Reflections on bio-based PET and plastic waste management: a responsible research and innovation approach

Posted on
reflections-on-bio-based-pet-and-plastic-waste-management:-a-responsible-research-and-innovation-approach
Reflections on bio-based PET and plastic waste management: a responsible research and innovation approach

References

  1. OECD. Global Plastics Outlook: Policy Scenarios to 2060 [Internet]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1787/aa1edf33-en (OECD Publishing, 2022).

  2. Kakadellis, S. & Rosetto, G. Achieving a circular bioeconomy for plastics. Science 373, 49–50 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. OECD. What can policy makers and stakeholders do? [Internet]. Available from: https://web-archive.oecd.org/2022-06-21/622469-what-can-policy-makers-and-stakeholders-do.htm (2022).

  4. European Patent Office. Patents for tomorrows plastics: global innovation trends in recycling, circular design and alternative sources [Internet]. Available from: https://link.epo.org/web/patents_for_tomorrows_plastics_study_en.pdf (2021).

  5. Carniel, A., Waldow, V. deA. & Castro, A. M. de A comprehensive and critical review on key elements to implement enzymatic PET depolymerization for recycling purposes. Biotechnol. Adv. 52, 107811 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Taghavi, N., Udugama, I. A., Zhuang, W. Q. & Baroutian, S. Challenges in biodegradation of non-degradable thermoplastic waste: from environmental impact to operational readiness. Biotechnol. Adv. 49, 107731 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Andler, R. et al. Current progress on the biodegradation of synthetic plastics: from fundamentals to biotechnological applications. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 21, 829–850 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lomwongsopon, P. & Varrone, C. Critical review on the progress of plastic bioupcycling technology as a potential solution for sustainable plastic waste management. Polymers 14, 4996 (2022).

  9. Orlando, M. et al. Microbial enzyme biotechnology to reach plastic waste circularity: current status, problems and perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 3877 (2023).

  10. Thew, C. X. E., Lee, Z. S., Srinophakun, P. & Ooi, C. W. Recent advances and challenges in sustainable management of plastic waste using biodegradation approach. Bioresour. Technol. 374, 128772 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tournier, V. et al. Enzymes’ power for plastics degradation. Chem. Rev. 123, 5612–5701 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Soong, Y. H. V. et al. Enzyme selection, optimization, and production toward biodegradation of post-consumer poly(ethylene terephthalate) at scale. Biotechnol. J. 18, 2300119 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wei, R., Westh, P., Weber, G., Blank, L. M. & Bornscheuer, U. T. Standardization guidelines and future trends for PET hydrolase research. Nat. Commun. 16, 4684 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wei, R., Weber, G., Blank, L. M. & Bornscheuer, U. T. Process insights for harnessing biotechnology for plastic depolymerization. Nat. Chem. Eng. 2, 110–117 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bergeson, A. R., Silvera, A. J. & Alper, H. S. Bottlenecks in biobased approaches to plastic degradation. Nat. Commun. 15, 4715 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dhali, S. L., Parida, D., Kumar, B. & Bala, K. Recent trends in microbial and enzymatic plastic degradation: a solution for plastic pollution predicaments. Biotechnol. Sustain. Mater. 1, 11 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosini, E., Antonelli, N. & Molla, G. Rethinking plastic waste: innovations in enzymatic breakdown of oil-based polyesters and bioplastics. FEBS Open Bio. https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.70120 (2025).

  18. Mohanan, N., Montazer, Z., Sharma, P. K. & Levin, D. B. Microbial and enzymatic degradation of synthetic plastics. Front. Microbiol. 11, 580709 (2020).

  19. Wei, R. et al. Conformational fitting of a flexible oligomeric substrate does not explain the enzymatic PET degradation. Nat. Commun. 10, 5581 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bååth, J. A., Borch, K., Jensen, K., Brask, J. & Westh, P. Comparative biochemistry of four polyester (PET) hydrolases. ChemBioChem 22, 1627–1637 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brizendine, R. K. et al. Particle size reduction of poly(ethylene terephthalate) increases the rate of enzymatic depolymerization but does not increase the overall conversion extent. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 10, 9131–9140 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yoshida, S., Hiraga, K., Taniguchi, I. & Oda, K. Ideonella sakaiensis, PETase, and MHETase: From identification of microbial PET degradation to enzyme characterization. In Methods in Enzymology [Internet] (eds Weber, G., Bornscheuer, U. T., Wei, R.).Ch. 9, 187–205. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0076687920303736 (Academic Press, 2021).

