Transcriptional signatures associated with female receptivity and longevity in genetically male-sterile wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

1. Erenstein, O. et al. Springer International Publishing,. in Wheat Improvement: Food Security in a Changing Climate (eds Matthew P. Reynolds & Hans-Joachim Braun) 47–66 (2022).

2. Gerber, J. S. et al. Global spatially explicit yield gap time trends reveal regions at risk of future crop yield stagnation. Nat. Food. 5, 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-023-00913-8 (2024).

   Google Scholar 

3. Byerlee, D. The globalization of hybrid maize, 1921–70. J. Global History. 15, 101–122 (2020).

   Google Scholar 

4. Erenstein, O., Jaleta, M., Sonder, K., Mottaleb, K. & Prasanna, B. M. Global maize production, consumption and trade: Trends and R&D implications. Food Secur. 14, 1295–1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-022-01288-7 (2022).

   Google Scholar 

5. Garst, N. et al. Evaluation of pollination traits important for hybrid wheat development in Great Plains germplasm. Crop Sci. (2023).

6. Easterly, A. C. et al. Evaluation of hybrid wheat yield in Nebraska. Crop Sci. 60, 1210–1222 (2020).

   Google Scholar 

7. Boeven, P. H., Würschum, T., Rudloff, J., Ebmeyer, E. & Longin, C. F. H. Hybrid seed set in wheat is a complex trait but can be improved indirectly by selection for male floral traits. Euphytica 214, 1–13 (2018).

   Google Scholar 

8. Pickett, A. A. Hybrid wheat-results and problems. Fortschr. der Pflanzenzüchtung (Germany). 15, 259 (1993).

   Google Scholar 

9. Schmidt, C., Hinterberger, V., Philipp, N., Reif, J. C. & Schnurbusch, T. Hybrid grain production in wheat benefits from synchronized flowering and high female flower receptivity. J. Exp. Botany, erae430 (2024).

10. Schneider, J., Berkner, M. O., Philipp, N., Schulthess, A. W. & Reif, J. C. Assessing the Suitability of Elite Lines for Hybrid Seed Production and as Testers in Wide Crosses With Wheat Genetic Resources. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 689825. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.689825 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

11. Schneider, J. et al. First insights into the quantitative genetic composition of the female seed yield for an efficient hybrid seed production in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Plant. Breed. 143, 131–141 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

12. El Hanafi, S., Cherkaoui, S., Kehel, Z., Al-Abdallat, A. & Tadesse, W. Genome-Wide Association and Prediction of Male and Female Floral Hybrid Potential Traits in Elite Spring Bread Wheat Genotypes. Plants 10, 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10050895 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

13. El Hanafi, S., Bendaou, N., Kehel, Z., Sanchez-Garcia, M. & Tadesse, W. Phenotypic evaluation of elite spring bread wheat genotypes for hybrid potential traits. Euphytica 216, 1–16 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

14. Okada, T. et al. Unfertilized ovary pushes wheat flower open for cross-pollination. J. Exp. Bot. 69, 399–412 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

15. Murai, K., Takumi, S., Koga, H., Ogihara, Y. & Pistillody homeotic transformation of stamens into pistil-like structures, caused by nuclear–cytoplasm interaction in wheat. Plant J. 29, 169–181 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

16. De Vries, A. P. Flowering biology of wheat, particularly in view of hybrid seed production—a review. Euphytica 20, 152–170 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

17. Imrie, B. Stigma receptivity in cytoplasmic male sterile wheat. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 6, 175–178 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

18. Molnár-Láng, M., Barnabas, B. & Rajki, E. Changes in the shape, volume, weight and tissue structure of the pistil in the flowers of male sterile wheats during flowering. Cereal Res. Commun., 371–379 (1980).

