25. Friemann, R. et al. Structures of the multicomponent Rieske non-heme iron toluene 2,3-dioxygenase enzyme system. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 65, 24–33 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

26. Binda, C., Coda, A., Aliverti, A., Zanetti, G. & Mattevi, A. Structure of the mutant E92K of [2Fe-2S] ferredoxin I from Spinacia oleracea at 1.7 A resolution. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 54, 1353–1358 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

27. Pochapsky, T. C., Jain, N. U., Kuti, M., Lyons, T. A. & Heymont, J. A refined model for the solution structure of oxidized putidaredoxin. Biochemistry 38, 4681–4690 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

28. Couture, M. M. J. et al. Characterization of BphF, a Rieske-type ferredoxin with a low reduction potential. Biochemistry 40, 84–92 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

29. Aoki, M., Ishimori, K. & Morishima, I. Roles of negatively charged surface residues of putidaredoxin in interactions with redox partners in P450cam monooxygenase system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta – Protein Struct. Mol. Enzymol. 1386, 157–167 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

30. Aliverti, A., Pandini, V., Pennati, A., de Rosa, M. & Zanetti, G. Structural and functional diversity of ferredoxin-NADP+ reductases. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 474, 283–291 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

31. He, P. & Moran, G. R. Structural and mechanistic comparisons of the metal-binding members of the vicinal oxygen chelate (VOC) superfamily. J. Inorg. Biochem. 105, 1259–1272 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

32. Danshiitsoodol, N., de Pinho, C. A., Matoba, Y., Kumagai, T. & Sugiyama, M. The Mitomycin C (MMC)-binding Protein from MMC-producing Microorganisms Protects from the Lethal Effect of Bleomycin: Crystallographic Analysis to Elucidate the Binding Mode of the Antibiotic to the Protein. J. Mol. Biol. 360, 398–408 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

33. Poulos, T. L. Heme Enzyme Structure and Function. Chem. Rev. 114, 3919–3962 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

34. Tripathi, S., Li, H. & Poulos, T. L. Structural Basis for Effector Control and Redox Partner Recognition in Cytochrome P450. Science 340, 1227–1230 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

35. Strushkevich, N. et al. Structural basis for pregnenolone biosynthesis by the mitochondrial monooxygenase system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 10139–10143 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

36. Chen, C. et al. Advanced Understanding of the Electron Transfer Pathway of Cytochrome P450s. ChemBioChem 22, 1317–1328 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

37. Neidle, S. & Taylor, G. Nucleic acid binding drugs. Part IV. The crystal structure of the anti-cancer agent daunomycin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta – Nucleic Acids Protein Synth. 479, 450–459 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

38. Wani, M. C., Taylor, H. L., Wall, M. E., McPhail, A. T. & Onan, K. D. Antitumor agents. XIII. Isolation and absolute configuration of carminomycin I from Streptosporangium species. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97, 5955–5956 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

39. Pettit, G. R. et al. Antineoplastic agents. 43. Structure of carminomycin I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97, 7387–7388 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

40. Bierman, M. et al. Plasmid cloning vectors for the conjugal transfer of DNA from Escherichia coli to Streptomyces spp. Gene 116, 43–49 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

41. Nguyen, J. T., Riebschleger, K. K., Brown, K. V., Gorgijevska, N. M. & Nybo, S. E. A BioBricks toolbox for metabolic engineering of the tetracenomycin pathway. Biotechnol. J. 17, (2022).

42. Wang, W. et al. An Engineered Strong Promoter for Streptomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 4484–4492 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

43. Bai, C. et al. Exploiting a precise design of universal synthetic modular regulatory elements to unlock the microbial natural products in Streptomyces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 12181–12186 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

44. Torkkell, S. et al. The entire nogalamycin biosynthetic gene cluster of Streptomyces nogalater: Characterization of a 20-kb DNA region and generation of hybrid structures. Mol. Genet. Genom. 266, 276–288 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

45. Nikodinovic, J., Barrow, K. D. & Chuck, J.-A. High yield preparation of genomic DNA from Streptomyces. Biotechniques 35, 932–936 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

