Reversible surface modifications of functional proteins for accelerated cytosolic delivery via cell-penetrating peptide clusters

References

Carter, P. J. & Lazar, G. A. Next generation antibody drugs: pursuit of the ‘high-hanging fruit’. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 17, 197–223 (2018).

Google Scholar
Schneider, A. F. L., Benz, L. S., Lehmann, M. & Hackenberger, C. P. R. Cell-permeable nanobodies allow dual-color super-resolution microscopy in untransfected living cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 22075–22080 (2021).

Google Scholar
Mann, G., Sadhu, P. & Brik, A. Synthetic proteins behind the plasma barrier: molecular spies. Acc. Chem. Res. 55, 2055–2067 (2022).

Google Scholar
Stewart, M. P. et al. In vitro and ex vivo strategies for intracellular delivery. Nature 538, 183–192 (2016).

Google Scholar
Saha, A. et al. Suspension bead loading (SBL): An economical protein delivery platform to study URM1’s behavior in live cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63, e202410135 (2024).

Google Scholar
Lawrence, M. S., Phillips, K. J. & Liu, D. R. Supercharging proteins can impart unusual resilience. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 10110–10112 (2007).

Google Scholar
Mandal, S., Mann, G., Satish, G. & Brik, A. Enhanced live-cell delivery of synthetic proteins assisted by cell-penetrating peptides fused to DABCYL. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 7333–7343 (2021).

Google Scholar
Dougherty, P. G., Sahni, A. & Pei, D. Understanding cell penetration of cyclic peptides. Chem. Rev. 119, 10241–10287 (2019).

Google Scholar
Nischan, N. et al. Covalent attachment of cyclic TAT peptides to GFP results in protein delivery into live cells with immediate bioavailability. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 1950–1953 (2015).

Google Scholar
Herce, H. D. et al. Cell-permeable nanobodies for targeted immunolabelling and antigen manipulation in living cells. Nat. Chem. 9, 762–771 (2017).

Google Scholar
Schneider, A. F. L., Kithil, M., Cardoso, M. C., Lehmann, M. & Hackenberger, C. P. R. Cellular uptake of large biomolecules enabled by cell-surface-reactive cell-penetrating peptide additives. Nat. Chem. 13, 530–539 (2021).

Google Scholar
Erazo-Oliveras, A. et al. Protein delivery into live cells by incubation with an endosomolytic agent. Nat. Methods 11, 861–867 (2014).

Google Scholar
Akishiba, M. et al. Cytosolic antibody delivery by lipid-sensitive endosomolytic peptide. Nat. Chem. 9, 751–761 (2017).

Google Scholar
Tietz, O., Cortezon-Tamarit, F., Chalk, R., Able, S. & Vallis, K. A. Tricyclic cell-penetrating peptides for efficient delivery of functional antibodies into cancer cells. Nat. Chem. 14, 284–293 (2022).

Google Scholar
Meledin, R., Mali, S. M., Kleifeld, O. & Brik, A. Activity-based probes developed by applying a sequential dehydroalanine formation strategy to expressed proteins reveal a potential α-Globin-modulating deubiquitinase. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 5645–5649 (2018).

Google Scholar
Mishra, V. et al. IL-1β turnover by the UBE2L3 ubiquitin conjugating enzyme and HECT E3 ligases limits inflammation. Nat. Commun. 14, 4385 (2023).

Google Scholar
Chen, J., Ai, Y., Wang, J., Haracska, L. & Zhuang, Z. Chemically ubiquitylated PCNA as a probe for eukaryotic translesion DNA synthesis. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6, 270–272 (2010).

Google Scholar
Brock, D. J. et al. Efficient cell delivery mediated by lipid-specific endosomal escape of supercharged branched peptides. Traffic 19, 421–435 (2018).

Google Scholar
Liu, Z. et al. The antioxidant activity and genotoxicity of isogarcinol. Food Chem 253, 5–12 (2018).

Google Scholar
Pei, D. & Buyanova, M. Overcoming endosomal entrapment in drug delivery. Bioconjugate Chem 30, 273–283 (2019).

Google Scholar
Giustarini, D., Dalle-Donne, I., Milzani, A., Fanti, P. & Rossi, R. Analysis of GSH and GSSG after derivatization with N-ethylmaleimide. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1660–1669 (2013).

Google Scholar
Angeles-Boza, A. M., Erazo-Oliveras, A., Lee, Y.-J. & Pellois, J.-P. Generation of endosomolytic reagents by branching of cell-penetrating peptides: tools for the delivery of bioactive compounds to live cells in cis or trans. Bioconjugate Chem 21, 2164–2167 (2010).

Google Scholar
Costes, S. V. et al. Automatic and quantitative measurement of protein-protein colocalization in live cells. Biophys. J. 86, 3993–4003 (2004).

Google Scholar
Teo, S. L. Y. et al. Unravelling cytosolic delivery of cell penetrating peptides with a quantitative endosomal escape assay. Nat. Commun. 12, 3721 (2021).

Google Scholar
Goldenthal, K. L., Pastan, I. & Willingham, M. C. Initial steps in receptor-mediated endocytosis. The influence of temperature on the shape and distribution of plasma membrane clathrin-coated pits in cultured mammalian cells. Exp. Cell Res. 152, 558–564 (1984).

Google Scholar
Hunt, L. et al. Low-temperature pausing of cultivated mammalian cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 89, 157–163 (2005).

Google Scholar
Hirose, H. et al. Transient focal membrane deformation induced by arginine-rich peptides leads to their direct penetration into cells. Mol. Ther. 20, 984–993 (2012).