19. Xie, F. & Hardy, B. Accelerating hybrid rice development. (Int. Rice Res. Inst., (2009).

20. Zhou, H. et al. Genome-wide association analyses reveal the genetic basis of stigma exsertion in rice. Mol. Plant. 10, 634–644 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

21. Qiao, B., Huang, L. & Jiang, J. Mapping QTLs for four traits relating to outcrossing in rice (Oryza sativa L). J. Nanjing Agric. Univ. (2007).

22. Kato, H. & Namai, H. Floral characteristcs and environmental factors for increasing natural outcrossing rate for F1 hybrid seed production of rice Oryza sativa L. Jpn. J. Breed. 37, 318–330 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

23. Miyata, M., Yamamoto, T., Komori, T. & Nitta, N. Marker-assisted selection and evaluation of the QTL for stigma exsertion under japonica rice genetic background. Theor. Appl. Genet. 114, 539–548 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

24. Uga, Y. et al. Mapping QTLs influencing rice floral morphology using recombinant inbred lines derived from a cross between Oryza sativa L. and Oryza rufipogon Griff. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107, 218–226 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

25. Virmani, S. & Athwal, D. Genetic Variability in Floral Characteristics Influencing Outcrossing in Oryza sativa L. 1. Crop Sci. 13, 66–67 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

26. Virmani, S. & Athwal, D. Inheritance of floral characteristics influencing outcrossing in rice. Crop Sci. 14, 350–353 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

27. Xin-Qiao, Y. et al. Dissection of additive, epistatic effect and Q× E interaction of quantitative trait loci influencing stigma exsertion under water stress in rice. Acta Genet. Sinica. 33, 542–550 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

28. Yamamoto, T. QTL analysis of stigma exsertion in rice. Rice Genet. Newsl. 20, 33–34 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

29. Yan, W. G. et al. Association mapping of stigma and spikelet characteristics in rice (Oryza sativa L). Mol. Breed.. 24, 277–292 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

30. Dang, X. et al. SYL3-k increases style length and yield of F1 seeds via enhancement of endogenous GA4 content in Oryza sativa L. pistils. Theor. Appl. Genet. 135, 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-021-03968-y (2022).

    Google Scholar 

31. Liu, Q. et al. Fine mapping and candidate gene analysis of qSTL3, a stigma length-conditioning locus in rice (Oryza sativa L). PLoS One. 10, e0127938. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127938 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

32. Xu, S. et al. Identification of a major quantitative trait locus and its candidate underlying genetic variation for rice stigma exsertion rate. Crop J. 7, 350–359 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

33. Guo, N. et al. Fine mapping and target gene identification of qSE4, a QTL for stigma exsertion rate in rice (Oryza sativa L). Front. Plant Sci. 13, 959859 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

34. Huang, J. et al. The genetic editing of GS3 via CRISPR/Cas9 accelerates the breeding of three-line hybrid rice with superior yield and grain quality. Mol. Breed.. 42, 22 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

35. Takano-Kai, N., Doi, K. & Yoshimura, A. GS3 participates in stigma exsertion as well as seed length in rice. Breed. Sci. 61, 244–250 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

36. Tan, Q. et al. Grain shape is a factor affecting the stigma exsertion rate in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1087285 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

37. Yang, L. et al. Genome-wide association analysis and allelic mining of grain shape-related traits in rice. Rice Sci. 26, 384–392 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

38. Zhao, D. S. et al. GS9 acts as a transcriptional activator to regulate rice grain shape and appearance quality. Nat. Commun. 9, 1240 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

39. Zhu, X. et al. Targeted manipulation of grain shape genes effectively improves outcrossing rate and hybrid seed production in rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 21, 381–390 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

40. Heslop-Harrison, Y. & Shivanna, K. The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma. Ann. Botany. 41, 1233–1258 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

41. McInnis, S. M., Costa, L. M., Gutiérrez-Marcos, J. F., Henderson, C. A. & Hiscock, S. J. Isolation and characterization of a polymorphic stigma-specific class III peroxidase gene from Senecio squalidus L.(Asteraceae). Plant Mol. Biol. 57, 659–677 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