  23. Furukawa, M., Kawakami, N., Oda, K. & Miyamoto, K. Acceleration of enzymatic degradation of poly (ethylene terephthalate) by surface coating with anionic surfactants. ChemSusChem 11, 4018–4025 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Clark, R. A. & Shaver, M. P. Depolymerization within a circular plastics system. Chem. Rev. 124, 2617–2650 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thomsen, T. B., Hunt, C. J. & Meyer, A. S. Influence of substrate crystallinity and glass transition temperature on enzymatic degradation of polyethylene terephthalate (PET). N. Biotechnol. 69, 28–35 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tournier, V. et al. An engineered PET depolymerase to break down and recycle plastic bottles. Nature 580, 216–219 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thomsen, T. B., Almdal, K. & Meyer, A. S. Significance of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) substrate crystallinity on enzymatic degradation. N. Biotechnol. 78, 162–172 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yoshida, S. et al. A bacterium that degrades and assimilates poly(ethylene terephthalate). Science 351, 1196–1199 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Seo, H. et al. Landscape profiling of PET depolymerases using a natural sequence cluster framework. Science 387, eadp5637 (2025).

  30. Erickson, E. et al. Sourcing thermotolerant poly(ethylene terephthalate) hydrolase scaffolds from natural diversity. Nat. Commun. 13, 7850 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sulaiman, S. et al. Isolation of a novel cutinase homolog with polyethylene terephthalate-degrading activity from leaf-branch compost by using a metagenomic approach. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 1556–1562 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wu, B. et al. Harnessing protein language model for structure-based discovery of highly efficient and robust PET hydrolases. Nat. Commun. 16, 6211 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Norton-Baker, B. et al. Machine learning-guided identification of PET hydrolases from natural diversity. ACS Catal. 15, 16070–16083 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chamas, A. et al. Degradation rates of plastics in the environment. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8, 3494–3511 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Knott, B. C. et al. Characterization and engineering of a two-enzyme system for plastics depolymerization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 25476–25485 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sonnendecker, C. et al. Low carbon footprint recycling of post-consumer PET plastic with a metagenomic polyester hydrolase. ChemSusChem 15, e202101062 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lu, H. et al. Machine learning-aided engineering of hydrolases for PET depolymerization. Nature 604, 662–667 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Guicherd, M. et al. An engineered enzyme embedded into PLA to make self-biodegradable plastic. Nature 631, 884–890 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Branson, Y. et al. Urethanases for the enzymatic hydrolysis of low molecular weight carbamates and the recycling of polyurethanes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202216220 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bayer, T. et al. Structural elucidation of a metagenomic urethanase and its engineering towards enhanced hydrolysis profiles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63, e202404492 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Stepnov, A. A. et al. Revisiting the activity of two poly (vinyl chloride)- and polyethylene-degrading enzymes. Nat. Commun. 15, 8501 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sadler, J. C. & Wallace, S. Microbial synthesis of vanillin from waste poly (ethylene terephthalate). Green. Chem. 23, 4665–4672 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Molpeceres-García, F. J. et al. Pseudomonas putida JM37 as a novel bacterial chassis for ethylene glycol upcycling. Bioresour. Technol. 443, 133884 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Banks, A. M. et al. Degradation of PET plastic with engineered environmental bacteria. bioRxiv 24, 614569 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Johnson, N. W. et al. A biocompatible Lossen rearrangement in Escherichia coli. Nat. Chem. 17, 1020–1026 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Liu, P. et al. Potential one-step strategy for PET degradation and PHB biosynthesis through co-cultivation of two engineered microorganisms. Eng. Microbiol. 1, 1–100003 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Narancic, T. et al. Genome analysis of the metabolically versatile Pseudomonas umsongensis GO16: the genetic basis for PET monomer upcycling into polyhydroxyalkanoates. Microb. Biotechnol. 14, 2463–2480 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tiso, T. et al. Towards bio-upcycling of polyethylene terephthalate. Metab. Eng. 66, 167–178 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Peng, Y., Prabhu, A. & Rinke, C. Facing our plastic waste crisis: biorecycling as a promising solution. Microbiol. Aust. 44, 52–56 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Roy, D., Berry, E., Orr, K. & Dempster, M. Barriers to recycling plastics from the perspectives of industry stakeholders: a qualitative study. J. Integr. Environ. Sci. 20, 2190379 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Asveld, L., Osseweijer, P. & Posada, J. A. Societal and ethical issues in Industrial Biotechnology. In Sustainability and Life Cycle Assessment in Industrial Biotechnology [Internet]. (eds Fröhling, M. & Hiete M.) 121–141. (Springer International Publishing, 2020). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2019_100.