Google Scholar
Sun, Y. et al. Phase-separating peptides for direct cytosolic delivery and redox-activated release of macromolecular therapeutics. Nat. Chem. 14, 274–283 (2022).

Google Scholar
Sangsuwan, R., Tachachartvanich, P. & Francis, M. B. Cytosolic delivery of proteins using amphiphilic polymers with 2-pyridinecarboxaldehyde groups for site-selective attachment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 2376–2383 (2019).

Google Scholar
Lin, Q. et al. Imaging the cytosolic drug delivery mechanism of HDL-like nanoparticles. Pharm. Res. 31, 1438–1449 (2014).

Google Scholar
Panja, P. & Jana, N. R. Lipid-raft-mediated direct cytosolic delivery of polymer-coated soft nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. B 124, 5323–5333 (2020).

Google Scholar
Los, D. A., Mironov, K. S. & Allakhverdiev, S. I. Regulatory role of membrane fluidity in gene expression and physiological functions. Photosynth. Res. 116, 489–509 (2013).

Google Scholar
Singh, R., Kats, L., Blättler, W. A. & Lambert, J. M. Formation of N-substituted 2-iminothiolanes when amino groups in proteins and peptides are modified by 2-iminothiolane. Anal. Biochem. 236, 114–125 (1996).

Google Scholar
Pjura, P. E., Grzeskowiak, K. & Dickerson, R. E. Binding of Hoechst 33258 to the minor groove of B-DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 197, 257–271 (1987).

Google Scholar
Riedl, J. et al. Lifeact: a versatile marker to visualize F-actin. Nat. Methods 5, 605–607 (2008).

Google Scholar
Ren, L., Lv, J., Wang, H. & Cheng, Y. A coordinative dendrimer achieves excellent efficiency in cytosolic protein and peptide delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 4711–4719 (2020).

Google Scholar
Zhang, S. et al. Robust reversible cross-linking strategy for intracellular protein delivery with excellent serum tolerance. Nano Lett 22, 8233–8240 (2022).

Google Scholar
Le, Z. et al. Direct cytosolic delivery of proteins and CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing by gemini amphiphiles via non-endocytic translocation pathways. ACS Cent. Sci. 9, 1313–1326 (2023).

Google Scholar
Chuah, J.-A. & Numata, K. Stimulus-responsive peptide for effective delivery and release of DNA in plants. Biomacromolecules 19, 1154–1163 (2018).

Google Scholar
Wu, H., Santana, I., Dansie, J. & Giraldo, J. P. In vivo delivery of nanoparticles into plant leaves. Curr. Protoc. Chem. Biol. 9, 269–284 (2017).

Google Scholar
David, Y., Vila-Perelló, M., Verma, S. & Muir, T. W. Chemical tagging and customizing of cellular chromatin states using ultrafast trans-splicing inteins. Nat. Chem. 7, 394–402 (2015).

Google Scholar
Demirer, G. S. et al. Carbon nanocarriers deliver siRNA to intact plant cells for efficient gene knockdown. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz0495 (2020).

Google Scholar
Arafiles, J. V. V. et al. Cell-surface-retained peptide additives for the cytosolic delivery of functional proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 24535–24548 (2023).

Google Scholar
Deshaies, R. J. & Joazeiro, C. A. RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 399–434 (2009).

Google Scholar
Mathur, S., Fletcher, A. J., Branigan, E., Hay, R. T. & Virdee, S. Photocrosslinking activity-based probes for ubiquitin RING E3 Ligases. Cell Chem. Biol. 27, 74–82 (2020).

Google Scholar
Dove, K. K. et al. Structural studies of HHARI/UbcH7∼Ub reveal unique E2∼Ub conformational restriction by RBR RING1. Structure 25, 890–900 (2017).

Google Scholar
Pan, M. et al. Quasi-racemic X-ray structures of K27-linked ubiquitin chains prepared by total chemical synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 7429–7435 (2016).

Google Scholar
Ai, H., Pan, M. & Liu, L. Chemical synthesis of human proteoforms and application in biomedicine. ACS Cent. Sci. 10, 1442–1459 (2024).

Google Scholar
Chu, G.-C. et al. Ferricyanide-promoted oxidative activation and ligation of protein thioacids in neutral aqueous media. CCS Chem 6, 2031–2043 (2024).

Google Scholar
Lechtenberg, B. C. et al. Structure of a HOIP/E2~ubiquitin complex reveals RBR E3 ligase mechanism and regulation. Nature 529, 546–550 (2016).

Google Scholar
Hua, F., Hao, W., Wang, L. & Li, S. Linear ubiquitination mediates EGFR-induced NF-κB pathway and tumor development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 11875 (2021).

Google Scholar
Mix, K. A., Lomax, J. E. & Raines, R. T. Cytosolic delivery of proteins by bioreversible esterification. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 14396–14398 (2017).

Google Scholar
Dong, S. et al. Recent advances in chemical protein synthesis: method developments and biological applications. Sci. China Chem. 67, 1060–1096 (2024).

Google Scholar
Yang, Z. et al. Advances in the chemical synthesis of human proteoforms. Sci. China Life Sci. 68, 2515–2549 (2025).

Google Scholar
Du, Y. et al. Mechanistic insights into the stimulation of the histone H3K9 methyltransferase Clr4 by proximal H3K14 ubiquitination. Sci. Adv. 11, eadu1864 (2025).

Google Scholar

Download references