Tenoxicam-loaded bioglass/chitosan composites for bone tissue engineering: in vitro characterization, sustained drug release, and antimicrobial activity

Posted on
tenoxicam-loaded-bioglass/chitosan-composites-for-bone-tissue-engineering:-in-vitro-characterization,-sustained-drug-release,-and-antimicrobial-activity
Tenoxicam-loaded bioglass/chitosan composites for bone tissue engineering: in vitro characterization, sustained drug release, and antimicrobial activity

References

  1. Cobbin, B. Veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics. Aust. Vet. J. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1978.tb02411.x (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Riviere, J. E. & Papich, M. G. Veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics (Wiley, 2018).

  3. El-khooly, M. S. Evaluation of bone regeneration enhancement by in-vivo study using MAPTMS.. New Val. Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 3(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.21608/nujbas.2025.380531.1043 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Newman, H., Vernon, Y. & Varghese, S. Biomaterials resolution of inflammation in bone regeneration: from understandings to therapeutic applications. Biomaterials 277(September), 121114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121114 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Henrique, A., De Souza, J. R. & Trichês, E. D. S. Bioactive glasses for bone tissue engineering: a bibliometric study of the top 100-most cited papers. Odontology 113(2), 488–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-024-01027-8 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  6. El-khooly, M., Abdraboh, A., Bakr, A. & Ereiba, K. Preparation of a mixture of bioglass/sodium alginate doped with silver incorporated with graphene oxide.. Egypt. J. Biomed. Eng. Biophys. 24(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21608/EJBBE.2023.184969.1061 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sergi, R., Bellucci, D. & Cannillo, V. Materials A Review of Bioactive Glass / (State of the Art, 2020).