  52. Woolley, R., Otero-Hermida, P., Monsonís-Payá, I. & Wicher, M. In Responsible Research and Innovation 32–45. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/19695_4.html (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024).

  53. Owen, R., Macnaghten, P. & Stilgoe, J. Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society. Sci. Public Policy 39, 751–760 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Stilgoe, J., Owen, R. & Macnaghten, P. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res. Policy 42, 1568–1580 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Von Schomberg, R. Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation. SSRN Journal [Internet]. [cited 2026 Jan 29]. Available from: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2439112 (2011).

  56. Ten Holter, C., Kunze, L., Pattinson, J. A., Salvini, P. & Jirotka, M. Responsible innovation; responsible data. A case study in autonomous driving. J. Responsible Technol. 11, 100038 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  57. de Saille, S. Innovating innovation policy: the emergence of ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’. J. Responsible Innov. 2, 152–168 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ribeiro, B. E., Smith, R. D. J. & Millar, K. A mobilising concept? Unpacking academic representations of responsible research and innovation. Sci. Eng. Ethics 23, 81–103 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  59. EPSRC. Framework for responsible research and innovation [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ukri.org/who-we-are/epsrc/our-policies-and-standards/framework-for-responsible-innovation/.

  60. Wei, R. et al. Possibilities and limitations of biotechnological plastic degradation and recycling. Nat. Catal. 3, 867–871 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wongsatit, T., Srimora, T., Kiattisewee, C. & Uttamapinant, C. Enzymes, auxiliaries, and cells for the recycling and upcycling of polyethylene terephthalate. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 38, 100515 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Alamsyah, A. & Ramdhani, S. F. N. How can a plastic credit system improve traceability and verifiability in plastic waste management?. Waste Manag. Bull. 3, 100250 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Extended Producer Responsibility [Internet]. (Ellen McArthur Foundation, 2021) Available from: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/extended-producer-responsibility/epr-statement.

  64. Qiu, J. et al. A comprehensive review on enzymatic biodegradation of polyethylene terephthalate. Environ. Res. 240, 117427 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Zhu, B., Chen, Y. & Wei, N. Engineering biocatalytic and biosorptive materials for environmental applications. Trends Biotechnol. 37, 661–676 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Magnin, A., Entzmann, L., Pollet, E. & Avérous, L. Breakthrough in polyurethane bio-recycling: an efficient laccase-mediated system for the degradation of different types of polyurethanes. Waste Manag. 132, 23–30 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Uekert, T. et al. Technical, economic, and environmental comparison of closed-loop recycling technologies for common plastics. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 11, 965–978 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Quartinello, F. et al. Highly selective enzymatic recovery of building blocks from wool-cotton-polyester textile waste blends. Polymers 10, 1107 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Branson, Y. et al. One-pot depolymerization of mixed plastics using a dual enzyme system. ChemSusChem 18, e202402416 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Kremser, K. et al. Bioleaching/enzyme-based recycling of aluminium and polyethylene from beverage cartons packaging waste. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 185, 106444 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Carbios, On, Patagonia, PUMA and Salomon team up to advance circularity in the textile industry [Internet]. (Carbios, 2022). Available from: https://www.carbios.com/en/carbios-on-patagonia-puma-and-salomon-team-up/.

  72. Kaabel, S. et al. Solid-state enzymatic hydrolysis of mixed PET/cotton textiles. ChemSusChem 16, e202201613 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Maddela, N. R., Kakarla, D., Venkateswarlu, K. & Megharaj, M. Additives of plastics: entry into the environment and potential risks to human and ecological health. J. Environ. Manag. 348, 119364 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Hahladakis, J. N., Velis, C. A., Weber, R., Iacovidou, E. & Purnell, P. An overview of chemical additives present in plastics: migration, release, fate and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling. J. Hazard. Mater. 344, 179–199 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Wagner, S. & Schlummer, M. Legacy additives in a circular economy of plastics: current dilemma, policy analysis, and emerging countermeasures. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 158, 104800 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Danso, D., Chow, J. & Streit, W. R. Plastics: environmental and biotechnological perspectives on microbial degradation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85, e01095-19 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Schultz, F. C. & Reinhardt, R. J. Technological challenges and opportunities to plastics valorization in the context of a circular economy in Europe. Sustainability 15, 3741 (2023).

