Transient cavitation enables ultrafast fouling removal in mesh bioreactors for efficient sludge‒liquid separation during wastewater treatment

1. Shannon, M. A. et al. Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 452, 301–310 (2008.

   Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

2. Mafuta, C. et al. Sanitation and Wastewater Atlas of Africa (Grid-Arendal, 2021).

3. van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. & Brdjanovic, D. Anticipating the next century of wastewater treatment. Science 344, 1452–1453 (2014).

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

4. Progress on the Proportion of Domestic and Industrial Wastewater Flows Safely Treated: Mid-Term Status of SDG Indicator 6.3.1 and Acceleration Needs, with a Special Focus on Climate Change, Wastewater Reuse and Health (WHO, 2024).

5. Preisner, M., Neverova-Dziopak, E. & Kowalewski, Z. An analytical review of different approaches to wastewater discharge standards with particular emphasis on nutrients. Environ. Manage. 66, 694–708 (2020).

   Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

6. Qualls, R. G., Flynn, M. P. & Johnson, J. D. The role of suspended particles in ultraviolet disinfection. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 55, 1280–1285 (1983).

   CAS  Google Scholar 

7. Jenkins, D. Towards a comprehensive model of activated sludge bulking and foaming. Water Sci. Technol. 25, 215–230 (1992).

   Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

8. Xiao, K., Liang, S., Wang, X., Chen, C. & Huang, X. Current state and challenges of full-scale membrane bioreactor applications: a critical review. Bioresour. Technol. 271, 473–481 (2019).

   Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

9. Krzeminski, P., Leverette, L., Malamis, S. & Katsou, E. Membrane bioreactors—a review on recent developments in energy reduction, fouling control, novel configurations, LCA and market prospects. J. Membr. Sci. 527, 207–227 (2017).

   Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

10. Tolkou, A. K. & Zouboulis, A. I. Effect of climate change in WWTPs with a focus on MBR infrastructure. Desalin. Water Treat. 57, 2344–2354 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

11. Wang, Z. et al. Membrane cleaning in membrane bioreactors: a review. J. Membr. Sci. 468, 276–307 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

12. Meng, F. et al. Fouling in membrane bioreactors: an updated review. Water Res. 114, 151–180 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

13. Jenkins, D., Richard, M. G. & Daigger, G. T. Manual on the Causes and Control of Activated Sludge Bulking, Foaming and Other Solids Separation Problems (Crc Press, 2003).

14. Martins, A. M. P., Pagilla, K., Heijnen, J. J. & van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. Filamentous bulking sludge—a critical review. Water Res. 38, 793–817 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

15. Purba, L. D. A. et al. Various applications of aerobic granular sludge: a review. Environ. Technol. Innovation 20, 101045 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

16. Singh, M. & Srivastava, R. K. Sequencing batch reactor technology for biological wastewater treatment: a review. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 6, 3–13 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

17. Verawaty, M., Pijuan, M., Yuan, Z. & Bond, P. L. Determining the mechanisms for aerobic granulation from mixed seed of floccular and crushed granules in activated sludge wastewater treatment. Water Res. 46, 761–771 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

18. Fan, B. & Huang, X. Characteristics of a self-forming dynamic membrane coupled with a bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 5245–5251 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

19. Ersahin, M. E. et al. A review on dynamic membrane filtration: materials, applications and future perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 122, 196–206 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

20. Mohan, S. M. & Nagalakshmi, S. A review on aerobic self-forming dynamic membrane bioreactor: formation, performance, fouling and cleaning. J. Water Process Eng. 37, 101541 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Hu, Y., Wang, X. C., Ngo, H. H., Sun, Q. & Yang, Y. Anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor (AnDMBR) for wastewater treatment: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 247, 1107–1118 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

22. Rezvani, F., Mehrnia, M. R. & Poostchi, A. A. Optimal operating strategies of SFDM formation for MBR application. Sep. Purif. Technol. 124, 124–133 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

23. Zhao, Y., Yang, F., Jiang, H. & Gao, G. Piezoceramic membrane with built-in ultrasound for reactive oxygen species generation and synergistic vibration anti-fouling. Nat. Commun. 15, 4845 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

24. Mao, H. et al. Self-cleaning piezoelectric membrane for oil-in-water separation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 18093–18103 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

25. Zou, D. & Lee, Y. M. Design strategy of poly(vinylidene fluoride) membranes for water treatment. Prog. Polym. Sci. 128, 101535 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

26. Chen, D., Sharma, S. K. & Mudhoo, A. Handbook on Applications of Ultrasound: Sonochemistry for Sustainability (CRC press, 2011).

