Whole-cell modeling predicts alternative proteome allocation strategies in the archaeon Methanococcus maripaludis

1. Fang, X., Lloyd, C. J. & Palsson, B. O. Reconstructing organisms in silico: genome-scale models and their emerging applications. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 731–743 (2020).

   Google Scholar 

2. Mardinoglu, A. & Palsson, B. Ø. Genome-scale models in human metabologenomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 26, 123–140 (2025).

   Google Scholar 

3. Gu, C., Kim, G. B., Kim, W. J., Kim, H. U. & Lee, S. Y. Current status and applications of genome-scale metabolic models. Genome Biol. 20, 121 (2019).

   Google Scholar 

4. Dukovski, I. et al. A metabolic modeling platform for the computation of microbial ecosystems in time and space (COMETS). Nat. Protoc. 16, 5030–5082 (2021).

   Google Scholar 

5. O’Brien, E. J., Lerman, J. A., Chang, R. L., Hyduke, D. R. & Palsson, B. Ø. Genome-scale models of metabolism and gene expression extend and refine growth phenotype prediction. Mol. Syst. Biol. 9, 693 (2013).

6. O’Brien, E. J., Monk, J. M. & Palsson, B. O. Using Genome-scale models to predict biological capabilities. Cell 161, 971–987 (2015).

   Google Scholar 

7. Kerkhoven, E. J. Advances in constraint-based models: methods for improved predictive power based on resource allocation constraints. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 68, 102168 (2022).

   Google Scholar 

8. Elsemman, I. E. et al. Whole-cell modeling in yeast predicts compartment-specific proteome constraints that drive metabolic strategies. Nat. Commun. 13, 801 (2022).

   Google Scholar 

9. Chen, Y. et al. Proteome constraints reveal targets for improving microbial fitness in nutrient-rich environments. Mol. Syst. Biol. 17, e10093 (2021).

   Google Scholar 

10. Hendrickson, E. L. et al. Complete genome sequence of the genetically tractable hydrogenotrophic methanogen Methanococcus Maripaludis. J. Bacteriol. 186, 6956–6969 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

11. Escalante-Semerena, J. C., Rinehart, K. L. Jr. & Wolfe, R. S. Tetrahydromethanopterin, a carbon carrier in methanogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 259, 9447–9455 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

12. Müller, A. L. et al. An alternative resource allocation strategy in the chemolithoautotrophic archaeon Methanococcus maripaludis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118, e2025854118 (2021).

13. Costa, K. C. et al. H2-Independent growth of the hydrogenotrophic methanogen Methanococcus Maripaludis. mBio 4, e00062–e00013 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

14. Lie, T. J. et al. Essential anaplerotic role for the energy-converting hydrogenase Eha in hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 15473–15478 (2012).

15. Hoehler, T. M. & Jørgensen, B. B. Microbial life under extreme energy limitation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11, 83–94 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

16. Roller, B. R. K. & Schmidt, T. M. The physiology and ecological implications of efficient growth. ISME J. 9, 1481–1487 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

17. Leigh, J. A., Albers, S. V., Atomi, H. & Allers, T. Model organisms for genetics in the domain archaea: methanogens, halophiles, thermococcales and sulfolobales. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 35, 577–608 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

18. Abdul Halim, M. F., Hanson, E. H. & Costa, K. C. Methanococcus Maripaludis. Trends Microbiol. 32, 823–824 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

19. Thevasundaram, K., Gallagher, J. J., Cherng, F. & Chang, M. C. Y. Engineering nonphotosynthetic carbon fixation for production of bioplastics by methanogenic archaea. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A 119, e2118638119 (2022).

20. Lyu, Z. & Whitman, W. B. Transplanting the pathway engineering toolbox to methanogens. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 59, 46–54 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

21. Lyu, Z. et al. Engineering the autotroph Methanococcus Maripaludis for geraniol production. ACS Synth. Biol. 5, 577–581 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

22. Stolyar, S. et al. Metabolic modeling of a mutualistic microbial community. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 92 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

23. Goyal, N., Widiastuti, H., Karimi, I. A. & Zhou, Z. A genome-scale metabolic model of Methanococcus Maripaludis S2 for CO2 capture and conversion to methane. Mol. Biosyst. 10, 1043–1054 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

24. Richards, M. A. et al. Exploring hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis: a genome scale metabolic reconstruction of Methanococcus Maripaludis. J. Bacteriol. 198, 3379–3390 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

25. Vo, C. H., Goyal, N., Kraft, M. & Karimi, I. A. Carbon conversion by Methanococcus Maripaludis S2 under diazotrophy and a revised genome-scale metabolic model. Chem. Eng. Sci. 278, 118910 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

