The potential cytotoxic effect of recent universal adhesives with modified monomeric compositions on human gingival epithelial cells

Posted on
the-potential-cytotoxic-effect-of-recent-universal-adhesives-with-modified-monomeric-compositions-on-human-gingival-epithelial-cells
The potential cytotoxic effect of recent universal adhesives with modified monomeric compositions on human gingival epithelial cells

References

  1. Wawrzynkiewicz, A. et al. The cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of three dental universal adhesives-an in vitro study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 3950. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113950 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sofan, E. et al. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: From the IV generation to the universal type. Ann. Stomatol. 8, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  3. El-Maksoud, O. A., Hamama, H. H. H., Wafaie, R. A. & Mahmoud, S. H. Controversies about refrigeration of dental adhesives: A review. BDJ open. 11, 93. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-025-00379-9 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elkaffas, A. A., Hamama, H. H. H. & Mahmoud, S. H. Do universal adhesives promote bonding to dentin? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Restor. Dent. Endod. 43, e29. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e29 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Van Meerbeek, B. et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper. Dent. 28, 215–235 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmed, B., El-Maksoud, O. A., Wafaie, R. A. & Mahmoud, S. H. Effect of short dentin etching and water storage on bonding of resin composite to dentin with universal and two-step self-etch adhesive systems. Sci. Rep. 15, 43817. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-31027-9 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nagarkar, S., Theis-Mahon, N. & Perdigão, J. Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B. Appl. Biomater. 107, 2121–2131. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34305 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Perdigão, J., Sezinando, A. & Monteiro, P. C. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am. J. Dent. 25, 153–158 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ahmed, M. H. et al. Quick bonding using a universal adhesive. Clin. Oral. Investig. 24, 2837–2851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03149-8 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ghajari, M. F., Ghasemi, A., Badiee, M., Abdolazimi, Z. & Baghban, A. A. Microshear bond strength of scotchbond universal adhesive to primary and permanent dentin: A six-month in vitro study. Front. Dent. 16, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v16i3.1588 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elias, S. T. et al. Cytotoxicity of universal, self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems according to the polymerization time. Braz. Dent. J. 26, 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201300294 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Koulaouzidou, E. A., Helvatjoglu-Antoniades, M., Palaghias, G., Karanika-Kouma, A. & Antoniades, D. Cytotoxicity of dental adhesives in vitro. Eur. J. Dent. 3, 3–9 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Putzeys, E. et al. Long-term elution of monomers from resin-based dental composites. Dent. Mater. 35, 477–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.01.005 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van Landuyt, K. L. et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 28, 3757–3785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cadenaro, M. et al. Progress in dental adhesive materials. J. Dent. Res. 102, 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345221145673 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Massaro, H. et al. Solvent and HEMA increase adhesive toxicity and cytokine release from dental pulp cells. Materials (Basel) 12, 2750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172750 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moreira, M. et al. Bisphenol A release from orthodontic adhesives measured in vitro and in vivo with gas chromatography. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop. 151, 477–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.07.019 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roll, E. B., Dahl, J. E., Runningen, G. & Morisbak, E. In vitro cell death induced by irradiation and chemicals relevant for dental applications; dose-response and potentiation effects. Eur. J. Oral. Sci. 112, 273–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00128.x (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spagnuolo, G. et al. NF-kappaB protection against apoptosis induced by HEMA. J. Dent. Res. 83, 837–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408301103 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schwengberg, S. et al. In vitro embryotoxicity assessment with dental restorative materials. J. Dent. 33, 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.08.001 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sürmelioğlu, D., Hepokur, C., Yavuz, S. A. & Aydın, U. Evaluation of the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of different universal adhesive systems. J. Conserv. Dent. 23, 384–389. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_376_20 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wawrzynkiewicz, A. et al. The toxicity of universal dental adhesives: An in vitro study. Polymers (Basel) 13, 2653. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13162653 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Garcia, I. M. et al. Cytotoxicity evaluation, antibacterial effect, and degree of conversion of QAM-containing adhesives. Braz. Oral. Res. 38, e001. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0001 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Huang, F. M. & Chang, Y. C. Cytotoxicity of dentine-bonding agents on human pulp cells in vitro. Int. Endod. J. 35, 905–909. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00589.x (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Huang, F. M., Li, Y. C., Lee, S. S. & Chang, Y. C. Cytotoxicity of dentine bonding agents on human pulp cells is related to intracellular glutathione levels. Int. Endod. J. 43, 1091–1097. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01779.x (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tu, M. G., Liang, W. M., Wu, T. C. & Chen, S. Y. Evaluation of cytotoxicity of resin bonding materials toward human oral epithelial cells using three assay systems. J. Dent. Sci. 4, 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1991-7902(09)60024-6 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ismail, H. S., Ali, A. I. & Garcia-Godoy, F. In vitro biocompatibility testing of different base materials used for elevation of proximal subgingival margins using human gingival epithelial cells. J. Oral. Sci. 64, 118–123. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.21-0393 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pagano, S. et al. Cytotoxicity of universal dental adhesive systems: Assessment in vitro assays on human gingival fibroblasts. Toxicol. In Vitro. 60, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2019.06.009 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cardoso, M. et al. Effects of Adper™ Scotchbond™ 1 XT, Clearfil™ SE Bond 2 and Scotchbond™ universal in odontoblasts. Materials (Basel) 14, 6435. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216435 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Garcia, I. M., Leitune, V. C. B., Visioli, F., Samuel, S. M. W. & Collares, F. M. Influence of zinc oxide quantum dots in the antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity of an experimental adhesive resin. J. Dent. 73, 57–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.003 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sultan, N. A., Hamama, H. H., Grawish, M. E., El-Toukhy, R. I. & Mahmoud, S. H. Impact of different capping materials extracts on proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of cultured human dental pulp stem cells. Sci. Rep. 15, 11140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93759-y (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Porto, I. C. et al. Cytotoxicity of current adhesive systems: in vitro testing on cell cultures of primary murine macrophages. Dent. Mater. 27, 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.006 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vichai, V. & Kirtikara, K. Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay for cytotoxicity screening. Nat. Protoc. 1, 1112–1116. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.179 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Koulaouzidou, E. A., Papazisis, K. T., Yiannaki, E., Palaghias, G. & Helvatjoglu-Antoniades, M. Effects of dentin bonding agents on the cell cycle of fibroblasts. J. Endod. 35, 275–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.11.013 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sha, B., Gao, W., Wang, S., Xu, F. & Lu, T. Cytotoxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles differs in four liver cells from human and rat. Compos. Part B Eng. 42, 2136–2144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.05.009 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Guo, D. et al. Reactive oxygen species-induced cytotoxic effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles in rat retinal ganglion cells. Toxicol. In vitro. 27, 731–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2012.12.001 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Illeperuma, R. P. et al. Immortalized gingival fibroblasts as a cytotoxicity test model for dental materials. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 23, 753–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-011-4473-6 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Caldas, I. P. et al. In vitro cytotoxicity of dental adhesives: A systematic review. Dent. Mater. 35, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.028 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nedel, F. et al. Comparative analysis of two colorimetric assays in dental pulp cell density. Int. Endod. J. 44, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01796.x (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Matés, J. M. & Sánchez-Jiménez, F. M. Role of reactive oxygen species in apoptosis: implications for cancer therapy. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 32, 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1357-2725(99)00088-6 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Keepers, Y. P. et al. Comparison of the sulforhodamine B protein and tetrazolium (MTT) assays for in vitro chemosensitivity testing. Eur. J. Cancer. 27, 897–900 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Coaguila-Llerena, H., da Silva, L. R. & Faria, G. Research methods assessing sodium hypochlorite cytotoxicity: A scoping review. Heliyon. 10, e23060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23060 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. International Organization for Standardization ISO 10993-5 Biological evaluation of medical devices—Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (2009).