42. Serrano, I. & Olmedilla, A. Histochemical location of key enzyme activities involved in receptivity and self-incompatibility in the olive tree (Olea europaea L). Plant Sci. 197, 40–49 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

43. Shivanna, K. & Sastri, D. Stigma-surface esterase activity and stigma receptivity in some taxa characterized by wet stigmas. Ann. Botany. 47, 53–64 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

44. McInnis, S. M. et al. The role of stigma peroxidases in flowering plants: insights from further characterization of a stigma-specific peroxidase (SSP) from Senecio squalidus (Asteraceae). J. Exp. Bot. 57, 1835–1846 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

45. Francoz, E. et al. Roles of cell wall peroxidases in plant development. Phytochemistry 112, 15–21 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

46. Millan-Blanquez, M. et al. A scalable phenotyping approach for female floral organ development and senescence in the absence of pollination in wheat. Development 149, dev200889 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

47. González, M. V., Coque, M. & Herrero, M. Papillar integrity as an indicator of stigmatic receptivity in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa). J. Exp. Bot. 46, 263–269 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

48. Zhang, T. et al. Exo84c interacts with VAP27 to regulate exocytotic compartment degradation and stigma senescence. Nat. Commun. 14, 4888 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

49. Gao, Z. et al. KIRA1 and ORESARA1 terminate flower receptivity by promoting cell death in the stigma of Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants. 4, 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0160-7 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

50. Van Durme, M. et al. Fertility loss in senescing Arabidopsis ovules is controlled by the maternal sporophyte via a NAC transcription factor triad. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 120, e2219868120 (2023).

51. Olvera-Carrillo, Y. et al. A Conserved Core of Programmed Cell Death Indicator Genes Discriminates Developmentally and Environmentally Induced Programmed Cell Death in Plants. Plant Physiol. 169, 2684–2699. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00769 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

52. Šimášková, M. et al. KIL1 terminates fertility in maize by controlling silk senescence. Plant. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koac151 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

53. Goring, D. R. Exocyst, exosomes, and autophagy in the regulation of Brassicaceae pollen-stigma interactions. J. Exp. Bot. 69, 69–78 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

54. Jamshed, M., Sankaranarayanan, S., Abhinandan, K. & Samuel, M. A. Stigma receptivity is controlled by functionally redundant MAPK pathway components in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant. 13, 1582–1593 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

55. Samuel, M. A. et al. Cellular pathways regulating responses to compatible and self-incompatible pollen in Brassica and Arabidopsis stigmas intersect at Exo70A1, a putative component of the exocyst complex. Plant. Cell. 21, 2655–2671 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

56. Rohde, A. et al. New genomic resources to boost research in reproductive biology to enable cost-effective hybrid seed production. Plant. Genome. 18 (e70092). https://doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.70092 (2025).

57. Waddington, S., Cartwright, P. & Wall, P. A quantitative scale of spike initial and pistil development in barley and wheat. Ann. Botany. 51, 119–130 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

58. Wilkinson, L. G., Yang, X., Burton, R. A., Würschum, T. & Tucker, M. R. Natural Variation in Ovule Morphology Is Influenced by Multiple Tissues and Impacts Downstream Grain Development in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L). Front. Plant Sci. 10 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01374 (2019).