  78. Harris, B. A., Zhou, J., Clarke, B. O. & Leung, I. K. H. Enzymatic degradation of PFAS: current status and ongoing challenges. ChemSusChem 18, e202401122 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Winiarska, E., Jutel, M. & Zemelka-Wiacek, M. The potential impact of nano- and microplastics on human health: understanding human health risks. Environ. Res. 251, 118535 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Hooge, A. et al. Fate of microplastics in sewage sludge and in agricultural soils. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 166, 117184 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Arab, M., Yu, J. & Nayebi, B. Microplastics in sludges and soils: a comprehensive review on distribution, characteristics, and effects. ChemEngineering 8, 86 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Hechmi, S. et al. Soil contamination with microplastics (MPs) from treated wastewater and sewage sludge: risks and sustainable mitigation strategies. Discov. Environ. 2, 95 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Casella, C., Sol, D., Laca, A. & Díaz, M. Microplastics in sewage sludge: a review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 63382–63415 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Washing machines filters to tackle microplastic [Internet]. (Textile Technology, 2023). Available from: https://man-made-fibers.textiletechnology.net/news/trendreports/eu-whitepaper-challenges-commission-to-tackle-microplastic-pollution-33929.

  85. Abourich, M., Bellamy, A., Ajji, A. & Claveau-Mallet, D. Washing machine filters to mitigate microplastics release: citizen science study to estimate microfibers capture potential and assess their social acceptability. Environ. Chall. 16, 100984 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Palacios-Mateo, C., Huerta-Lwanga, E., Harings, J. A. W. & Blank, L. M. Enzymatic remediation of polyester microfibers in sewage sludge and green compost samples. Microplastics Nanoplastics 5, 26 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Schöpfer, L. et al. Hydrolyzable microplastics in soil—low biodegradation but formation of a specific microbial habitat?. Biol. Fertil. Soils 58, 471–486 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Lofty, J., Muhawenimana, V., Wilson, C. A. M. E. & Ouro, P. Microplastics removal from a primary settler tank in a wastewater treatment plant and estimations of contamination onto European agricultural land via sewage sludge recycling. Environ. Pollut. 304, 119198 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Chemla, Y., Sweeney, C. J., Wozniak, C. A. & Voigt, C. A. Design and regulation of engineered bacteria for environmental release. Nat. Microbiol. 10, 281–300 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Tang, K. H. D. Bioaugmentation of anaerobic wastewater treatment sludge digestion: a perspective on microplastics removal. J. Clean. Prod. 387, 135864 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Perz, V. et al. Hydrolysis of synthetic polyesters by Clostridium botulinum esterases. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 113, 1024–1034 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Yan, F., Wei, R., Cui, Q., Bornscheuer, U. T. & Liu, Y. J. Thermophilic whole-cell degradation of polyethylene terephthalate using engineered Clostridium thermocellum. Microb. Biotechnol. 14, 374–385 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Bao, T., Qian, Y., Xin, Y., Collins, J. J. & Lu, T. Engineering microbial division of labor for plastic upcycling. Nat. Commun. 14, 5712 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Brandenberg, O. F., Schubert, O. T. & Kruglyak, L. Towards synthetic PETtrophy: engineering Pseudomonas putida for concurrent polyethylene terephthalate (PET) monomer metabolism and PET hydrolase expression. Microb. Cell Factories 21, 119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Doñate Hernández, S. Applying enzymes for microplastic degradation in sewage sludge [Internet]. (Enzycle, 2022). Available from: https://www.enzycle.eu/enzymes-for-microplastic-degradation/.