27. Aghapour Aktij, S., Taghipour, A., Rahimpour, A., Mollahosseini, A. & Tiraferri, A. A critical review on ultrasonic-assisted fouling control and cleaning of fouled membranes. Ultrasonics 108, 106228 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

28. Lamminen, M. O., Walker, H. W. & Weavers, L. K. Mechanisms and factors influencing the ultrasonic cleaning of particle-fouled ceramic membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 237, 213–223 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

29. Riesz, P., Berdahl, D. & Christman, C. L. Free radical generation by ultrasound in aqueous and nonaqueous solutions. Environ. Health Perspect. 64, 233–252 (1985).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

30. Chu, H. Q. et al. Dynamic membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment: operation, critical flux, and dynamic membrane structure. J. Membr. Sci. 450, 265–271 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

31. Gonzalez, A., van Lier, J. B. & de Kreuk, M. K. The role of growth media on composition, bioconversion and susceptibility for mild thermal pre-treatment of waste activated sludge. J. Environ. Manage. 298, 113491 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

32. Xiao, T. et al. Membrane fouling and cleaning strategies in microfiltration/ultrafiltration and dynamic membrane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 318, 123977 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

33. Loderer, C., Wörle, A. & Fuchs, W. Influence of different mesh filter module configurations on effluent quality and long-term filtration performance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 3844–3850 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

34. Guan, D., Dai, J., Watanabe, Y. & Chen, G. Changes in the physical properties of the dynamic layer and its correlation with permeate quality in a self-forming dynamic membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 140, 67–76 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

35. Boo, C., Hong, S. & Elimelech, M. Relating organic fouling in membrane distillation to intermolecular adhesion forces and interfacial surface energies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 14198–14207 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

36. Nagaoka, H., Ueda, S. & Miya, A. Influence of bacterial extracellular polymers on the membrane separation activated sludge process. Water Sci. Technol. 34, 165–172 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

37. Kim, M. & Nakhla, G. Comparative studies on membrane fouling between two membrane-based biological nutrient removal systems. J. Membr. Sci. 331, 91–99 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

38. Ji, L. & Zhou, J. Influence of aeration on microbial polymers and membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors. J. Membr. Sci. 276, 168–177 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

39. Meng, F., Yang, F., Xiao, J., Zhang, H. & Gong, Z. A new insight into membrane fouling mechanism during membrane filtration of bulking and normal sludge suspension. J. Membr. Sci. 285, 159–165 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

40. Wu, M. et al. High propensity of membrane fouling and the underlying mechanisms in a membrane bioreactor during occurrence of sludge bulking. Water Res. 229, 119456 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

41. Mei, R., Nobu, M. K., Narihiro, T. & Liu, W.-T. Metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses revealed uncultured bacteroidales populations as the dominant proteolytic amino acid degraders in anaerobic digesters. Front. Microbiol. 11, 593006 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

42. Ontiveros-Valencia, A. et al. Pyrosequencing analysis yields comprehensive assessment of microbial communities in pilot-scale two-stage membrane biofilm reactors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 7511–7518 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

43. Alhajeri, N. S., Tawfik, A., Elsamadony, M., Al-Fadhli, F. M. & Meng, F. Synergistic algal/bacterial interaction in membrane bioreactor for detoxification of 1,2-dichloroethane-rich petroleum wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 470, 134125 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

44. Shaw, T., Winston, M., Rupp, C. J., Klapper, I. & Stoodley, P. Commonality of elastic relaxation times in biofilms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 098102 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

45. Rabaey, K., Vandekerckhove, T., Van de Walle, A. & Sedlak, D. L. The third route: using extreme decentralization to create resilient urban water systems. Water Res. 185, 116276 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

46. The quest to address the global sanitation crisis. Nat. Water 1, 899 (2023).

47. Kim, K. Y., Byun, K.-T. & Kwak, H.-Y. Temperature and pressure fields due to collapsing bubble under ultrasound. Chem. Eng. J. 132, 125–135 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references