59. Yang, X. et al. MADS31 supports female germline development by repressing the post-fertilization program in cereal ovules. bioRxiv, 2022.2012.2005.519106 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.05.519106

60. Yang, X. et al. MADS31 supports female germline development by repressing the post-fertilization programme in cereal ovules. Nat. Plants. 11, 543–560 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

61. Yuo, T. et al. A SHORT INTERNODES (SHI) family transcription factor gene regulates awn elongation and pistil morphology in barley. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 5223–5232 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

62. Safavian, D. et al. RNA silencing of exocyst genes in the stigma impairs the acceptance of compatible pollen in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 169, 2526–2538 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

63. Robinson, R. et al. The triticale mature pollen and stigma proteomes – assembling the proteins for a productive encounter. J. Proteom. 278, 104867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2023.104867 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

64. Kaneko, M. et al. Where do gibberellin biosynthesis and gibberellin signaling occur in rice plants? Plant J. 35, 104–115 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

65. Pharis, R. P. & King, R. W. Gibberellins and reproductive development in seed plants. (1985).

66. Plackett, A. R. G., Thomas, S. G., Wilson, Z. A. & Hedden, P. Gibberellin control of stamen development: a fertile field. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 568–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.06.007 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

67. Weiss, D. et al. Identification of endogenous gibberellins in petunia flowers (induction of anthocyanin biosynthetic gene expression and the antagonistic effect of abscisic acid). Plant Physiol. 107, 695–702 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

68. Tucker, E. J. et al. Molecular identification of the wheat male fertility gene Ms1 and its prospects for hybrid breeding. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00945-2 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

69. Cheng, J., Hill, C. B., Shabala, S., Li, C. & Zhou, M. Manipulating GA-related genes for cereal crop improvement. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 14046 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

70. Sun, T. Gibberellin-GID1-DELLA: a pivotal regulatory module for plant growth and development. Plant Physiol. 154, 567–570 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

71. Daviere, J. M. & Achard, P. A pivotal role of DELLAs in regulating multiple hormone signals. Mol. Plant. 9, 10–20 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

72. He, H. & Yamamuro, C. Interplays between auxin and GA signaling coordinate early fruit development. Hortic. Res. 9 https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhab078 (2022).

73. Gupta, R., Sutradhar, H., Chakrabarty, S., Ansari, M. W. & Singh, Y. Stigmatic receptivity determines the seed set in Indian mustard, rice and wheat crops. Commun. Integr. Biol. 8, e1042630 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

74. ElShamey, E. A. et al. Growth regulators improve outcrossing rate of diverse rice cytoplasmic male sterile lines through affecting floral traits. Plants 11, 1291 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

75. Jagadeeswari, P., Sharma, S. & Dadlani, M. Effect of different chemicals on traits favouring outcrossing and optimization of GA3 for seed production of cytoplasmic male sterile line in hybrid rice. Seed Sci. Technol. 32, 473–483 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

76. Parihar, A. Effect of GA3 and other chemicals for increased seed yield of cms lines in rice. Electron. J. Plant. Breed. 3, 952–955 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

77. Pin, S., Sreewongchai, T. & Onwimol, D. Effects of gibberellic acid applied at different flowering stages on agronomic traits and yields of hybrid rice parental lines. Sci. Technol. Asia, 126–134 (2019).

78. Thu, B. V., Chakrabarty, S., Sharma, S. & Dadlani, M. Studies on environmental conditions and pollination management in hybrid rice seed production. Indian J. Genet. Plant. Breed. 68, 426–434 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

79. Cheng, X. et al. Identification and Analysis of the GASR Gene Family in Common Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Characterization of TaGASR34, a Gene Associated With Seed Dormancy and Germination. Front. Genet. 10–2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00980 (2019).

80. Dong, L. et al. Natural variation of TaGASR7-A1 affects grain length in common wheat under multiple cultivation conditions. Mol. Breed.. 34, 937–947 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

81. Zhang, D. et al. Divergence in homoeolog expression of the grain length-associated gene GASR7 during wheat allohexaploidization. Crop J. 3, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2014.08.005 (2015). https://doi.org/https://doi.