  96. Kushwaha, A., Goswami, L., Singhvi, M. & Kim, B. S. Biodegradation of poly(ethylene terephthalate): Mechanistic insights, advances, and future innovative strategies. Chem. Eng. J. 457, 141230 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Zhu, B., Wang, D. & Wei, N. Enzyme discovery and engineering for sustainable plastic recycling. Trends Biotechnol. 40, 22–37 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Uekert, T. et al. Life cycle assessment of enzymatic poly(ethylene terephthalate) recycling. Green. Chem. 24, 6531–6543 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Singh, A. et al. Techno-economic, life-cycle, and socioeconomic impact analysis of enzymatic recycling of poly(ethylene terephthalate). Joule 5, 2479–2503 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Carbios. CARBIOS celebrates the groundbreaking of its PET biorecycling plant, a world first, with its partners [Internet]. Available from: https://www.carbios.com/newsroom/en/carbios-celebrates-the-groundbreaking-of-its-pet-biorecycling-plant/.

  101. Murphy, N. P. et al. Process innovations to enable viable enzymatic poly(ethylene terephthalate) recycling. Nat. Chem. Eng. 2, 309–320 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Lee, A. & Liew, M. S. Tertiary recycling of plastics waste: an analysis of feedstock, chemical and biological degradation methods. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 23, 32–43 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Arnal, G. et al. Assessment of four engineered PET degrading enzymes considering large-scale industrial applications. ACS Catal. 13, 13156–13166 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Paparella, A. N. et al. Use of deep eutectic solvents in plastic depolymerization. Catalysts 13, 1035 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Wain, B. et al. Is solvent-based dissolution and precipitation an effective substrate pretreatment for the enzymatic depolymerisation of poly(ethylene terephthalate)?. Faraday Discuss. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5FD00061K (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Chang, A. C. et al. Understanding consequences and tradeoffs of melt processing as a pretreatment for enzymatic depolymerization of poly (ethylene terephthalate). Macromol. Rapid Commun. 43, 2100929 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  107. Sánchez-Rivera, K. L. et al. A solvent-targeted recovery and precipitation scheme for the recycling of up to ten polymers from post-industrial mixed plastic waste. Waste Manag. 194, 290–297 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  108. Chen, W. et al. Biomass-derived γ-valerolactone: efficient dissolution and accelerated alkaline hydrolysis of polyethylene terephthalate. Green. Chem. 23, 4065–4073 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  109. Chaudhari, U. S. et al. Solvent based dissolution–precipitation of waste polyethylene terephthalate: economic and environmental performance metrics. RSC Sustain. 1, 1849–1860 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  110. Kawai, F., Iizuka, R. & Kawabata, T. Engineered polyethylene terephthalate hydrolases: perspectives and limits. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 108, 404 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  111. Groseclose, T. M. & Nguyen, H. B. Recent advances in enzyme engineering for improved deconstruction of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) plastics. Commun. Mater. 6, 190 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  112. Haki, G. D. & Rakshit, S. K. Developments in industrially important thermostable enzymes: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 89, 17–34 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  113. Richter, P. K. et al. Structure and function of the metagenomic plastic-degrading polyester hydrolase PHL7 bound to its product. Nat. Commun. 14, 1905 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  114. Castro-Rodríguez, J. A., Rodríguez-Sotres, R. & Farrés, A. Determinants for an efficient enzymatic catalysis in poly (ethylene terephthalate) degradation. Catalysts 13, 591 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  115. Avilan, L. et al. Concentration-dependent inhibition of mesophilic PETases on poly (ethylene terephthalate) can be eliminated by enzyme engineering. ChemSusChem 16, e202202277 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  116. Charlier, C. et al. Exploring the pH dependence of an improved PETase. Biophys. J. 123, 1542–1552 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  117. Valenzuela-Ortega, M., Suitor, J. T., White, M. F. M., Hinchcliffe, T. & Wallace, S. Microbial upcycling of waste PET to adipic acid. ACS Cent. Sci. 9, 2057–2063 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  118. Kenny, S. T. et al. Up-cycling of PET (Polyethylene terephthalate) to the biodegradable plastic PHA (Polyhydroxyalkanoate). Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 7696–7701 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  119. Narancic, T. et al. Biodegradable plastic blends create new possibilities for end-of-life management of plastics but they are not a panacea for plastic pollution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 10441–10452 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  120. Wu, S., Hooks, D. & Brightwell, G. Current understanding on the heterogenous expression of plastic depolymerising enzymes in Pichia pastoris. Bioengineering 12, 68 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  121. Huang, X. et al. Tat-independent secretion of polyethylene terephthalate hydrolase PETase in Bacillus subtilis 168 mediated by its native signal peptide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 66, 13217–13227 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  122. Wang, N. et al. Enhancing secretion of polyethylene terephthalate hydrolase PETase in Bacillus subtilis WB600 mediated by the SPamy signal peptide. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 71, 235–241 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  123. Liang, H. et al. High-efficiency secretory expression of polyethylene terephthalate hydrolases in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens 205 and complete degradation of PET by its crude enzyme. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 330, 148111 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  124. Dutra Molino, J. V. et al. Efficient secretion of a plastic degrading enzyme from the green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Sci. Rep. 15, 24690 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  125. Carbios aims to be a leader in growing r-PET market with an ambition to capture 8 to 12% share by 2035 through licensing model [Internet]. (Carbios, 2023). Available from: https://www.carbios.com/en/strategic-update-2023/.