  8. El-khooly, M. S., Abdel-Aal, A. A., Mekky, A. E., Al-esnawy, A. A. & Abdraboh, A. S. ‘Tenoxicam-loaded bioglass/polyvinyl alcohol composites for biomedical applications: in-vitro study,’. Mater. Chem. Phys. 336(September 2024), 130526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2025.130526 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Del Tacca, M., Colucci, R., Fornai, M. & Blandizzi, C. Efficacy and tolerability of meloxicam, a COX-2 preferential nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Clin. Drug Investig. 22(12), 799–818. https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200222120-00001 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nilsen, O. G. Clinical pharmacokinetics of tenoxicam. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 26(1), 16–43. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-199426010-00003 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ismail, A. A Review of Phytochemical of Biological Studies of Cycas Species Growing in Middle East. Spectrum Science Journal 2, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21608/sasj.2025.345074.1001 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gül, H. & Avuloğlu Yilmaz, E. Investigation of the genotoxic effects of the analgesic drugs piroxicam and tenoxicam in human lymphocytes. Black Sea J. Eng. Sci. 6(4), 540–549. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1340985 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Khodeer, D.M. Beyond Glycemic Control: Cardiovascular, Renal, and Hepatic Benefits of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists. Spectrum Science Journal 1, 15–26, https://doi.org/10.21608/sasj.2024.396448 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Elkelish, A.; Abu-Elsaoud, A.M.M. Crosstalk Between Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses in Plants: Mechanisms, Outcomes, and Implications for Crop Improvement. Spectrum Science Journal 1, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.21608/sasj.2024.396598 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Patel, J. R., Carlton, R. A., Needham, T. E., Chichester, C. O. & Vogt, F. G. Preparation, structural analysis, and properties of tenoxicam cocrystals. Int. J. Pharm. 436(1–2), 685–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.07.034 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elkelish, A. New Plant Extracts toward Multidrug Resistance: The Convergence of Nanotechnology and Nanoscience. Spectrum Science Journal 1, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21608/sasj.2024.396119 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nazemi, K., Moztarzadeh, F., Jalali, N., Asgari, S. & Mozafari, M. Synthesis and characterization of poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid nanoparticles-loaded chitosan/bioactive glass scaffolds as a localized delivery system in the bone defects. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/898930 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chakraborty, P. K., Adhikari, J. & Saha, P. Variation of the properties of sol-gel synthesized bioactive glass 45S5 in organic and inorganic acid catalysts. Mater. Adv. 2 (1), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ma00628a (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bharatham, B. H., Abu Bakar, M. Z., Perimal, E. K., Yusof, L. M. & Hamid, M. Development and characterization of novel porous 3d alginate-cockle shell powder nanobiocomposite bone scaffold. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/146723 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Perez, C. Antibiotic assay by agar-well diffusion method. Acta Biol. Med. Exp. 15, 113–115 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  21. de O. Nassor, E. C. et al. Influence of the hydrolysis and condensation time on the preparation of hybrid materials. Mater. Res. 14(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392011005000003 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Franco, P. Q., João, C. F. C., Silva, J. C. & Borges, J. P. Electrospun hydroxyapatite fibers from a simple sol-gel system. Mater. Lett. 67 (1), 233–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2011.09.090 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  23. de Ferri, L., Lorenzi, A. & Lottici, P. P. OctTES/TEOS system for hybrid coatings: real-time monitoring of the hydrolysis and condensation by Raman spectroscopy. J. Raman Spectrosc. 47 (6), 699–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.4881 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Arambula-Maldonado, R. & Mequanint, K. Sol-gel derived gelatin-bioactive glass nanocomposite biomaterials incorporating calcium chloride and calcium ethoxide. Polymers https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16060747 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Volkov, D. S., Rogova, O. B. & Proskurnin, M. A. Organic matter and mineral composition of silicate soils: FTIR comparison study by photoacoustic, diffuse reflectance, and attenuated total reflection modalities. Agronomy 11 (9), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091879 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Abdulbaqi, M. R., Ouda, G. I. & Abdulelah, F. M. Solubility enhancement of class II drug tenoxicam utilizing nanocrystallization technique development, and characterization. Int. J. Drug Deliv. Technol. 11(3), 1018–1026. https://doi.org/10.25258/ijddt.11.3.63 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Maggi, L., Friuli, V., Bruni, G., Rinaldi, A. & Bini, M. Hybrid nanocomposites of tenoxicam: layered double hydroxides (LDHs) vs. hydroxyapatite (HAP) inorganic carriers. Molecules https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28104035 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Marikhin, V. A., Gur’eva, S. A., Myasnikova, L. P., Volchek, B. Z. & Medvedeva, D. A. Study of the kinetics of the phase transition of the first order in tetracosane C24H50 by Fourier-transform IR spectroscopy. Phys. Solid State 61(10), 1785–1789. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063783419100251 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Timchenko, E. V., Timchenko, P. E., Zherdeva, L. A., Tregub, N. V. & Shamina, L. A. Raman spectroscopy for the control of soil contamination by copper ions. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/643/1/012032 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Elshafie, H. S., Sadeek, S. A., Camele, I. & Mohamed, A. A. Biological and spectroscopic investigations of new tenoxicam and 1.10-phenthroline metal complexes. Molecules 25(5), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051027 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Caira, M. R., Nassimbeni, L. R. & Timme, M. Zwitterionic nature of tenoxicam: crystal structures and thermal analyses of a polymorph of tenoxicam and a 1:1 tenoxicam:acetonitrile solvate. J. Pharm. Sci. 84(7), 884–888. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600840719 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Barth, A. Infrared spectroscopy of proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 1767(9), 1073–1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2007.06.004 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Osman, S. K. et al. A novel approach for the availability and ocular delivery of tenoxicam potassium: synthesis, characterization, and in vivo application. AAPS PharmSciTech https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-022-02487-3 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kasaai, M. R. A review of several reported procedures to determine the degree of N-acetylation for chitin and chitosan using infrared spectroscopy. Carbohydr. Polym. 71(4), 497–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.07.009 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jebur, Q. M., Hashim, A. & Habeeb, M. A. Fabrication, structural and optical properties for (polyvinyl alcohol-polyethylene oxide-iron oxide) nanocomposites. Egypt. J. Chem. 63(2), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem.2019.10197.1669 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Osman, S. K. et al. A novel approach for the availability and ocular delivery of tenoxicam potassium: synthesis, characterization, and in vivo application. AAPS PharmSciTech https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-022-02487-3 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Etminanrezaeiye, S., Rezazadeh, K., Jalilnejad, E. & Rafiee, R. Preparation and characterization of bio-waste derived chitosan/hydroxyapatite/pectin green biocomposite. Sci. Rep. 15 (1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07588-0 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Liu, D. M., Yang, Q., Troczynski, T. & Tseng, W. J. Structural evolution of sol-gel-derived hydroxyapatite. Biomaterials 23(7), 1679–1687. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00295-2 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Waheed, S., Sultan, M., Jamil, T. & Hussain, T. Comparative analysis of Hydroxyapatite synthesized by sol-gel, ultrasonication and microwave assisted technique. Mater. Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2015.11.073 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Taherian, M., Rojaee, R., Fathi, M. & Tamizifar, M. Effect of different sol-gel synthesis processes on microstructural and morphological characteristics of Hydroxyapatite-bioactive glass composite nanopowders. J. Adv. Ceram. 3(3), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-014-0111-3 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Salahuddin, N., Gaber, M., Elneanaey, S. & Abdelwahab, M. A. Norfloxacin-tenoxicam dual drug delivery system based on poly(lactic acid) microspheres and electrospun fibers: Release and in vivo study. Express Polym. Lett. 16(4), 368–387. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2022.28 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Aljamhan, A. S. et al. Influence of er-cr-ysgg laser and photodynamic therapy on the dentin bond integrity of nano-Hydroxyapatite containing resin dentin adhesive: SEM-EDX, micro-Raman, micro-tensile, and FTIR evaluation. Polymers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13121903 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Amin, A. S. Spectrophotometric determination of piroxicam and tenoxicam in pharmaceutical formulations using alizarin. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 29(4), 729–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(02)00035-3 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Al-Goul, S. T. et al. Synthesis of photoluminescence carbon dots from red beetroot and utilizing its extract as blue-emitted fluorescence probes for spectrofluorimetric determination of tenoxicam in varied pharmaceutical samples. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 445, 115028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2023.115028 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  45. El-khooly, M. S. Drug Delivery of Corticosteroids, P. M. Radenkovic, Ed., Rijeka: IntechOpen, p. Ch. 35. (2022). https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.109085

  46. Abd raboh, A., El-khooly, M. & Hassaan, M. Preparation of bioglass/chitosan composite incorporated with dexamethasone by sol-gel method.. Egypt. J. Biomed. Eng. Biophys. 0(0), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejbbe.2019.14005.1025 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Drago, L., Toscano, M. & Bottagisio, M. Recent evidence on bioactive glass antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity: A mini-review. Materials (2), https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11020326 (2018).

  48. Zhou, P., Garcia, B. L. & Kotsakis, G. A. Comparison of antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of bioactive glass compounds S53P4 and 45S5. BMC Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02617-8 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

Download references