Single-cell ultra-high-throughput multiplexed chromatin accessibility and gene expression sequencing (SUM-seq)

single-cell-ultra-high-throughput-multiplexed-chromatin-accessibility-and-gene-expression-sequencing-(sum-seq)
Single-cell ultra-high-throughput multiplexed chromatin accessibility and gene expression sequencing (SUM-seq)

Data availability

The raw data associated with Figs. 7 and 8 have been deposited to the European Genome Phenome archive under the dataset ID EGAD50000001589.

Code availability

The described computational pipeline for processing SUM-seq sequencing data is available at GitHub via https://git.embl.de/grp-zaugg/SUMseq.

References

  1. Baysoy, A., Bai, Z., Satija, R. & Fan, R. The technological landscape and applications of single-cell multi-omics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 695–713 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Badia-i-Mompel, P. et al. Gene regulatory network inference in the era of single-cell multi-omics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 24, 739–754 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Claringbould, A. & Zaugg, J. B. Enhancers in disease: molecular basis and emerging treatment strategies. Trends Mol. Med. 27, 1060–1073 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Xu, W. et al. ISSAAC-seq enables sensitive and flexible multimodal profiling of chromatin accessibility and gene expression in single cells. Nat. Methods 19, 1243–1249 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ma, S. et al. Chromatin potential identified by shared single-cell profiling of RNA and chromatin. Cell 183, 1103–1116.e20 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu, C. et al. An ultra high-throughput method for single-cell joint analysis of open chromatin and transcriptome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 1063–1070 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lareau, C. A. et al. Droplet-based combinatorial indexing for massive-scale single-cell chromatin accessibility. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 916–924 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lobato-Moreno, S. et al. Single-cell ultra-high-throughput multiplexed chromatin and RNA profiling reveals gene regulatory dynamics. Nat. Methods 22, 1213–1225 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Datlinger, P. et al. Ultra-high-throughput single-cell RNA sequencing and perturbation screening with combinatorial fluidic indexing. Nat. Methods 18, 635–642 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Di, L. et al. RNA sequencing by direct tagmentation of RNA/DNA hybrids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 2886–2893 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, H. et al. txci-ATAC-seq: a massive-scale single-cell technique to profile chromatin accessibility. Genome Biol. 25, 78 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bartosovic, M., Kabbe, M. & Castelo-Branco, G. Single-cell CUT&Tag profiles histone modifications and transcription factors in complex tissues. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 825–835 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Stoeckius, M. et al. Simultaneous epitope and transcriptome measurement in single cells. Nat. Methods 14, 865–868 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Otoničar, J. et al. HIPSD&R-seq enables scalable genomic copy number and transcriptome profiling. Genome Biol. 25, 316 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Clark, I. C. et al. Microfluidics-free single-cell genomics with templated emulsification. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1557–1566 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Picelli, S. et al. Tn5 transposase and tagmentation procedures for massively scaled sequencing projects. Genome Res. 24, 2033–2040 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hennig, B. P. et al. Large-scale low-cost NGS library preparation using a robust Tn5 purification and tagmentation protocol. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 8, 79–89 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaminow, B., Yunusov, D. & Dobin, A. STARsolo: accurate, fast and versatile mapping/quantification of single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq data. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.05.442755 (2021).

  19. Lun, A. T. L. et al. EmptyDrops: distinguishing cells from empty droplets in droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 20, 63 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, H. et al. Fast alignment and preprocessing of chromatin profiles with Chromap. Nat. Commun. 12, 6566 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902.e21 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wolf, F. A., Angerer, P. & Theis, F. J. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 19, 15 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Granja, J. M. et al. ArchR is a scalable software package for integrative single-cell chromatin accessibility analysis. Nat. Genet. 53, 403–411 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Stuart, T., Srivastava, A., Madad, S., Lareau, C. A. & Satija, R. Single-cell chromatin state analysis with Signac. Nat. Methods 18, 1333–1341 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. User Guide Chromium Next GEM Single Cell ATAC Reagent Kits v2. 10x Genomics Manual CG000496-Rev C (10x Genomics, 2024).

  26. Heumos, L. et al. Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities. Nat. Rev. Genet. 24, 550–572 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ashuach, T. et al. MultiVI: deep generative model for the integration of multimodal data. Nat. Methods 20, 1222–1231 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Argelaguet, R. et al. MOFA+: a statistical framework for comprehensive integration of multi-modal single-cell data. Genome Biol. 21, 111 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Piran, Z., Cohen, N., Hoshen, Y. & Nitzan, M. Disentanglement of single-cell data with biolord. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 1678–1683 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Nuclei Isolation for Single Cell Multiome ATAC + Gene Expression Sequencing. 10x Genomics Manual CG000365-Rev C (10x Genomics, 2025).

  31. Nuclei Isolation from Complex Tissues for Single Cell Multiome ATAC + Gene Expression Sequencing. 10x Genomics Manual CG000375-Rev C (10x Genomics, 2022).