  44. Chen, R. S., Liu, C. C., Tseng, W. Y., Jeng, J. H. & Lin, C. P. Cytotoxicity of three dentin bonding agents on human dental pulp cells. J. Dent. 31, 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(02)00088-x (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Volk, J., Ziemann, C., Leyhausen, G. & Geurtsen, W. Non-irradiated campherquinone induces DNA damage in human gingival fibroblasts. Dent. Mater. 25, 1556–1563. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(02)00088-x (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Alam, A. et al. Evaluating the advancements in a recently introduced universal adhesive compared to its predecessor. J. Dent. Sci. 19, 1609–1619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2023.12.004 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Demirel, G., Demirsoy, F. F. K. & Irmak, Ö. Cytotoxicity evaluation of eluates from universal adhesives by real-time cell analysis. Dent. Mater. J. 39, 815–824. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-221 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lima, A. F., Oliveira, A. A. D., Fronza, B. M., Braga, R. R. & Andia, D. C. Toxicity and cytokine release from human dental pulp stem cells after exposure to universal dental adhesives cured by single peak and polywave LEDs. Dent. Mater. 40, 837–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2024.03.004 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Malacarne-Zanon, J. et al. Effects of ethanol addition on the water sorption/solubility and percent conversion of comonomers in model dental adhesives. Dent. Mater. 25, 1275–1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.03.015 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Fujioka-Kobayashi, M. et al. Effect of the degree of conversion of resin-based composites on cytotoxicity, cell attachment, and gene expression. Dent. Mater. 35, 1173–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.05.015 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ahmed, M. H. et al. Acrylamide monomers in universal adhesives. Dent. Mater. 39, 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2023.01.003 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  52. de Accorinte, M. L., Loguercio, A. D., Reis, A., Muench, A. & de Araújo, V. C. Adverse effects of human pulps after direct pulp capping with the different components from a total-etch, three-step adhesive system. Dent. Mater. 21, 599–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.08.008 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Panda, P. et al. Analysis of pulp tissue viability and cytotoxicity of pulp capping agents. J. Clin. Med. 12, 539. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020539 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ferrúa, C. P. et al. Iodonium salt incorporation in dental adhesives and its relation with degree of conversion, ultimate tensile strength, cell viability, and oxidative stress. Clin. Oral. Investig. 23, 1143–1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2527-6 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Devasagayam, T. P. et al. Free radicals and antioxidants in human health: Current status and future prospects. J. Assoc. Phys. India. 52, 794–804 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Valko, M. et al. Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 39, 44–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2006.07.001 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Krifka, S., Spagnuolo, G., Schmalz, G. & Schweikl, H. A review of adaptive mechanisms in cell responses towards oxidative stress caused by dental resin monomers. Biomaterials 34, 4555–4563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.019 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Nocca, G. et al. Identification of glutathione-methacrylates adducts in gingival fibroblasts and erythrocytes by HPLC-MS and capillary electrophoresis. Dent. Mater. 27, e87–e98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.01.002 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Samuelsen, J. T. et al. Role of thiol-complex formation in 2-hydroxyethyl- methacrylate-induced toxicity in vitro. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 96, 395–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32993 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Geurtsen-, W. & Leyhausen, G. Chemical-biological interactions of the resin monomer triethyleneglycol-dimethacrylate (TEGDMA). J. Dent. Res. 80, 2046–2050. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345010800120401 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Spagnuolo, G. et al. Effect of N-acetyl-L-cysteine on ROS production and cell death caused by HEMA in human primary gingival fibroblasts. Biomaterials 27, 1803–1809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.022 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Related Posts