    Google Scholar 

82. Zhang, Y. et al. Efficient and transgene-free genome editing in wheat through transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 DNA or RNA. Nat. Commun. 7, 12617. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12617 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

83. Huttly, A. & Baulcombe, D. A wheat α-Amy2 promoter is regulated by gibberellin in transformed oat aleurone protoplasts. EMBO J. 8, 1907–1913 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

84. Tregear, J. W., Primavesi, L. F. & Huttly, A. K. Functional analysis of linker insertions and point mutations in the α-Amy2/54 GA-regulated promoter. Plant Mol. Biol. 29, 749–758 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

85. Cosgrove, D. J. Loosening of plant cell walls by expansins. Nature 407, 321–326 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

86. Ogawa, M. et al. Gibberellin biosynthesis and response during Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant. Cell. 15, 1591–1604 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

87. Sanzol, J. & Herrero, M. The effective pollination period in fruit trees. Sci. Hort. 90, 1–17. (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(00)00252-1.

    Google Scholar 

88. Williams, R. The effect of summer nitrogen applications on the quality of apple blossom. J. Hortic. Sci. 40, 31–41 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

89. Pallotta, M. et al. Diversity in bread and durum wheat stigma morphology and linkage of increased stigma length to dwarfing gene Rht14. Theor. Appl. Gene. 137, 160 (2024).

90. Duan, S., Cui, C., Chen, L., Yang, Z. & Hu, Y. G. Fine mapping and candidate gene analysis of dwarf gene Rht14 in durum wheat (Triticum durum). Funct. Integr. Genomics, 1–12 (2022).

91. Driscoll, C. Cytogenetic analysis of two chromosomal male-sterility mutants in hexaploid wheat. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 28, 413–416 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

92. Sasakuma, T., Maan, S. & Williams, N. D. EMS-induced male‐sterile mutants in euplasmic and alloplasmic common wheat 1. Crop Sci. 18, 850–853 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

93. Pallotta, M. et al. in Proceedings of the Tenth International Wheat Genetics Symposium. 789–791 (Istituto Sperimentale per la Cerealicoltura Puglia, Italy).

94. Jacyn Baker, C. & Mock, N. M. An improved method for monitoring cell death in cell suspension and leaf disc assays using evans blue. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 39, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037585 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

95. Team, P. (2022).

96. Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. The R package Rsubread is easier, faster, cheaper and better for alignment and quantification of RNA sequencing reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, e47–e47. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz114 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

97. Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47–e47 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

98. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

99. Langfelder, P. & Horvath, S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform. 9, 1–13 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

100. Huynh-Thu, V. A., Irrthum, A., Wehenkel, L. & Geurts, P. Inferring regulatory networks from expression data using tree-based methods. PloS One. 5, e12776 (2010).

     Google Scholar 

101. Jin, J. et al. PlantTFDB 4.0: Toward a central hub for transcription factors and regulatory interactions in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. gkw982 (2016).

102. Tian, F., Yang, D. C., Meng, Y. Q., Jin, J. & Gao, G. PlantRegMap: charting functional regulatory maps in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D1104–D1113 (2020).

     Google Scholar 

103. Borrill, P., Harrington, S. A., Simmonds, J. & Uauy, C. Identification of transcription factors regulating senescence in wheat through gene regulatory network modelling. Plant Physiol. 180, 1740–1755 (2019).

     Google Scholar 

104. Kolde, R. & Kolde, M. R. Package ‘pheatmap’. R package. 1, 790 (2015).

     Google Scholar 

105. Young, M. D., Wakefield, M. J., Smyth, G. K. & Oshlack, A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 11, 1–12 (2010).

     Google Scholar 

106. Kolberg, L. et al. g:Profiler—interoperable web service for functional enrichment analysis and gene identifier mapping (2023 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 51, W207–W212. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad347 (2023).

     Google Scholar 

107. Kanehisa, M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 28, 1947–1951 (2019).

     Google Scholar 

108. Kanehisa, M., Furumichi, M., Sato, Y., Matsuura, Y. & Ishiguro-Watanabe, M. KEGG: biological systems database as a model of the real world. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D672–D677 (2025).

     Google Scholar 

109. Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000).

     Google Scholar 

Download references