Morpho-biochemical and molecular identification of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus cereus isolates from sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) rhizosphere

Posted on
morpho-biochemical-and-molecular-identification-of-bacillus-licheniformis-and-bacillus-cereus-isolates-from-sorghum-(sorghum-bicolor-l.)-rhizosphere
Morpho-biochemical and molecular identification of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus cereus isolates from sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) rhizosphere

References

  1. Hossain, M. S., Islam, M. N., Rahman, M. M., Mostofa, M. G. & Khan, M. A. R. Sorghum: A prospective crop for climatic vulnerability, food and nutritional security. J. Agric. Food Res. 8, 100300 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rizvi, A., Ahmed, B., Umar, S. & Khan, M. S. Comprehensive insights into sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) defense mechanisms unveiled: Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in combating Burkholderia-induced bacterial leaf stripe disease. Plant Stress 11, 100397 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kulkova, I., Dobrzyński, J., Kowalczyk, P., Bełżecki, G. & Kramkowski, K. Plant growth promotion using *Bacillus cereus*. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24(11), 9759 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mahdi, I., Fahsi, N., Hafidi, M., Allaoui, A. & Biskri, L. Plant growth enhancement using rhizospheric halotolerant phosphate solubilizing bacterium Bacillus licheniformis QA1 and Enterobacter asburiae QF11 isolated from Chenopodium quinoa Willd. Microorganisms 8(6), 948 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ehling-Schulz, M., Lereclus, D. & Koehler, T. M. The *Bacillus cereus* group: *Bacillus* species with pathogenic potential. Microbiol. Spectr. 7(3), 10–1128 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar, C. et al. Sorghum rhizosphere bacteriome studies and generation of multistrain beneficial bacterial consortia. Microbiol. Res. 292, 128036 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dabban, I. A. et al. Isolation techniques used for molecular characterization of beneficial microorganisms: Cultural, biochemical and molecular characterization. Handb. Agric. Biotechnol. 6, 491–545 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Almasian-Tehrani, N. et al. Overview of typing techniques as molecular epidemiology tools for bacterial characterization. Cell. Mol. Biomed. Rep. 1(2), 69–77 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Flörl, L., Meyer, A. & Bokulich, N. A. Exploring sub-species variation in food microbiomes: A roadmap to reveal hidden diversity and functional potential. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00524-25 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Prasad, B., Sharma, D., Kumar, P. & Dubey, R. C. Biocontrol potential of Bacillus spp. for resilient and sustainable agricultural systems. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 128, 102173 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Khan, A. R. et al. Bacillus spp. as bioagents: Uses and application for sustainable agriculture. Biology 11(12), 1763 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Santos-Medellín, C., Edwards, J., Liechty, Z., Nguyen, B. & Sundaresan, V. Drought stress results in a compartment-specific restructuring of the rice root-associated microbiomes. MBio 8, e00764-17 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Etesami, H., Jeong, B. R. & Glick, B. R. Potential use of Bacillus spp. as an effective biostimulant against abiotic stresses in crops—A review. Curr. Res. Biotechnol. 5, 100128 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huang, Z. et al. Isolation and characterization of *Bacillus cereus* bacteriophage DZ1 and its application in foods. Food Chem. 431, 137128 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. She, R. C. & Petti, C. A. Procedures for the storage of microorganisms. Manual Clin. Microbiol. 8, 161–168 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Davis, K. E., Joseph, S. J. & Janssen, P. H. Effects of growth medium, inoculum size, and incubation time on culturability and isolation of soil bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71(2), 826–834 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas, P., Sekhar, A. C., Upreti, R., Mujawar, M. M. & Pasha, S. S. Optimization of single plate-serial dilution spotting (SP-SDS) with sample anchoring as an assured method for bacterial and yeast cfu enumeration and single colony isolation from diverse samples. Biotechnol. Rep. 8, 45–55 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sousa, A. M., Machado, I., Nicolau, A. & Pereira, M. O. Improvements on colony morphology identification towards bacterial profiling. J. Microbiol. Methods 95(3), 327–335 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aslim, B., Sağlam, N. & Beyatli, Y. Determination of some properties of Bacillus isolated from soil. Turk. J. Biol. 26(1), 41–48 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Behera, S. Physiochemical and Microbial Analysis of Soil and Water of Dhobiajharan Village (Proposed Coal Mine Site-Tubed). Doctoral dissertation (2013).