  126. Selmi, R., Hammoudeh, S., Kasmaoui, K., Sousa, R. M. & Errami, Y. The dual shocks of the COVID-19 and the oil price collapse: A spark or a setback for the circular economy? Energy Econ. 109, 105913 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  127. OECD. Global Plastics Outlook: Economic Drivers, Environmental Impacts and Policy Options. (OECD Publishing, 2022). Available from:https://doi.org/10.1787/de747aef-en.

  128. PET Market in Europe State of Play 2022. (Eunomia, 2022). Available from: https://www.plasticsrecyclers.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/PET_REPORT2022_June2023.pdf.

  129. Where is Europe’s PET Industry at in 2025?. (Packaging Europe, 2025). Available from: https://packagingeurope.com/features/where-is-europes-pet-industry-at-in-2025/12499.article.

  130. Hadley, S. Recycled PET Market—Supply & Demand Market Issues. (Plastic Collective, 2022). Available from: https://www.plasticcollective.co/recycled-pet-market-supply-demand-market-issues/.

  131. Raubenheimer, K. & Urho, N. Rethinking global governance of plastics—the role of industry. Mar. Policy 113, 103802 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  132. Vidal, F. et al. Designing a circular carbon and plastics economy for a sustainable future. Nature 626, 45–57 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  133. Larrain, M., Billen, P. & Van Passel, S. The effect of plastic packaging recycling policy interventions as a complement to extended producer responsibility schemes: A partial equilibrium model. Waste Manag. 153, 355–366 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  134. The UK Plastics Pact: A Roadmap to 2025. (Wrap, 2022).

  135. Deposit Return Scheme for Drinks Containers: Joint Policy Statement. (DEFRA, 2023). Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/deposit-return-scheme-for-drinks-containers-policy-statements/deposit-return-scheme-for-drinks-containers-joint-policy-statement.

  136. zu Castell-Rudenhausen, M. et al. Investigating Europe’s Secondary Raw Material Markets. (Publications Office of the European Union, 2022).

  137. Tallapragada, M., Hardy, B. W., Lybrand, E. & Hallman, W. K. Impact of abstract versus concrete conceptualization of genetic modification (GM) technology on public perceptions. Risk Anal. 41, 976–991 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  138. Dallendörfer, M., Dieken, S., Henseleit, M., Siekmann, F. & Venghaus, S. Investigating citizens’ perceptions of the bioeconomy in Germany—high support but little understanding. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 30, 16–30 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  139. Ribul, M. et al. Mechanical, chemical, biological: moving towards closed-loop bio-based recycling in a circular economy of sustainable textiles. J. Clean. Prod. 326, 129325 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  140. Smith, M., Wain, B. & Miles, R. Puppets as engineers of the imagination: using performing objects to communicate innovative enzyme science. Res. All. (2025) [cited 2025 Nov 28];9. Available from: https://journals.uclpress.co.uk/r4a/article/id/3407/.

  141. Public Attitudes Towards Synthetic Biology [Internet]. (CSIRO, 2021). Available from: https://research.csiro.au/synthetic-biology-fsp/public-attitudes/.

  142. Carbios’ biotechnologies recognized by consumers as the most promising solutions helping to solve the plastic pollution issue [Internet]. (Carbios, 2022). Available from: https://www.carbios.com/en/carbios-biotechnologies-recognized-by-consumers-as-the-most-promising-solutions-helping-to-solve-the-plastic-pollution-issue/.

Download references