46. Andrews, S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. Babraham Inst. (2015).

47. Coil, D., Jospin, G. & Darling, A. E. A5-miseq: An updated pipeline to assemble microbial genomes from Illumina MiSeq data. Bioinformatics 31, 587–589 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

48. Assefa, S., Keane, T. M., Otto, T. D., Newbold, C. & Berriman, M. ABACAS: Algorithm-based automatic contiguation of assembled sequences. Bioinformatics 25, 1968–1969 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

49. Dhakal, D. et al. Complete genome sequence of Streptomyces peucetius ATCC 27952, the producer of anticancer anthracyclines and diverse secondary metabolites. J. Biotechnol. 267, 50–54 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

50. Tsai, I., Thomas, O. tto & Matthew, B. erriman Improving draft assemblies by iterative mapping and assembly of short reads to eliminate gaps. Genome Biol. 11, R41 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

51. Brettin, T. et al. RASTtk: A modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci. Rep. 5, (2015).

52. Kallio, M. A. et al. Chipster: user-friendly analysis software for microarray and other high-throughput data. BMC Genom. 12, 507 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

53. Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

54. Langmead, B., Wilks, C., Antonescu, V. & Charles, R. Scaling read aligners to hundreds of threads on general-purpose processors. Bioinformatics 35, 421–432 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

55. Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq-A Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

56. Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

57. Felsenstein, J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 39, 783–791 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

58. Jones, D. T., Taylor, W. R. & Thornton, J. M. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Bioinformatics 8, 275–282 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

59. Tamura, K., Stecher, G. & Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 3022–3027 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

60. Kallio, P., Sultana, A., Niemi, J., Mäntsälä, P. & Schneider, G. Crystal structure of the polyketide cyclase AknH with bound substrate and product analogue: Implications for catalytic mechanism and product stereoselectivity. J. Mol. Biol. 357, 210–220 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

61. Bradford, M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 7, 248–254 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

62. Guengerich, F. P., Martin, M. V., Sohl, C. D. & Cheng, Q. Measurement of cytochrome P450 and NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase. Nat. Protoc. 4, 1245–1251 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

63. Kabsch, W. X. D. S. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 125–132 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

64. McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

65. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

66. Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Struct. Biol. 75, 861–877 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

67. Winter, G. et al. DIALS: Implementation and evaluation of a new integration package. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Struct. Biol. 74, 85–97 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

68. Winn, M. D. et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 235–242 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

69. Evans, P. R. & Murshudov, G. N. How good are my data and what is the resolution?. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 69, 1204–1214 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

70. Murshudov, G. N. et al. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 355–367 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

71. Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian16 Revision C.01., Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2016. (2016).

72. Case, D. A. et al. AmberTools. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 63, 6183–6191 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

73. Shahrokh, K., Orendt, A., Yost, G. S. & Cheatham, T. E. Quantum mechanically derived AMBER-compatible heme parameters for various states of the cytochrome P450 catalytic cycle. J. Comput. Chem. 33, 119–133 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

74. Bayly, C. I., Cieplak, P., Cornell, W. & Kollman, P. A. A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: the RESP model. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 10269–10280 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

75. Besler, B. H., Merz, K. M. & Kollman, P. A. Atomic charges derived from semiempirical methods. J. Comput. Chem. 11, 431–439 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

76. Singh, U. C. & Kollman, P. A. An approach to computing electrostatic charges for molecules. J. Comput. Chem. 5, 129–145 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

77. Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W. & Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926–935 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

78. Wang, J., Wolf, R. M., Caldwell, J. W., Kollman, P. A. & Case, D. A. Development and testing of a general amber force field. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1157–1174 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

79. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

80. Kieser, T., Bibb, M., Buttner, M., Chater, K. & Hopwood, D. Practical Streptomyces Genetics. (The John Innes Foundation, Norwich, 2000).

81. Wang, R. et al. A BioBricks Metabolic Engineering Platform for the Biosynthesis of Anthracyclinones in Streptomyces coelicolor. ACS Synth. Biol. 11, 4193–4209 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

82. Otsuka, J. & Kunisawa, T. Characteristic base sequence patterns of promoter and terminator sites in φX174 and fd phage DNAs. J. Theor. Biol. 97, 415–436 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references