  21. Kones, C., Mwajita, M., Kariuki, L., Kiirika, L. & Kavoo, A. Isolation and characterization of rhizospheric microorganisms from bacterial wilt endemic areas in Kenya. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 14(7), 349–360 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, X., Heazlewood, S. P., Krause, D. O. & Florin, T. H. J. Molecular characterization of the microbial species that colonize human ileal and colonic mucosa by using 16S rDNA sequence analysis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 95(3), 508–520 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nikunjkumar, B. D. Molecular Identification of Bacteria Using 16s rDNA Sequencing (Gujarat University, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Janda, J. M. & Abbott, S. L. 16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification in the diagnostic laboratory: Pluses, perils, and pitfalls. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45(9), 2761–2764 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sting, R., Eisenberg, T. & Hrubenja, M. Rapid and reasonable molecular identification of bacteria and fungi in microbiological diagnostics using rapid real-time PCR and Sanger sequencing. J. Microbiol. Methods 159, 148–156 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chen, L. et al. Rapid Sanger sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene for identification of some common pathogens. PLoS ONE 9(2), e88886 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Crossley, B. M. et al. Guidelines for Sanger sequencing and molecular assay monitoring. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 32(6), 767–775 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Buckley, T. R., Simon, C. & Chambers, G. K. Exploring among-site rate variation models in a maximum likelihood framework using empirical data: Effects of model assumptions on estimates of topology, branch lengths, and bootstrap support. Syst. Biol. 50(1), 67–86 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mello, B. Estimating timetrees with MEGA and the TimeTree resource. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35(9), 2334–2342 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tamura, K. et al. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28(10), 2731–2739 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Soni, R. & Keharia, H. Phytostimulation and biocontrol potential of Gram-positive endospore-forming bacilli. Planta 254(3), 49 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hernández-Fernández, G., Galán, B., Carmona, M., Castro, L. & García, J. L. Transcriptional response of the xerotolerant Arthrobacter sp. Helios strain to PEG-induced drought stress. Front. Microbiol. 13, 1009068 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chen, Y. et al. Current studies of the effects of drought stress on root exudates and rhizosphere microbiomes of crop plant species. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23(4), 2374 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, Y. et al. Evaluation of Rpf protein of Micrococcus luteus for cultivation of soil actinobacteria. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 44(5), 126234 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ansari, F. A., Ahmad, I. & Khan, A. S. Recent molecular tools for analyzing microbial diversity in rhizosphere ecosystem. In Microbial Diversity in the Genomic Era 233–246. (Academic Press, 2024).

  36. Soares, M. B. et al. Sporeforming probiotic bacteria: Characteristics, health benefits, and technological aspects for their applications in foods and beverages. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 138, 453–469 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ma, B. et al. Evaluation of in vitro production capabilities of indole derivatives by lactic acid bacteria. Microorganisms 13(1), 150 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bal, S. Amelioration of plant biotic stress by mycorrhiza helper bacteria. In Bio-control Agents for Sustainable Agriculture: Diversity, Mechanisms and Applications 359–384 (Springer, 2025).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lies, A., Delteil, A., Prin, Y., and Duponnois, R. (2018). Using mycorrhiza helper microorganisms (MHM) to improve the mycorrhizal efficiency on plant growth. In Role of Rhizospheric Microbes in Soil: Volume 1: Stress Management and Agricultural Sustainability 277–298.