26. Gu, W., Müller, A. L., Deutzmann, J. S., Williamson, J. R. & Spormann, A. M. Growth rate-dependent coordination of catabolism and anabolism in the archaeon Methanococcus Maripaludis under phosphate limitation. ISME J. 16, 2313–2319 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

27. Scott, M., Gunderson, C. W., Mateescu, E. M., Zhang, Z. & Hwa, T. Interdependence of cell growth and gene expression: origins and consequences. Science 330, 1099–1102 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

28. Sayers, E. W. et al. Database resources of the National center for biotechnology information in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D20–D29 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

29. Chan, P. P., Lin, B. Y., Mak, A. J. & Lowe, T. M. tRNAscan-SE 2.0: improved detection and functional classification of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 9077–9096 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

30. Chan, P. P. & Lowe, T. M. GtRNAdb 2.0: an expanded database of transfer RNA genes identified in complete and draft genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D184–D189 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

31. Kanehisa, M., Furumichi, M., Sato, Y., Kawashima, M. & Ishiguro-Watanabe M. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D587–D592 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

32. Kanehisa, M., Furumichi, M., Sato, Y., Matsuura, Y. & Ishiguro-Watanabe, M. KEGG: biological systems database as a model of the real world. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D672–D677 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

33. Chang, A. et al. BRENDA, the ELIXIR core data resource in 2021: new developments and updates. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D498–D508 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

34. Li, F., Chen, Y., Anton, M. & Nielsen, J. GotEnzymes: an extensive database of enzyme parameter predictions. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D583–D586 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

35. Burley, S. K. et al. Updated resources for exploring experimentally-determined PDB structures and computed structure models at the RCSB protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D564–D574 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

36. Röst, H. L., Schmitt, U., Aebersold, R. & Malmström, L. PyOpenMS: a Python-based interface to the openms mass-spectrometry algorithm library. Proteomics 14, 74–77 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

37. Ebrahim, A., Lerman, J. A., Palsson, B. O. & Hyduke, D. R. COBRApy: COnstraints-Based reconstruction and analysis for python. BMC Syst. Biol. 7, 74 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

38. Chan, S. H. J., Cai, J., Wang, L., Simons-Senftle, M. N. & Maranas, C. D. Standardizing biomass reactions and ensuring complete mass balance in genome-scale metabolic models. Bioinformatics 33, 3603–3609 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

39. Gleixner, A. M., Steffy, D. E. & Wolter, K. Iterative refinement for linear programming. INFORMS J. Comput. 28, 449–464 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

40. Mueller, F. M. et al. Non-canonical resource allocation in heterotrophically growing thermoanaerobacter Kivui. Nat. Commun. 16, 8489 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

41. Sánchez, B. J. et al. Improving the phenotype predictions of a yeast genome-scale metabolic model by incorporating enzymatic constraints. Mol. Syst. Biol. 13, 935 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

42. Sher, D., Segrè, D. & Follows, M. J. Quantitative principles of microbial metabolism shared across scales. Nat. Microbiol. 9, 1940–1953 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

43. Metzl-Raz, E. et al. Principles of cellular resource allocation revealed by condition-dependent proteome profiling. Elife 6, e28034 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

44. Björkeroth, J. et al. Proteome reallocation from amino acid biosynthesis to ribosomes enables yeast to grow faster in rich media. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 117, 21804–21812 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

45. König, H., Nusser, E. & Stetter, K. O. Glycogen in methanolobus and Methanococcus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 28, 265–269 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

46. Goyal, N., Zhou, Z. & Karimi, I. A. Metabolic processes of Methanococcus Maripaludis and potential applications. Microb. Cell. Fact. 15, 107 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

47. Goyal, N., Padhiary, M., Karimi, I. A. & Zhou, Z. Flux measurements and maintenance energy for carbon dioxide utilization by Methanococcus Maripaludis. Microb. Cell. Fact. 14, 146 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

48. Lupa, B., Hendrickson, E. L., Leigh, J. A. & Whitman, W. B. Formate-Dependent H2 production by the mesophilic methanogen Methanococcus Maripaludis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 6584–6590 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

49. Gencic, S., Duin, E. C. & Grahame, D. A. Tight coupling of partial reactions in the Acetyl-CoA Decarbonylase/Synthase (ACDS) multienzyme complex from methanosarcina thermophila: Acetyl C–C bond fragmentation at the a cluster promoted by protein conformational changes. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 15450–15463 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

50. LaCroix, R. A., Palsson, B. O. & Feist, A. M. A model for designing adaptive laboratory evolution experiments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83, e03115–e03116 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

51. Strucko, T. et al. Laboratory evolution reveals regulatory and metabolic trade-offs of glycerol utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 47, 73–82 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

52. Hong, K. K., Vongsangnak, W., Vemuri, G. N. & Nielsen, J. Unravelling evolutionary strategies of yeast for improving galactose utilization through integrated systems level analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108, 12179–12184 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

Download references