  32. Nadelmann, E. R. et al. Isolation of nuclei from mammalian cells and tissues for single-nucleus molecular profiling. Curr. Protoc. 1, e132 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Slyper, M. et al. A single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq toolbox for fresh and frozen human tumors. Nat. Med. 26, 792–802 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Cusanovich, D. A. et al. The cis-regulatory dynamics of embryonic development at single-cell resolution. Nature 555, 538–542 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Han, M., Wei, G., McManus, C. E., Hillier, L. W. & Reinke, V. Isolated C. elegans germ nuclei exhibit distinct genomic profiles of histone modification and gene expression. BMC Genom. 20, 500 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Steiner, F. A., Talbert, P. B., Kasinathan, S., Deal, R. B. & Henikoff, S. Cell-type-specific nuclei purification from whole animals for genome-wide expression and chromatin profiling. Genome Res. 22, 766–777 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Durham, T. J. et al. Comprehensive characterization of tissue-specific chromatin accessibility in L2 Caenorhabditis elegans nematodes. Genome Res. 31, 1952–1969 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Thibivilliers, S. B., Anderson, D. K. & Libault, M. Y. Isolation of plant nuclei compatible with microfluidic single-nucleus ATAC-sequencing. Bio Protoc. 11, e4240 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Östlund, C. et al. Dynamics and molecular interactions of linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex proteins. J. Cell Sci. 122, 4099–4108 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Santinha, A. J. et al. Transcriptional linkage analysis with in vivo AAV-Perturb-seq. Nature 622, 367–375 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Deal, R. B. & Henikoff, S. The INTACT method for cell type–specific gene expression and chromatin profiling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Protoc. 6, 56–68 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the EMBL Genomic Core facility for help with sequencing, Protein Purification Core facility for Tn5 production, M. Snyder for providing hiPS cells and EMBL IT for access to the high-performance computing cluster used for all analyses. We further thank members of the Zaugg and the Noh group for extensive discussions during the development of the protocol. This work was supported by: the Cariplo foundation grant, the GSK basic research fund, the EMBL research fund, and the Novo Nordisk Foundation’s Research Leader Programme (to K.M.N.); The European Research Council (ERC, epiNicheAML, 101044873) and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – SFB 1709/1 2025 – 533056198 (to J.B.Z.); The Research council of Finland (347543), Sigrid Jusélius foundation, and Instrumentarium Science foundation (to M.M.). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Council. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Umut Yildiz

    Present address: Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland

  2. These authors contributed equally: Umut Yildiz, Sara Lobato-Moreno.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany

    Umut Yildiz, Sara Lobato-Moreno, Annique Claringbould, Víctor Campos-Fornés, Karin D. Prummel, Judith B. Zaugg, Kyung Min Noh & Mikael Marttinen

  2. Faculty of Biosciences, Collaboration for Joint PhD Degree between EMBL and Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany

    Umut Yildiz, Sara Lobato-Moreno & Víctor Campos-Fornés

  3. European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Molecular Systems Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany

    Sara Lobato-Moreno, Annique Claringbould, Hanke Gwendolyn Bauersachs, Nila H. Servaas, Evi P. Vlachou, Christian Arnold, Karin D. Prummel, Judith B. Zaugg & Mikael Marttinen

  4. Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

    Annique Claringbould

  5. Department of Biomedicine, Basel University, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    Hanke Gwendolyn Bauersachs & Judith B. Zaugg

  6. Molecular Medicine Partnership Unit, Heidelberg, Germany

    Judith B. Zaugg

  7. Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

    Kyung Min Noh

  8. Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

    Mikael Marttinen

Authors

  1. Umut Yildiz
  2. Sara Lobato-Moreno
  3. Annique Claringbould
  4. Hanke Gwendolyn Bauersachs
  5. Nila H. Servaas
  6. Evi P. Vlachou
  7. Christian Arnold
  8. Víctor Campos-Fornés
  9. Karin D. Prummel
  10. Judith B. Zaugg
  11. Kyung Min Noh
  12. Mikael Marttinen

Contributions

M.M., U.Y. and S.L.-M. designed and developed the core experimental protocol; H.G.B., K.D.P., N.H.S. and V.C.-F. assisted in the development of the experimental protocol; C.A., E.P.V., A.C. and M.M. designed and developed the computational pipeline; U.Y. and M.M. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors; U.Y., S.L.-M. and M.M. produced the figures for the manuscript; M.M., U.Y., K.M.N. and J.B.Z. supervised the project.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Umut Yildiz, Judith B. Zaugg, Kyung Min Noh or Mikael Marttinen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Protocols thanks Marek Bartosovic, Pascal Hunold and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key reference

Lobato-Moreno, S. et al. Nat. Methods 22, 1213–1225 (2025): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-025-02700-8

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Comparison of multimodal methods for profiling of chromatin accessibility and gene expression from the same nucleus.

A common step in all strategies is the dissociation of the tissue/sample to obtain a single cell suspension, and the tagmentation of open chromatin following nuclei isolation (1). The commercial 10x Epi multiome workflow continues with the encapsulation of single nuclei into individual droplets, and barcoding of open chromatin and nuclear mRNA, omitting the possibility to pool multiple samples and limiting the throughput (a). While ligation-based combinatorial indexing strategies (b) offer higher throughput and, in principle, allow multiplexing, the capability is constrained by the number of first barcodes utilized. Moreover, multiplexing is experimentally challenging, as barcodes are appended after the in situ chromatin tagmentation and reverse transcription steps. Lastly, the ligation-based barcoding compromises the data complexity and quality. Combinatorial microfluidic indexing, as used in SUM-seq (c) enables a one-step multiplexing option, resulting in increased throughput and high data complexity. Created with BioRender.com.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Protocol 1–5, Supplementary Figs. 1–6 and Supplementary Note.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Tables

Preindexing oligonucleotides for SUM-ATAC-seq. Preindexing oligonucleotides for SUM-RNA-seq. General oligonucleotides required for SUM-seq library preparation. Summary of optimization steps during the development of the SUM-seq protocol. Comparison between SUM-seq and other ATAC + RNA single-cell methods.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yildiz, U., Lobato-Moreno, S., Claringbould, A. et al. Single-cell ultra-high-throughput multiplexed chromatin accessibility and gene expression sequencing (SUM-seq). Nat Protoc (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-025-01310-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-025-01310-0