  40. Hussain, A. & Ibrahim, M. Molecular characterization of *Bacillus subtilis* OKR isolated from wheat rhizosphere reveals key outer membrane proteins associated with plant growth promotion: A step towards climate-smart agriculture. Int. J. Appl. Exp. Biol. 4(1), 95–106 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Patil, B. L., Gopalkrishna, A. M. & Gm, S. K. Molecular characterization of an endophytic strain of Bacillus subtilis with plant growth-promoting properties from a wild relative of papaya. J. Appl. Microbiol. 136(1), lxaf010 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ibrahim, R., Aranjani, J. M., Prasanna, N., Biswas, A. & Gayam, P. K. R. Production, isolation, optimization, and characterization of microbial PHA from *Bacillus australimaris*. Sci. Rep. 15(1), 8395 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Liu, Y. et al. Unraveling the ecological interactions between dairy strains Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus cereus during the dual-species biofilm formation. Food Microbiol. 128, 104716 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sousa, E. G. et al. The research on the identification, taxonomy, and comparative genomics analysis of nine Bacillus velezensis strains significantly contributes to microbiology, genetics, bioinformatics, and biotechnology. Front. Microbiol. 16, 1544934 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  45. da Silva, P. T. L. et al. Biological modulatorns with Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis in compost barn. Cad. Pedagog. 22(5), e14872–e14872 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Das, S. et al. Bacillus ayatagriensis sp. nov., a novel plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria strain isolated from mulberry rhizosphere. Sci. Rep. 15, 26693 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Murag, S. et al. Molecular analysis of Bacillus anthracis isolates from Karnataka’s ruminant Anthrax outbreaks reveals genetic relationships and environmental factors Influencing spore persistence. Res. Microbiol. 8, 104343 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Nikolaidis, M. et al. A comparative analysis of the core proteomes within and among the Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus cereus evolutionary groups reveals the patterns of lineage-and species-specific adaptations. Microorganisms 10(9), 1720 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gonçalves, L. B. et al. Microbial inoculants and fertilizer reduction in Sorghum cultivation: Implications for sustainable agriculture. Microbiol. Res. 16, 115 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Petkar, G. V., Giri, G. K. & Charpe, A. M. Antagonistic potential of phylloplane Bacillus subtilis PBs4 isolate against grain mold fungi of sorghum in India. Int. J. Environ. Agric. Biotechnol. 10(3), 619305 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Uchegbu, N., Adepeju, A. B. & Fasuan, T. O. Bio-nutritional and microbiological quality assessment of tiger-nut-enriched instant sorghum kunu-zaki beverage as potential milk-analogue. Nutr. Food Sci. 55(7), 1202–1211 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Muhammad, S. A. et al. Effect of phosphate solubilizing Bacillus on the growth of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench). Niger. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 32(2), 58–66 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Adeleke, B. S., Ayangbenro, A. S. & Babalola, O. O. Genomic analysis of endophytic Bacillus cereus T4S and its plant growth-promoting traits. Plants 10(9), 1776 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Imtiyaz, T. Bioprospecting of Bacterial Endophytes Isolated from Himalayan Cold Desert for Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. Doctoral dissertation, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore (2022). https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/server/api/core/bitstreams/3bcba48a-b721-4845-a0a8-f0c62d47047e/content

  55. Aehsas, S. et al. Morpho-biochemical and molecular characterization of Bacillus subtilis and Priestia megaterium isolates from eastern Indian farmlands. Mol. Biol. Rep. 52(1), 706 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Satapathy, S. S., Priyadarshini, B., Subhadarshini, S., Nayak, J., Kuldip, R. & Sahoo, J. P. Pangenomics for studying plant-microbe interactions. In Plant Pangenomes and Pangenomics 347–360. (Academic Press, 2025).

  57. Mishra, A. P., Sahoo, J. P., Padhi, P. P., Pattnaik, S. & Jena, L. Applications of horizontal gene transfer in soil bioremediation. In Bioremediation and Phytoremediation Technologies in Sustainable Soil Management 171–203. (Apple Academic Press, 2022).

  58. Raimi, A. & Adeleke, R. 16S rRNA gene-based identification and plant growth-promoting potential of cultivable endophytic bacteria. Agron. J. 115(3), 1447–1462 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Okechukwu, E. C. et al. Pea-saving partners: Bacillus and pseudomonas combat downy mildew in pea crops. Plant Pathol. 75(1), e70095 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Patra, D., Mishra, S., Mohanty, J., Subhadarsani, S. & Sahoo, J. P. Harnessing the plant microbiome: a genomic and metagenomic perspective for sustainable agriculture. Acad. Mol. Biol. Genom. https://doi.org/10.20935/AcadMolBioGen7892 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Related Posts